Neural Plasticity and Motor Recovery After Upper Extremity Motor Training in People With c-SCI

NCT ID: NCT06065384

Last Updated: 2025-12-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

44 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-10-09

Study Completion Date

2027-08-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

After spinal cord injury (SCI), there is a disruption in neural circuits resulting in paralysis. There is not yet a cure for paralysis. In persons with Cervical SCI (pwC-SCI) recovery of arm-hand function is very important as it has a significant impact on the patients' level of independence and quality of life. Recovery is assumed to involve alterations in both central and peripheral motor systems. Motor training at an intensive dosage potentially provides a powerful stimulus for neurological recovery. This project exploits the peripheral and central neuroplastic effect of an early (\<13 weeks after injury) and intensive (8 weeks of 6 hours in addition to usual care) upper limb motor training program (EIUMT) directed at recovery below the level of the injury in pwC-SCI within an international multi-center randomized controlled trial including 44 pwC-SCI. It has 4 objectives: to investigate 1)central neural plasticity by identifying alterations in cortical neuroplasticity and corticospinal excitability; 2)peripheral neural plasticity by identifying alterations in axonal excitability and number of motor units; 3)behavioral motor recovery of upper limb and 4)relationships between dose dimensions of motor intervention and behavioral and neurophysiological outcome measures after EIUMT. Cutting-edge neurophysiological measures are used to provide insight in the mechanism of neuroplasticity after EIUMT and will be taken before and after EIUMT and at 6 months follow-up.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background of the study:

Paralysis or paralysis is the most common effect of spinal cord injury (SCI) on individuals. Paralysis affects the ability to walk, perform self-care, live independently and participate in work and leisure activities. In individuals with cervical spinal cord injury, arm and hand function is very important. The most promising and easily implemented intervention that could promote neurological recovery and make a lasting difference in the lives of people with spinal cord injuries is early and intensive motor training aimed at recovery below the injury level. This intervention takes advantage of the early plasticity of the nervous system. By maximizing muscle activation in the first few weeks after injury, we can target the nervous system's unique capacity for neural plasticity where changes can occur in central and peripheral motor systems.

Objective of the study:

This project aims to investigate peripheral and central neuroplasticity following an early (\<13 weeks after injury) and intensive (8 weeks of 6 hours of additional therapy) upper extremity motor training program (EIUMT) aimed at recovery below the lesion level. This project has 4 objectives: to investigate 1) central neural plasticity (identify changes in cortical neuroplasticity and corticospinal excitability; 2) peripheral neural plasticity (identify change in axonal excitability and number of motor units); 3) clinical motor recovery of the upper limbs and 4) relationships between dose dimensions of motor intervention and clinical and neurophysiological outcome measures after EIUMT. Advanced neurophysiological measurements and clinical measurements will be taken before and after EIUMT and at 6-month follow-up.

Study design:

a multicenter pragmatic randomised controlled study in 2 countries

Study population:

44 persons with cervical spinal cord injury (22 participants in the control and intervention groups) Inclusion criteria: Individuals are eligible to participate if they have suffered a traumatic or non-traumatic cervical spinal cord injury within the previous 13 weeks, have AIS (ASIA Impairment Scale) A lesion with motor function more than three levels below motor level (on one or both sides) or have AIS C or AIS D lesion (as defined by the International Standards for the Neurological Classification of spinal cord injury), are older than 16 years of age, have received permission to begin rehabilitation and are likely to remain an inpatient for the next 8 weeks.

Exclusion criteria: Participants will be excluded if they have a significant medical or physical condition or psychiatric illness that could prevent the person from participating in the study or would place the person at unacceptable risk if they were to participate.

Intervention:

The intervention group receives 6 hours of motor training each week. This involves active and targeted motor training of all affected muscles below the injury level in the context of functional activities.

The control group receives only standard rehabilitation and care.

