Quality of Life After Biliodigestive Anastomosis (BDA) or Stents to Treat Biliary Obstruction in Pancreas Cancer

NCT ID: NCT01887041

Last Updated: 2022-07-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

24 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-01-31

Study Completion Date

2015-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To compare the quality of life (QoL) in patients receiving a bilioenteric anastomosis vs. endoscopical stenting for palliation of biliary obstruction due to locally unresectable or metastatic pancreatic cancer. In the past, endoscopy seems to have been favoured based on older studies, but with new chemotherapeutic regimens available, the likelihood to experience stent complications has increased. Therefore, the issue as to which palliation should be favoured has to be reconsidered.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The aim of this multi-centre, prospective-randomised study was to compare the effectiveness of palliative applications on patients suffering from a local, advanced and/or hepatic, metastasising, non-resectable pancreas head carcinoma and jaundice.

Before randomisation, all patients are fitted with an endoscopically inserted biliary tract drainage endoscopically inserted. When postoperatively ascertained that the pancreas head carcinoma is non-resectable, the patient shall be electronically registered and randomly assigned to one of the palliative strategies. Group 1 will be fitted with a biliodigestive anastomosis. Group 2 will continue with the endoscopically inserted drainage. Regardless of which group they belong to, all patients will receive a palliative chemotherapy.

The primary parameter is the average quality of life over a period of 6 months post-operatively, to be analysed monthly using identical questionnaires. The comparison of the randomisation groups will be carried out using a co-variance analysis (ANCOVA) with the initial value, taken directly before the operation, to be used as co-variant.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Local Tumor Spread Advanced Cancer Metastasized Pancreatic Cancer Non-resectable Jaundice

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Biliodigestive anastomosis

Study arm A will, after randomisation, have a biliodigestive anastomosis inserted. After the healing of the wound (al least 14 days postoperative) the treatment using gemcitabine, according to the plan mentioned below.

Gemcitabine shall be administered on days 1, 8 and 15 of each 4 week cycle. The cycle is defined as a weekly, over a period of 3 consecutive weeks, applied infusions, followed by 1 week pause. On the day of therapy a dosage of 1000 mg/ml body surface shall be administered, intravenous, over a period of 30 minutes.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Biliodigestive anastomosis

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Biliodigestive anastomosis

Stent

Arm B, after randomisation the biliary tract stents shall remain. The patients in study arm B will also receive chemotherapy and gemcitabine, according to the recommended palliative therapy for a pancreas carcinoma.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Stent

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Endoscopically inserted biliary tract drainage

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Stent

Endoscopically inserted biliary tract drainage

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Biliodigestive anastomosis

Biliodigestive anastomosis

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Adult patient with local, advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas head and jaundice.
2. Performance-status of 50 or above on the Karnofsky-scale (see attachment).
3. Adequate bone marrow reserves: leukocyte level \> 3.5 x 10´/l, thrombocyte level level \> 100 x 10/l; Haemoglobin\> 80g/l.
4. Male or female patients, at least 18 years old.
5. Women of child bearing age must be sufficient protected against pregnancy (contraception) during and for 3 months after the end of the study.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Adult patients with focal, advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas head and no jaundice; also no jaundice in their anamnesis and with no endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreaticography (ERCP)-induced intervention.
2. Pregnancy
3. Breast feeding
4. Contra-indication for gemcitabine
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jacob R Izbicki, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Universitätsklinik Hamburg

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Universtätsklinik Hamburg-Eppendorf

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1 - mtachezy

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

A RCT of Low MBO Drainage Strategies
NCT06196164 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Preoperative Stent Study
NCT00501176 COMPLETED NA