Role of Endoscopic RFA in Prolonging the Patency of Metal Stents in Patients With Malignant Obstructive Jaundice

NCT ID: NCT01275768

Last Updated: 2011-01-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE1/PHASE2

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-01-31

Study Completion Date

2011-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Patients with malignant obstructive jaundice (cancer of head of pancreas and cholangiocarcinoma) generally have a very poor prognosis with less than 20% patients having resectable disease at presentation. These patients also have a very poor quality of life with a life expectancy of 6-8 months. Jaundice associated with pruritus, poor appetite, malabsorption and loss of weight and cholangitis is the most common and troublesome problem. Placement of metallic stents has been the standard of care for patients with unresectable disease. However, about 50% of these stents get blocked in 6-8 months. Use of endoscopic Radio-frequency Ablation (RFA) prior to placement of metal stents may increase the patency of these stents

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

We assume that application of endobiliary RFA to the malignant stricture which results in considerable charring of the tumor would result in prolongation of Self-expandable metal Stent (SEMS) patency by decreasing tumor in-growth and overgrowth. It is further speculated that prolonged stent patency will improve the quality of life of these patients, prevent cholangitis and optimize chemotherapy. A further outcome may be an improvement in the survival.

The research questions which we intend to answer through this trial would be:

1. Does application of prior endo-biliary radiofrequency affect patency of SEMS?
2. What are the complications associated with the use of endo-biliary RFA?
3. Does endo-biliary RFA with immediate placement of SEMS improve patient survival?
4. Is there any improvement in the quality of life of the patient with the combined use of endo-biliary RFA and SEMS?

Study protocol:

The study design is a double blind, sham operated, randomized controlled trial.

Inclusion criteria:

1. Patients: Clinical data and investigations suggestive of unresectable malignant bile duct obstruction. All patients will be discussed at the hepato-biliary multidisciplinary meeting which should come to a unanimous decision on tumor unresectability.
2. Age more than 18 years
3. Histologically/ Cytologically confirmed malignancy
4. Informed consent: The patient should voluntarily agree to participation and randomization. Oral and written information about the nature of the trial will be given to all patients considered for inclusion.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Informed consent not obtained or withdrawn
2. Extremely poor general condition not amenable for conscious sedation used for Endoscopic retrograde Cholangiography (ERC)
3. Candidate suitable for surgical resection
4. Klatskin type 4 tumor
5. Previous biliary intervention such as plastic stent insertion for more than 1 month
6. Any other contra-indication to ERC

Randomization:

After obtaining an informed consent and satisfying the inclusion criteria, the patients will be randomized to one of the following two arms using computer generated randomization blocks. The operator and the patient will be blinded to use of RFA

1. Experimental arm: Insertion and activation of the endo-biliary RF catheter at the site of the stricture before insertion of a SEMS
2. Control arm: Insertion and sham activation of the endo-biliary RF catheter at the site of the stricture before insertion of a SEMS.

All patients will get the same SEMS with variable lengths (depending on the stricture size) to maintain uniformity. Endoscopic sphincterotomy will be performed in all patients prior to endo-biliary RF application and SEMS insertion. Opacification of the cystic duct and whether the endo-biliary RFA catheter was placed at the cystic duct opening will be recorded.

Data Collection:

Baseline data will be collected by an advanced endoscopy fellow and will include age, gender, WHO performance score, presence of gall bladder or gall stones, primary tumor type and stage, baseline liver function test, adjuvant chemo/radiotherapy

After discharge from the hospital, the patients will be followed up in the clinic at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months. At each visit, a detailed clinical history, examination, adverse events, adjuvant therapy and liver function tests will be carried out. Patients will be assessed according to the World Health Organization performance classification.

