Endoscopic Versus Percutaneous Biliary Drainage for Resectable Pancreatic Head Cancer

NCT ID: NCT04823832

Last Updated: 2021-04-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

80 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-01-01

Study Completion Date

2020-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Patients with potentially resectable pancreatic head cancer and high bilirubin level, were stratified into two equal groups according to the method of biliary drainage: endoscopic stenting or percutaneous drainage.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Along with history taking and complete clinical examination, the results of complete blood count, international normalized ratio , renal and liver function tests were obtained. Patients with coagulopathy were corrected by fresh frozen plasma and repeated vitamin K injections to reach an INR of at least 1.4 before the intervention, otherwise, they were excluded. Besides, ultrasound and computed tomography of the abdomen/pelvis (pancreatic protocol) were routinely undertaken. Tumors were staged for resectability according to TNM staging system.

Patients were randomly divided by closed envelope method into two groups; patients were allocated to the first group (ERCP) who underwent Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangio-Pancreatography coupled with placement of a 10-French plastic stent; and to the second group (PTD) who underwent Fluoroscopy-guided Percutaneous Transhepatic Drainage.

Preoperative biliary drainage Parenteral broad spectrum antibiotics were administered prior and after each intervention. ERCP was performed under general anesthesia in the operation room and a 10-french (3.2 mm) covered polyethylene stent with side flaps to prevent migration was placed below the level of biliary bifurcation. Stents were inserted over a guidewire via an Olympus 4.2 mm channel endoscope, by standard techniques.

PTD was placed in the interventional radiology department under local anesthesia via the left duct sub-xiphoid approach, only via the external approach. A 6 french gauge catheter was positioned with its tip above the biliary obstruction. After PTD, patients were instructed to drink a lot of fluids to replace fluid loss or they were given temporary intravenous fluid supplementation.

After either procedure, patients were either discharged home or kept in hospital. Those who were discharged were readmitted for preoperative preparation. Patients were followed up clinically as well as by laboratory results. The total and direct bilirubin level and other liver function tests were repeated after ten days from the procedure to estimate the decline in their levels. Post-intervention complications either PTD-related such as bleeding, cholangitis, bile leak and catheter occlusion/displacement; or ERCP-related such as pancreatitis, cholangitis, bleeding and stent displacement; were recorded.

Surgery After improvement of liver functions, patients were scheduled for PD. All operations were performed through a hockey-stick incision by consultant surgeons experienced in pancreatic surgery. The standard surgical procedure was pancreaticoduodenectomy with pylorus preservation. The effects of pre-operative drainage were evaluated during the operation in terms of operative resection time, blood loss, difficulties of dissection and intra-operative bleeding. While the endoscopic stent is removed intra-operatively after transection of the common hepatic duct, the catheter of PTD is left and inserted in the hepaticojejunostomy (stented anastomosis) to be removed two weeks later. Perioperative complications (\< 30 days) were stratified for each group according to Clavien-Dindo classification.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pancreatic Head Cancer Obstructive Jaundice

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ERCP group

endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography with plastic stent insertion

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

pancreaticoduodenectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

resection of the head of pancreas and the duodenum followed by triple anastomosis

PTD group

ultrasound guided percutaneous transhepatic catheter insertion

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

pancreaticoduodenectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

resection of the head of pancreas and the duodenum followed by triple anastomosis

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

pancreaticoduodenectomy

resection of the head of pancreas and the duodenum followed by triple anastomosis

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

whipple operation

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with malignant obstruction of the distal common bile duct e.g. adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head or periampullary tumor
* Hyperbilirubinemia, total bilirubin level more than 10 mg/dL
* Cholangitis, pruritis, coagulopathy, nausea and anorexia

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with advanced disease
* metastatic disease
* Patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hani Alhadad

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Hani Alhadad

assistant professor

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Wael N Abdelsalam, doctor

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

dean of faculty

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Faculty of Medicine

Alexandria, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

30/11

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.