MEP Up-conditioning to Target Corticospinal Plasticity

NCT ID: NCT06989905

Last Updated: 2025-05-31

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

EARLY_PHASE1

Total Enrollment

11 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-05-27

Study Completion Date

2027-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Individuals with chronic cervical spinal cord injury will complete a 10-week training protocol where participants receive non-invasive brain stimulation and feedback on the size of the corresponding muscle response (wrist extensor).

Investigators will assess the impact of the brain stimulation training on 1) the brain-to-spinal cord-to-muscle connection and 2) motor functions of the arm and hand. Also, brain and spine magnetic resonance imaging will be collected before and after the training. The imaging measurements will tell investigators about how spinal damage, brain function, and brain structure relate to motor presentation and the response to the training.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Corticospinal function is essential in generating and controlling voluntary movements. Cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) disrupts corticospinal connections, therefore, often results in weak voluntary activation of muscles and impaired motor control in the upper limb (UL). An intervention that improves corticospinal function could enhance motor function recovery; however, such interventions are not currently readily available to people with incomplete SCI. Operant up-conditioning of a motor evoked potential (MEP) to transcranial magnetic stimulation (non- invasive brain stimulation) that can increase corticospinal excitability for the targeted muscle may be able to fill this gap. The overarching hypothesis is that targeting beneficial plasticity to the corticospinal pathway can change the brain and spinal cord and improve upper limb motor function in people with chronic cervical SCI. As initial steps towards testing this, the proposed project aims to apply MEP operant up-conditioning in the wrist extensor of the affected UL, improve corticospinal activation of the wrist extensor, and thereby improve motor functions in which the wrist is involved in individuals with cervical SCI. Recent studies suggest that MEP up- conditioning is feasible and can increase MEP size that reflects corticospinal excitability. Building on those studies, this project will examine the effects of wrist extensor MEP operant up-conditioning in people with chronic cervical SCI. Individuals with weak wrist extension due to incomplete cervical SCI will undergo a standard MEP up-conditioning protocol (6 baseline and 24 up-conditioning sessions over 10 weeks). Before and after the intervention period, neurophysiological measurements, clinical and functional assessments, neuroimaging of the spinal cord and brain will be performed. The results will facilitate development and clinical translation of MEP operant conditioning as a novel non-invasive therapy that may complement other therapies and further enhance motor function recovery in people with SCI or other disorders.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Spinal Cord Injury Tetraplegia/Tetraparesis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Operant Up-Conditioning of the Motor Evoked Potential

The intervention consists of approximately 6 baseline sessions and 24 conditioning sessions at a pace of 3 sessions/week, 1-2 hour duration, over 10 weeks. At the beginning of each session, electromyographic (EMG) recording and nerve stimulating electrodes are placed over the arm. In all sessions, motor evoked potentials (MEPs) will be measured while the sitting subject provides a pre-set level of background muscle EMG with joint angles fixed. In 225 control trials of each baseline sessions and the first 20 trials of conditioning sessions the subject will receive no feedback as to MEP size (i.e., control MEPs). In 225 conditioning trials of each conditioning session, the subject will be encouraged to increase the target muscle MEP, and will receive immediate feedback as to whether MEP size was above a criterion (i.e., whether the trial was a success).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Up-conditioning of the wrist extensor motor evoked potential

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

At the beginning of each session, EMG recording and nerve stimulating electrodes are placed over the arm. In all sessions, MEPs will be measured while the sitting subject provides a pre-set level of background muscle EMG with joint angles fixed. In 225 control trials of each baseline sessions and the first 20 trials of conditioning sessions the subject will receive no feedback as to MEP size (i.e., control MEPs). In 225 conditioning trials of each conditioning session, the subject will be encouraged to increase the target muscle MEP, and will receive immediate feedback as to whether MEP size was above a criterion (i.e., whether the trial was a success).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Up-conditioning of the wrist extensor motor evoked potential

At the beginning of each session, EMG recording and nerve stimulating electrodes are placed over the arm. In all sessions, MEPs will be measured while the sitting subject provides a pre-set level of background muscle EMG with joint angles fixed. In 225 control trials of each baseline sessions and the first 20 trials of conditioning sessions the subject will receive no feedback as to MEP size (i.e., control MEPs). In 225 conditioning trials of each conditioning session, the subject will be encouraged to increase the target muscle MEP, and will receive immediate feedback as to whether MEP size was above a criterion (i.e., whether the trial was a success).

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult (≥18 yrs old)
* A history of injury to spinal cord at or above C6
* \>6 months post SCI
* Weak wrist extension at least unilaterally
* Expectation that current medication will be maintained without change for at least 3 months. Stable use of anti-spasticity medication (e.g., baclofen, diazepam, tizanidine) is accepted.

Exclusion Criteria

* Motoneuron injury
* Medically unstable condition
* Cognitive impairment
* A history of epileptic seizures
* Metal implants in the cranium
* Implanted biomedical device in or above the chest (e.g., a cardiac pacemaker, cochlear implant)
* Extensive use of functional electrical stimulation to the arm on a daily basis
* Pregnancy (due to changes in posture and potential medical instability)
* Contraindications to MRI
* No measurable MEP elicited in the ECR
* Unable to produce any voluntary ECR EMG activity
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Doscher Neurorehabilitation Research Program

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Medical University of South Carolina

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Allison Lewis

Post-doctoral Scholar, Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Allison Lewis, DPT, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Medical University of South Carolina

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Medical University of South Carolina

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Recruitment Contact

Role: CONTACT

843-792-6313

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Allison Lewis, DPT, PhD

Role: primary

843-792-6313

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1K99HD117041

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

Pro00138869

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Spinal Cord Stimulation and Training
NCT05472584 RECRUITING NA
Spinal Cord Associative Plasticity Study
NCT05163639 RECRUITING EARLY_PHASE1
Rebuilding Inter-limb Transfer in Cervical SCI
NCT06440538 RECRUITING EARLY_PHASE1