WHO score

* 0 - Asymptomatic (Fully active, able to carry on all predisease activities without restriction)
* 1 - Symptomatic but completely ambulatory (Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature. For example, light housework, office work)
* 2 - Symptomatic, \<50% in bed during the day (Ambulatory and capable of all self care but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours)
* 3 - Symptomatic, \>50% in bed, but not bedbound (Capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed or chair 50% or more of waking hours)
* 4 - Bedbound (Completely disabled. Cannot carry on any self-care. Totally confined to bed or chair)
* 5 - Death All patients will be referred for an oncological opinion for palliative chemotherapy. The patients and their care-givers will be told about symptoms of cholangitis and stent obstruction and will be asked to contact the hospital immediately in such cases. In the event of a confirmed SEMS occlusion, either a new SEMS or a plastic stent will be placed depending on the patient's prognosis.

End points:

1. Stent occlusion:

1. Cholangitis
2. or serum bilirubin \> 3mg/dL with a previously normal bilirubin or above the baseline.
3. Any clinical jaundice should be confirmed as being caused by stent occlusion by imaging or ERC
2. Death
3. Uneventful follow-up for 12 months

Evaluation:

The primary aim will be to compare the two groups for duration of stent patency.

The secondary aims will be:

1. To study any complications attributable to endo-biliary RFA
2. To study if there is any improvement in patient survival
3. To study if there is any improvement in patient's quality of life

Statistics:

We assume that the metal stent patency will improve from 50% to 80% at 6-8 months. With a 80% power and alpha error of 5%, we will need 43 patients in each arm. The Fisher exact test will be used to evaluate any differences in the patient distribution. The Student unpaired t test will be used to compare the laboratory tests, age and sex. Cumulative stent patency and patient survival will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Jaundice Extrahepatic Obstructive Disorder of Bile Duct Stent

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Experimental arm

Insertion and activation of the endo-biliary RF catheter at the site of the stricture before insertion of a Self-expandable Metal Stent (SEMS)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Endoscopic radio-frequency ablation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Endobiliary radiofrequency catheter is 8Fr in diameter and can easily be passed over a 0.035 guide wire through the biopsy channel of a duodenoscope at the time of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC). Its use in the biliary system was heralded by animal experiments following which power settings of 7-10 Watts for 2 minutes were found to provide adequate ablation. The ablation results in charring of the tumor and this is expected to enhance the patency of SEMS

Control arm

Insertion and sham activation of the endo-biliary RF catheter at the site of the stricture before insertion of a SEMS

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Endoscopic radio-frequency ablation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Endobiliary radiofrequency catheter is 8Fr in diameter and can easily be passed over a 0.035 guide wire through the biopsy channel of a duodenoscope at the time of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC). Its use in the biliary system was heralded by animal experiments following which power settings of 7-10 Watts for 2 minutes were found to provide adequate ablation. The ablation results in charring of the tumor and this is expected to enhance the patency of SEMS

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Endoscopic radio-frequency ablation

Endobiliary radiofrequency catheter is 8Fr in diameter and can easily be passed over a 0.035 guide wire through the biopsy channel of a duodenoscope at the time of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC). Its use in the biliary system was heralded by animal experiments following which power settings of 7-10 Watts for 2 minutes were found to provide adequate ablation. The ablation results in charring of the tumor and this is expected to enhance the patency of SEMS

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients: Clinical data and investigations suggestive of unresectable malignant bile duct obstruction. All patients will be discussed at the hepato-biliary multidisciplinary meeting which should come to a unanimous decision on tumor unresectability.
2. Age more than 18 years
3. Histologically/ Cytologically confirmed malignancy
4. Informed consent: The patient should voluntarily agree to participation and randomization. Oral and written information about the nature of the trial will be given to all patients considered for inclusion.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Informed consent not obtained or withdrawn
2. Extremely poor general condition not amenable for conscious sedation used for ERC
3. Candidate suitable for surgical resection
4. Klatskin type 4 tumor
5. Previous biliary intervention such as plastic stent insertion for more than 1 month
6. Any other contra-indication to ERC
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, India

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Asian Institute of Gastroenterology

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

D. Nageshwar Reddy, DM

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Asian Institute of Gastroenterology

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

D. Nageshwar Reddy

Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

India

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

AIG-GI-201101

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

A RCT of Low MBO Drainage Strategies
NCT06196164 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA