Outcomes After Laparoscopic Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy
NCT ID: NCT07328607
Last Updated: 2026-01-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
90 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2026-01-17
2028-04-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Minimally Invasive Pancreatico-duodenectomy
NCT02807701
Open Versus Total Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy
NCT06661135
Laparoscopic Versus Open Pancreatectomy
NCT00988793
Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy
NCT07009119
Outcomes in Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy
NCT02638818
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This study will randomize 90 eligible patients to receive either LPD or OPD. The primary objective is to compare overall morbidity using the Clavien-Dindo Classification at 90 days postoperative. Secondary objectives include assessment of oncologic outcomes (lymph node harvest, margin status), perioperative metrics (operative time, blood loss), and postoperative recovery (length of stay, readmissions). The study utilizes a prospectively maintained database and adheres to CONSORT guidelines.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD)
Patients randomized to receive standard open pancreaticoduodenectomy through a bilateral subcostal incision.
Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy
Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy with lymphadenectomy and reconstruction via open technique.
Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD)
Patients randomized to receive total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy using a standardized six-port technique.
Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy
Minimally invasive Whipple procedure using 6 trocars, with specimen extraction via Pfannenstiel incision.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy
Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy with lymphadenectomy and reconstruction via open technique.
Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy
Minimally invasive Whipple procedure using 6 trocars, with specimen extraction via Pfannenstiel incision.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Histologically confirmed or clinically suspected lesions of: Pancreatic head adenocarcinoma, Ampullary carcinoma, Distal cholangiocarcinoma, Duodenal adenocarcinoma, Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, or Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm(IPMN) .
* Resectable disease based on preoperative imaging.
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group(ECOG) performance status 0-2.
* American Society of Anesthesiologists(ASA )classification I-III.
* Patients able to provide informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
* Previous pancreatic surgery.
* Concurrent major abdominal procedures .
* ASA classification IV or higher.
* Metastatic disease identified preoperatively.
* Locally advanced unresectable disease.
* Active infection or sepsis at time of surgery.
* Severe cardiopulmonary comorbidities precluding major surgery.
* Pregnancy.
* Procedures requiring Total Pancreatectomy, Distal Pancreatectomy, or Enucleation .
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Minia University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Saleh Khairy Saleh MD
Lecturer
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Saleh K Saleh, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Minia University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Liver and GIT hospital , Minia University
Minya, Minya Governorate, Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Adam MA, Choudhury K, Dinan MA, Reed SD, Scheri RP, Blazer DG 3rd, Roman SA, Sosa JA. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Cancer: Practice Patterns and Short-term Outcomes Among 7061 Patients. Ann Surg. 2015 Aug;262(2):372-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001055.
Poves I, Burdio F, Morato O, Iglesias M, Radosevic A, Ilzarbe L, Visa L, Grande L. Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes Between Laparoscopic and Open Approach for Pancreatoduodenectomy: The PADULAP Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg. 2018 Nov;268(5):731-739. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002893.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1838/12/2025
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.