Endoscopic Versus Percutaneous Biliary Drainage for Resectable Pancreatic Head Cancer
NCT ID: NCT04823832
Last Updated: 2021-04-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
80 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-01-01
2020-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Biliary Cannulation During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: Precut Versus Conventional Cannulation
NCT02477228
Preoperative Biliary Drainage in Patients With Operable Malignant Periampulary Tumors
NCT04289831
EUS-Guided Choledochoduodenostomy Versus ERCP for Primary Biliary Decompression in Distal Malignant Biliary Obstruction
NCT04898777
Preoperative Biliary Drainage in Malignant Biliary Obstruction
NCT04847297
Comparison Between Internal and External Preoperative Biliary Drainage in Periampullary Cancers
NCT01134276
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Patients were randomly divided by closed envelope method into two groups; patients were allocated to the first group (ERCP) who underwent Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangio-Pancreatography coupled with placement of a 10-French plastic stent; and to the second group (PTD) who underwent Fluoroscopy-guided Percutaneous Transhepatic Drainage.
Preoperative biliary drainage Parenteral broad spectrum antibiotics were administered prior and after each intervention. ERCP was performed under general anesthesia in the operation room and a 10-french (3.2 mm) covered polyethylene stent with side flaps to prevent migration was placed below the level of biliary bifurcation. Stents were inserted over a guidewire via an Olympus 4.2 mm channel endoscope, by standard techniques.
PTD was placed in the interventional radiology department under local anesthesia via the left duct sub-xiphoid approach, only via the external approach. A 6 french gauge catheter was positioned with its tip above the biliary obstruction. After PTD, patients were instructed to drink a lot of fluids to replace fluid loss or they were given temporary intravenous fluid supplementation.
After either procedure, patients were either discharged home or kept in hospital. Those who were discharged were readmitted for preoperative preparation. Patients were followed up clinically as well as by laboratory results. The total and direct bilirubin level and other liver function tests were repeated after ten days from the procedure to estimate the decline in their levels. Post-intervention complications either PTD-related such as bleeding, cholangitis, bile leak and catheter occlusion/displacement; or ERCP-related such as pancreatitis, cholangitis, bleeding and stent displacement; were recorded.
Surgery After improvement of liver functions, patients were scheduled for PD. All operations were performed through a hockey-stick incision by consultant surgeons experienced in pancreatic surgery. The standard surgical procedure was pancreaticoduodenectomy with pylorus preservation. The effects of pre-operative drainage were evaluated during the operation in terms of operative resection time, blood loss, difficulties of dissection and intra-operative bleeding. While the endoscopic stent is removed intra-operatively after transection of the common hepatic duct, the catheter of PTD is left and inserted in the hepaticojejunostomy (stented anastomosis) to be removed two weeks later. Perioperative complications (\< 30 days) were stratified for each group according to Clavien-Dindo classification.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
ERCP group
endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography with plastic stent insertion
pancreaticoduodenectomy
resection of the head of pancreas and the duodenum followed by triple anastomosis
PTD group
ultrasound guided percutaneous transhepatic catheter insertion
pancreaticoduodenectomy
resection of the head of pancreas and the duodenum followed by triple anastomosis
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
pancreaticoduodenectomy
resection of the head of pancreas and the duodenum followed by triple anastomosis
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Hyperbilirubinemia, total bilirubin level more than 10 mg/dL
* Cholangitis, pruritis, coagulopathy, nausea and anorexia
Exclusion Criteria
* metastatic disease
* Patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hani Alhadad
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Hani Alhadad
assistant professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Wael N Abdelsalam, doctor
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
dean of faculty
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Faculty of Medicine
Alexandria, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
30/11
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.