Comparing Endoscopic Based Stent Strategy Versus Bypass Surgery in Non-resectable Periampullary Cancer

NCT ID: NCT00487851

Last Updated: 2013-04-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-03-31

Study Completion Date

2012-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Randomized study comparing endoscopic stent insertion strategy versus double-bypass surgery in non-resectable periampullary cancer

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Experience shows that patients with advanced periampullary cancer suffer not only from jaundice but in 25 -30% of cases also duodenal stricture with nausea, vomiting and nutritional difficulties. Ten years ago, the only palliative treatment for these patients was a bypass operation for bile flow and intestinal passage. This operation was often associated with a high morbidity. Developments in endoscopic treatments allow palliation with lower morbidity. However, stent treatment is not free of problems like stent dysfunction. During the last ten years, anesthesia and surgical techniques have developed which allow lower postoperative morbidity compared to earlier treatments. A total of 70 patients were randomized to surgery with hepaticojejunostomy on Roux loop and gastrojejunostomy or endoscopic treatment with self-expanding metallic stent in the bile duct and so-called duodenal stent. Based on the inclusion of 70 patients, we expected a 20% difference in some of the primary variables with a power of 80%.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pancreatic Neoplasms Biliary Tract Neoplasms Duodenal Neoplasms

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

Endoscopic treatment strategy

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

endoscopic strategy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Stent insertion

2

Surgical treatment strategy

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

hepaticojejunostomy and gastroenterostomy

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

surgery

hepaticojejunostomy and gastroenterostomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

endoscopic strategy

Stent insertion

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with a locally advanced periampullary neoplastic process with extrahepatic bile duct obstruction.
* The patient tumor burden and general condition should be such that treatment related morbidity and mortality is calculated as "reasonable" and both treatment strategies are considered "applicable".

Exclusion Criteria

* Non consent.
* The patients' general condition will not tolerate either treatment (strategy).
* Previous laparotomy or laparoscopy.
* Life expectancy \< 3 months.
* Inability to participate (language, social, etc.)
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Karolinska Institutet

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Farshad Frozanpor

MD, PhD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Farshad Frozanpor

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Karolinska institut Huddinge

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Karolinksa university hospital

Huddinge, , Sweden

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Sweden

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2006/2:3

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Preoperative Stent Study
NCT00501176 COMPLETED NA
Registry for Advanced Endoscopy
NCT05187312 RECRUITING