Impact of Physical Activity on Exercise Perceptions and Physical Self in Adults
NCT ID: NCT07047170
Last Updated: 2025-08-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
243 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2020-02-25
2023-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
1. Do healthy adults with different physical activity levels have different perceptions of exercise benefits/barriers?
2. Are there differences in physical self-perception of healthy adults with different physical activity levels? After being asked about their demographic information, healthy adults answered questions from the International Physical Activity Questionnaire, the Perception of Exercise Benefits/Barriers Questionnaire, and the Physical Self-perception Questionnaire.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Does Physical Activity Level Depend on Exercise Perception and Body Awareness
NCT04270227
The Effects of Physical Activity on Healthy Lifestyle, Self-Esteem and Psychological Well-Being
NCT06618950
Physical Activity Level and Physical Activity Awareness
NCT03743454
Assessment of Physical Activity Awareness Training in Healthy Young Adults
NCT06201845
A Randomized-controlled Trial of Social Norm Interventions to Increase Physical Activity
NCT02710201
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The International Physical Activity Survey Short Form (IPAC) presented in the appendix will be used for the activities of individuals. Physical Activity level is determined in 3 categories; Category I: Inactive ones: \<600 MET-min/wk Category II: Minimum Active: \>600 - 3000 MET-min/wk Category III: HEPA active ones: \<3000 MET-min/wk
Individuals' perceptions of exercise benefits/barriers will be assessed with the Exercise Benefit/Barrier Scale. The scale consists of a total of 43 items. The scale has 4 answers in the conditioned-choice Likert scale format, from 4 (strongly agree) to 1 (strongly disagree). The total score of the scale varies between 43-172. The scale has two subgroups, the Exercise Barrier Scale and the Exercise Benefit Scale. Each subgroup can be used independently. The score range of the benefit scale is between 29-116, and the score range of the barrier scale is between 14-56. The sum of all items in the scale gives the total score of the Exercise Benefit/Barrier scale. The higher the total scale score, the more the individual understands the benefits of exercise. The validity and reliability of this scale in Turkey was performed by Ortabağ, Ceylan, Akyüz and Bebiş.
The self-perception inventory will be used for individuals' self-perception. The inventory, which measures the person's 4 sub-dimensions (Athletic competence, physical condition, body attractiveness, strength) and general physical competence, consists of a total of 30 items, each sub-scale containing 6 items. The adaptation study of this inventory to Turkey was conducted by Aşçı and colleagues. For each item, the inventory presents the person with statements describing two different people and asks the person to determine the degree to which they resemble each of them. After first deciding which of the two different groups of people they resemble the most, the person grades this similarity using the expressions "Just right for me" or "Quite right for me". Scoring and calculation of the self-perception inventory; the items are scored between 1 and 4. "4" represents high competence, and "1" represents low competence. The inventory gives scores ranging from 6 to 24 in 5 different dimensions of physical perception.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
ECOLOGIC_OR_COMMUNITY
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group 1: Minimal Active Group (MAG)
Minimal Active Group
No interventions assigned to this group
Group 2: Inactive Group (IG)
Inactive Group
No interventions assigned to this group
Group 3: Very Active Group (CAG)
Very Active Group
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* have a cognitive problems,
* having a recent surgical operation
* were in COVID-19 quarantine,
* have a health problem that could affect their physical activity level,
* BMI \> 35 kg/m2.
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Uskudar University
OTHER
Istinye University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Elif Önder
Physical therapist
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
elif önder
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Istinye University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi, SUVAM Havza Fizik Tedavi ve Rehabilitasyon Merkezin
Samsun, Havza, Turkey (Türkiye)
Social Media
Samsun, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Prijatelj, K., Selak Bagarić, E., & Buljan Flander, G. (2022). Examination of Some Predictors of One's Physical Appearance, Life-Satisfaction and Self-Esteem in the Wider Context of Engaging in Fitness Programs. Socijalne teme: Časopis za pitanja socijalnog rada i srodnih znanosti, 1(9), 25-46.
Pulido JJ, Tapia-Serrano MA, Diaz-Garcia J, Ponce-Bordon JC, Lopez-Gajardo MA. The Relationship between Students' Physical Self-Concept and Their Physical Activity Levels and Sedentary Behavior: The Role of Students' Motivation. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 22;18(15):7775. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18157775.
Schilling R, Schmidt SCE, Fiedler J, Woll A. Associations between physical activity, physical fitness, and body composition in adults living in Germany: A cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2023 Oct 26;18(10):e0293555. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293555. eCollection 2023.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2020/666
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.