Transcutaneous Electrical Spinal Cord Stimulation for Lower Limbs

NCT ID: NCT01949285

Last Updated: 2017-01-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

10 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-06-30

Study Completion Date

2016-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is to determine if non-invasive electrical stimulation of the spinal cord can be used to: 1) assess spared function following a spinal cord injury; and 2) be use for rehabilitation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study is to determine if non-invasive electrical stimulation of the spinal cord can be used to: 1) assess spared function following a spinal cord injury; and 2) be use for rehabilitation.

The investigators hypothesize that this type of stimulation can be used to locate and determine if any spinal (nerve) pathways or connections were spared following a spinal cord injury. We also hypothesize the same stimulation can help revive or recover function to muscles connected to these spared spinal (nerve) pathways in individuals who are clinically paralyzed. Our research has demonstrated that modifying the activation state of the spinal cord after an injury, or awakening the spinal cord, can benefit people with paralysis years after a spinal cord injury. This method and device have not yet been approved by the FDA for the treatment of paralysis and are under investigation. This study if successful will help provide further evidence that could be use to one day to gain FDA approval.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Spinal Cord Injury

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Grp#1: sham stimulation

Group #1: Baseline clinical assessment; followed by two weeks training with no stimulation; then four weeks training + sham Transcutaneous Electrical Spinal Cord Stimulation; followed by repeat clinical assessment; then four weeks training + effective non-sham Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation; repeat clinical assessment.

Secondary outcome measurements: assess ability to stand with and without stimulation using a stance frame support; assess trunk function (core stability) with and without stimulation

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Transcutaneous Electrical Spinal Cord Stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

A prototype device that non-invasively delivers electrical stimulation to the spinal cord will be used to assess and rehabilitate spared spinal cord function.

Grp#2: Control

Group #2: Baseline clinical assessment; followed by two weeks training with no Transcutaneous Electrical Spinal Cord Stimulation; then four weeks training + effective Transcutaneous Electrical Spinal Cord Stimulation; followed by repeat clinical assessment.

Secondary outcome measurements: assess ability to stand with and without stimulation using a stance frame support; assess trunk function (core stability) with and without stimulation

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Transcutaneous Electrical Spinal Cord Stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

A prototype device that non-invasively delivers electrical stimulation to the spinal cord will be used to assess and rehabilitate spared spinal cord function.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Transcutaneous Electrical Spinal Cord Stimulation

A prototype device that non-invasively delivers electrical stimulation to the spinal cord will be used to assess and rehabilitate spared spinal cord function.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Prototype Device

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Spinal cord injury 1 or more years prior
* Non progressive cervical or thoracic SCI
* Half of key muscles below neurological level having a motor score of less than 2/5
* Ability to commit to home exercises and 16 week participation
* Stable medical condition without cardiopulmonary disease or dysautonomia that would contraindicate participation in lower extremity rehabilitation or testing activities
* Not dependent on ventilation support
* No painful musculoskeletal dysfunction, unhealed fracture, pressure sore, or urinary tract infection that might interfere with lower extremity rehabilitation or testing activities
* No clinically significant depression or ongoing drug abuse
* Adequate social support network to be able to participate in weekly training and assessment sessions for the duration of the 16 week study period
* No current anti-spasticity regimen
* Must not have received botox injections in the prior six months
* Be unable to use lower extremity for functional tasks

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnancy
* No functional segmental reflexes below the lesion
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of California, Los Angeles

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

California Institute of Technology

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

NeuroEnabling Technologies, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Victor R Edgerton, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University of California, Los Angeles

Nicholas A Terrafranca, DPM

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

NeuroEnabling Technologies, Inc.

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of California Los Angeles

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NETI201309

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

tACS for Neuropathic Pain Management After SCI
NCT06029075 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA