Comparing Outcomes of Elbow Extension Tendon Transfers

NCT ID: NCT01204736

Last Updated: 2016-03-08

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

14 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-08-31

Study Completion Date

2015-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Active elbow extension has significant functional benefits for individuals with tetraplegia. The proposed work will provide information to assess how effectively people are using their elbow extension tendon transfers, and whether one surgery works more effectively than the other. This study will provide recommendations to clinicians about the possibility of improving function after surgery using rehab techniques.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Voluntary control of elbow extension significantly improves functional abilities for individuals with tetraplegia. As a result, surgical reconstruction of elbow extension via tendon transfer is considered a fundamental intervention that benefits the patient, even if other tendon transfers aimed at improving hand function are never performed. Presently, there are two common tendon transfer surgeries used to restore elbow extension following spinal cord injury. These are the posterior deltoid to triceps transfer and the biceps to triceps transfer. Both surgeries significantly improve voluntary elbow extension, although there is variability in the amount of control that is restored among patients. This study will directly compare the performance of the posterior deltoid transfer to the biceps transfer with regard to: voluntary elbow extension strength, the ability to activate the transfer, and neural factors associated with voluntary and involuntary control of individual muscles. These comparisons will be made in functionally relevant postures and will provide fundamental information that will improve clinical understanding of the capacity of each of these two procedures to restore elbow extension.

The fundamental hypothesis of this proposal is that an inability to maximally activate the transferred posterior deltoid and the transferred biceps significantly limits the elbow extension moment that can be produced.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cervical Spinal Cord Injury

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group 1

Subjects with posterior deltoid-to-triceps tendon transfers

No interventions assigned to this group

Group 2

Subjects with biceps-to-triceps tendon transfers

No interventions assigned to this group

Group 3

Subjects with cervical SCI who have not had tendon transfers

No interventions assigned to this group

Group 4

Unimpaired control subjects

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Cervical Spinal Cord Injury (C5-C7)
* Posterior Deltoid to Triceps Tendon Transfer at least one year post-surgery
* Biceps to Triceps Tendon Transfer at least one year post-surgery

Exclusion Criteria

* Subjects will be excluded from the studies if there is presence of concurrent severe medical illness, including:

* unhealed decubiti
* use of baclofen pumps
* existing infection
* cardiovascular disease
* significant osteoporosis (as indicated by a history of fractures following injury)
* or a history of pulmonary complications or autonomic dysreflexia
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Shirley Ryan AbilityLab

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Northwestern University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Case Western Reserve University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Loyola University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

MetroHealth System, Ohio

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

VA Office of Research and Development

FED

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Wendy M Murray, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Edward Hines Jr. VA Hospital, Hines, IL

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Edward Hines Jr. VA Hospital, Hines, IL

Hines, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

B7515-R

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Hand Function for Tetraplegia
NCT00890916 COMPLETED NA
Reanimation in Tetraplegia
NCT01997125 COMPLETED NA
Rebuilding Inter-limb Transfer in Cervical SCI
NCT06440538 RECRUITING EARLY_PHASE1