Transcutaneous Electrical Spinal Cord Stimulation for Lower Limbs
NCT ID: NCT01949285
Last Updated: 2017-01-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
10 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-06-30
2016-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Restoring Arm and Hand Function With Non-invasive Spinal Stimulation
NCT01906424
Transcutaneous Spinal Stimulation and Exercise for Locomotion
NCT03509558
Non-invasive Spinal Cord Stimulation After Spinal Cord Injury
NCT06260735
Epidural Stimulation for Upper Extremity Function
NCT06437548
Transcutaneous Electrical Spinal Stimulation to Restore Upper Extremity Functions in Spinal Cord Injury
NCT03184792
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The investigators hypothesize that this type of stimulation can be used to locate and determine if any spinal (nerve) pathways or connections were spared following a spinal cord injury. We also hypothesize the same stimulation can help revive or recover function to muscles connected to these spared spinal (nerve) pathways in individuals who are clinically paralyzed. Our research has demonstrated that modifying the activation state of the spinal cord after an injury, or awakening the spinal cord, can benefit people with paralysis years after a spinal cord injury. This method and device have not yet been approved by the FDA for the treatment of paralysis and are under investigation. This study if successful will help provide further evidence that could be use to one day to gain FDA approval.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
BASIC_SCIENCE
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Grp#1: sham stimulation
Group #1: Baseline clinical assessment; followed by two weeks training with no stimulation; then four weeks training + sham Transcutaneous Electrical Spinal Cord Stimulation; followed by repeat clinical assessment; then four weeks training + effective non-sham Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation; repeat clinical assessment.
Secondary outcome measurements: assess ability to stand with and without stimulation using a stance frame support; assess trunk function (core stability) with and without stimulation
Transcutaneous Electrical Spinal Cord Stimulation
A prototype device that non-invasively delivers electrical stimulation to the spinal cord will be used to assess and rehabilitate spared spinal cord function.
Grp#2: Control
Group #2: Baseline clinical assessment; followed by two weeks training with no Transcutaneous Electrical Spinal Cord Stimulation; then four weeks training + effective Transcutaneous Electrical Spinal Cord Stimulation; followed by repeat clinical assessment.
Secondary outcome measurements: assess ability to stand with and without stimulation using a stance frame support; assess trunk function (core stability) with and without stimulation
Transcutaneous Electrical Spinal Cord Stimulation
A prototype device that non-invasively delivers electrical stimulation to the spinal cord will be used to assess and rehabilitate spared spinal cord function.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Transcutaneous Electrical Spinal Cord Stimulation
A prototype device that non-invasively delivers electrical stimulation to the spinal cord will be used to assess and rehabilitate spared spinal cord function.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Non progressive cervical or thoracic SCI
* Half of key muscles below neurological level having a motor score of less than 2/5
* Ability to commit to home exercises and 16 week participation
* Stable medical condition without cardiopulmonary disease or dysautonomia that would contraindicate participation in lower extremity rehabilitation or testing activities
* Not dependent on ventilation support
* No painful musculoskeletal dysfunction, unhealed fracture, pressure sore, or urinary tract infection that might interfere with lower extremity rehabilitation or testing activities
* No clinically significant depression or ongoing drug abuse
* Adequate social support network to be able to participate in weekly training and assessment sessions for the duration of the 16 week study period
* No current anti-spasticity regimen
* Must not have received botox injections in the prior six months
* Be unable to use lower extremity for functional tasks
Exclusion Criteria
* No functional segmental reflexes below the lesion
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of California, Los Angeles
OTHER
California Institute of Technology
OTHER
NeuroEnabling Technologies, Inc.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Victor R Edgerton, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
University of California, Los Angeles
Nicholas A Terrafranca, DPM
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
NeuroEnabling Technologies, Inc.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of California Los Angeles
Los Angeles, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NETI201309
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.