Neural Plasticity and Motor Recovery After Upper Extremity Motor Training in People With c-SCI
NCT ID: NCT06065384
Last Updated: 2025-12-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
44 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-10-09
2027-08-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Rebuilding Inter-limb Transfer in Cervical SCI
NCT06440538
Upper Limb Activity in Human SCI Rehabilitation
NCT02098122
Investigating the Upper Limb During the First 6 Months After Sustaining a Cervical Spinal Cord Injury,
NCT06740279
Linking Brain to Behaviour Research in SCI
NCT01963026
Enhancing Recovery in Non-Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury
NCT03320759
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Paralysis or paralysis is the most common effect of spinal cord injury (SCI) on individuals. Paralysis affects the ability to walk, perform self-care, live independently and participate in work and leisure activities. In individuals with cervical spinal cord injury, arm and hand function is very important. The most promising and easily implemented intervention that could promote neurological recovery and make a lasting difference in the lives of people with spinal cord injuries is early and intensive motor training aimed at recovery below the injury level. This intervention takes advantage of the early plasticity of the nervous system. By maximizing muscle activation in the first few weeks after injury, we can target the nervous system's unique capacity for neural plasticity where changes can occur in central and peripheral motor systems.
Objective of the study:
This project aims to investigate peripheral and central neuroplasticity following an early (\<13 weeks after injury) and intensive (8 weeks of 6 hours of additional therapy) upper extremity motor training program (EIUMT) aimed at recovery below the lesion level. This project has 4 objectives: to investigate 1) central neural plasticity (identify changes in cortical neuroplasticity and corticospinal excitability; 2) peripheral neural plasticity (identify change in axonal excitability and number of motor units); 3) clinical motor recovery of the upper limbs and 4) relationships between dose dimensions of motor intervention and clinical and neurophysiological outcome measures after EIUMT. Advanced neurophysiological measurements and clinical measurements will be taken before and after EIUMT and at 6-month follow-up.
Study design:
a multicenter pragmatic randomised controlled study in 2 countries
Study population:
44 persons with cervical spinal cord injury (22 participants in the control and intervention groups) Inclusion criteria: Individuals are eligible to participate if they have suffered a traumatic or non-traumatic cervical spinal cord injury within the previous 13 weeks, have AIS (ASIA Impairment Scale) A lesion with motor function more than three levels below motor level (on one or both sides) or have AIS C or AIS D lesion (as defined by the International Standards for the Neurological Classification of spinal cord injury), are older than 16 years of age, have received permission to begin rehabilitation and are likely to remain an inpatient for the next 8 weeks.
Exclusion criteria: Participants will be excluded if they have a significant medical or physical condition or psychiatric illness that could prevent the person from participating in the study or would place the person at unacceptable risk if they were to participate.
Intervention:
The intervention group receives 6 hours of motor training each week. This involves active and targeted motor training of all affected muscles below the injury level in the context of functional activities.
The control group receives only standard rehabilitation and care.
Primary study parameters/outcome of the study (Baseline vs 8 weeks after randomisation):
Central plasticity via: Single pulse TMS (transcranial magnetic stimulation) (Resting Motor Threshold) Peripheral plasticity via: Peripheral nerve assessment (Compound muscle action potential (CMAP)) Functional recovery via: Grades redefined assessment of strength, sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP)
Secondary study parameters/outcome of the study:
Clinical Measures: Upper Extremity Motor Score, Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SClM-selfcare); Van Lieshout Test (VLT); Hand-Held Dynamometry; accelerometry (session density: active therapy time/session length); perceived difficulty and exertion) Central plasticity: Single Pulse TMS: Stimulus-Response Function, Cortical mapping, Paired pulse TMS: SICI (short interval intracortical inhibition); LICI (long interval intracortical inhibition) Peripheral plasticity: NET (Nerve excitability testing) and MScanFit MUNE.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
intensive upper limb training
The intervention group receives 6 hours of motor training each week upon usual care during 8 weeks. This involves active and targeted motor training of all affected muscles below the injury level in the context of functional activities.
experimental group: intensive motor training
Intervention group: receive an extra 6 hours of motor training each week (distributed over the week) for 8 weeks. It will involve active and targeted motor training of all affected muscles of the upper limb below the level of the injury within the context of practice of functional activities. Interventions will be goal directed and individualized to the needs of each participant with a focus on training that addresses each person's specific motor problem, promoting motor learning as well as stimulating neural plasticity. All patients will continue to receive usual physiotherapy and usual rehabilitation.
usual care
The control group receives only standard rehabilitation and care
usual care
usual rehabilitation
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
experimental group: intensive motor training
Intervention group: receive an extra 6 hours of motor training each week (distributed over the week) for 8 weeks. It will involve active and targeted motor training of all affected muscles of the upper limb below the level of the injury within the context of practice of functional activities. Interventions will be goal directed and individualized to the needs of each participant with a focus on training that addresses each person's specific motor problem, promoting motor learning as well as stimulating neural plasticity. All patients will continue to receive usual physiotherapy and usual rehabilitation.
usual care
usual rehabilitation
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
16 Years
90 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Research Foundation Flanders
OTHER
University of Aarhus
OTHER
University of Sydney
OTHER
University Hospital, Ghent
OTHER
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
OTHER
Adelante, Centre of Expertise in Rehabilitation and Audiology
OTHER
Rehabilitation Hospital RevArte
UNKNOWN
Annemie Spooren
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Annemie Spooren
Prof. Annemie Spooren
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Annemie Spooren, Prof. Dr.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hasselt University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Revalidatieziekenhuis RevArte
Antwerp, , Belgium
UZGent
Ghent, , Belgium
UZLeuven Campus Pellenberg
Leuven, , Belgium
Zorggroep Adelante
Hoensbroek, , Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Kristine Oostra, Prof. Dr.
Role: primary
Koen Peers, Prof. Dr.
Role: primary
Charlotte Van Laake, dr.
Role: primary
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
REPAIR-SCI_UH
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.