A Trial of an Affect-Guided Physical Activity Prescription

NCT ID: NCT02507869

Last Updated: 2015-07-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

67 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-04-30

Study Completion Date

2014-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Despite awareness of the benefits of engaging in regular physical activity, at least 50% of adults in the US do not meet recommended guidelines for physical activity. One potential explanation for this lack of regular physical activity is that people often experience exercise as affectively unpleasant. Evidence suggests that the more positively people experience exercise (i.e., the better they feel while exercising), the more likely they are to engage in regular physical activity. This may be especially true for people in poor cardiorespiratory condition. In this randomized trial, investigators compared the effects of an affect-guided exercise prescription (intervention) to a heart rate-guided exercise prescription (control) on change in physical activity minutes among previously underactive adults. Investigators also tested whether the effect of the intervention was moderated by differences in cardiorespiratory fitness.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Regular physical activity has many benefits for overall health and well-being, and current public health guidelines recommend at least 150 minutes per week of moderate-to-vigorous intensity activity to attain these benefits. Despite the many benefits of regular activity, the majority of adults in the US fail to meet recommendations for regular physical activity. One potential explanation for suboptimal levels of physical activity is that exercise is often experienced as affectively unpleasant. Recent work has demonstrated that the more positive people feel during exercise, the more likely they are to engage in regular physical activity. Affective response to exercise is modulated by the intensity of the activity: at a vigorous intensity, affective response is almost uniformly negative and unpleasant, whereas at a moderate intensity, there is more inter-individual variability in affective response. Whether the intensity of the exercise is self-selected or imposed also influences the affective response to exercise, with self-selected intensities being experienced as more pleasant. Current recommendations for engaging in physical activity focus on the type of training intensities most likely to result in a negative affective response. The purpose of this pilot trial was to test the effects of an exercise prescription focused on the maintenance of positive affect during exercise. Investigators randomized participants to one of two exercise prescription conditions: (1) an affect-guided prescription focused on maintaining a positive affective response (intervention), and (2) a heart rate-guided prescription focused on maintaining a moderate intensity (control). Investigators tested the effects of these two exercise prescriptions on changes in subsequent physical activity after one week and one month among a sample of underactive adults. Investigators also tested whether the effect of the intervention was moderated by differences in cardiorespiratory fitness.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Physical Activity

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Affect-Guided Prescription

Intervention: Participants in the affect-guided condition are instructed to exercise while monitoring how they feel, and to adjust the intensity of their exercise to maintain a pleasant affective response.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Positive affective response

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants adjust the intensity of their exercise to maintain a pleasant affective response.

Heart Rate-Guided Prescription

Intervention: Participants in the heart rate-guided condition are instructed to exercise while monitoring their heart rate, and to adjust the intensity of the exercise to maintain a heart rate in the moderate range (64-76% of their HRmax).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Moderate-intensity heart rate

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants adjust the intensity of the exercise to maintain a heart rate in the moderate range (64-76% of their HRmax).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Positive affective response

Participants adjust the intensity of their exercise to maintain a pleasant affective response.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Moderate-intensity heart rate

Participants adjust the intensity of the exercise to maintain a heart rate in the moderate range (64-76% of their HRmax).

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Physically underactive individuals (\< 60 minutes of physical activity/week).

Exclusion Criteria

* Presence of cardiovascular disease, pulmonary disease, or hypertension.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Southern Methodist University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Austin Baldwin

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Austin Baldwin, Ph.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Southern Methodist University

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ekkekakis P, Lind E. Exercise does not feel the same when you are overweight: the impact of self-selected and imposed intensity on affect and exertion. Int J Obes (Lond). 2006 Apr;30(4):652-60. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803052.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16130028 (View on PubMed)

Ekkekakis P, Parfitt G, Petruzzello SJ. The pleasure and displeasure people feel when they exercise at different intensities: decennial update and progress towards a tripartite rationale for exercise intensity prescription. Sports Med. 2011 Aug 1;41(8):641-71. doi: 10.2165/11590680-000000000-00000.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21780850 (View on PubMed)

Ekkekakis P, Lind E, Vazou S. Affective responses to increasing levels of exercise intensity in normal-weight, overweight, and obese middle-aged women. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2010 Jan;18(1):79-85. doi: 10.1038/oby.2009.204. Epub 2009 Jun 25.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19556979 (View on PubMed)

Parfitt G, Alrumh A, Rowlands AV. Affect-regulated exercise intensity: does training at an intensity that feels 'good' improve physical health? J Sci Med Sport. 2012 Nov;15(6):548-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2012.01.005. Epub 2012 May 31.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22658587 (View on PubMed)

Williams DM, Dunsiger S, Jennings EG, Marcus BH. Does affective valence during and immediately following a 10-min walk predict concurrent and future physical activity? Ann Behav Med. 2012 Aug;44(1):43-51. doi: 10.1007/s12160-012-9362-9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22532005 (View on PubMed)

Williams DM, Dunsiger S, Miranda R Jr, Gwaltney CJ, Emerson JA, Monti PM, Parisi AF. Recommending self-paced exercise among overweight and obese adults: a randomized pilot study. Ann Behav Med. 2015 Apr;49(2):280-5. doi: 10.1007/s12160-014-9642-7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25223963 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2012-098-SMIJ

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Multiphase Activity Promotion Study
NCT02592590 COMPLETED NA
Web-based Physical Activity Program
NCT01218412 UNKNOWN PHASE1
The Psychology of Physical Activity
NCT02538068 COMPLETED NA