Primary study parameters/outcome of the study (Baseline vs 8 weeks after randomisation):

Central plasticity via: Single pulse TMS (transcranial magnetic stimulation) (Resting Motor Threshold) Peripheral plasticity via: Peripheral nerve assessment (Compound muscle action potential (CMAP)) Functional recovery via: Grades redefined assessment of strength, sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP)

Secondary study parameters/outcome of the study:

Clinical Measures: Upper Extremity Motor Score, Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SClM-selfcare); Van Lieshout Test (VLT); Hand-Held Dynamometry; accelerometry (session density: active therapy time/session length); perceived difficulty and exertion) Central plasticity: Single Pulse TMS: Stimulus-Response Function, Cortical mapping, Paired pulse TMS: SICI (short interval intracortical inhibition); LICI (long interval intracortical inhibition) Peripheral plasticity: NET (Nerve excitability testing) and MScanFit MUNE.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Spinal Cord Injuries

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

intensive upper limb training

The intervention group receives 6 hours of motor training each week upon usual care during 8 weeks. This involves active and targeted motor training of all affected muscles below the injury level in the context of functional activities.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

experimental group: intensive motor training

Intervention Type OTHER

Intervention group: receive an extra 6 hours of motor training each week (distributed over the week) for 8 weeks. It will involve active and targeted motor training of all affected muscles of the upper limb below the level of the injury within the context of practice of functional activities. Interventions will be goal directed and individualized to the needs of each participant with a focus on training that addresses each person's specific motor problem, promoting motor learning as well as stimulating neural plasticity. All patients will continue to receive usual physiotherapy and usual rehabilitation.

usual care

The control group receives only standard rehabilitation and care

Group Type OTHER

usual care

Intervention Type OTHER

usual rehabilitation

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

experimental group: intensive motor training

Intervention group: receive an extra 6 hours of motor training each week (distributed over the week) for 8 weeks. It will involve active and targeted motor training of all affected muscles of the upper limb below the level of the injury within the context of practice of functional activities. Interventions will be goal directed and individualized to the needs of each participant with a focus on training that addresses each person's specific motor problem, promoting motor learning as well as stimulating neural plasticity. All patients will continue to receive usual physiotherapy and usual rehabilitation.

Intervention Type OTHER

usual care

usual rehabilitation

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Traumatic or non-traumatic C-SCI in the preceding 13 weeks; age over 16 years; have an incomplete SCI categorized as AIS C or D or an AIS A SCI with zones of partial motor paralysis (as defined by the International Standards for the Neurological Classification of SCI (ISNCI) and medically stable.

Exclusion Criteria

* SCI with ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS) A without zones of partial preservation (decided based on former studies) and expertise of the team; SCI with any significant medical condition that could prevent the person from participating. Patients will be excluded from the measures of central plasticity in the presence of contraindications for TMS application such as epilepsy, metal implants in the brain, defibrillator, pacemaker, and pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

16 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Research Foundation Flanders

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Aarhus

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Sydney

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Hospital, Ghent

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Adelante, Centre of Expertise in Rehabilitation and Audiology

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Rehabilitation Hospital RevArte

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Annemie Spooren

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Annemie Spooren

Prof. Annemie Spooren

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Annemie Spooren, Prof. Dr.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hasselt University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Revalidatieziekenhuis RevArte

Antwerp, , Belgium

Site Status RECRUITING

UZGent

Ghent, , Belgium

Site Status RECRUITING

UZLeuven Campus Pellenberg

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Zorggroep Adelante

Hoensbroek, , Netherlands

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium Netherlands

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Annemie Spooren, Prof. Dr.

Role: CONTACT

Lisa Tedesco Triccas, Prof. Dr.

Role: CONTACT

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Nathalie Vaes

Role: primary

+32 3 210 60 95

Kristine Oostra, Prof. Dr.

Role: primary

Koen Peers, Prof. Dr.

Role: primary

Charlotte Van Laake, dr.

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

REPAIR-SCI_UH

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.