Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
50 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-05-08
2026-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The researches will examine the brain regions using Magnetoencephalography (MEG) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). MEG and MRI are both non-invasive functional brain imaging technologies. MRI collects structural information and creates images of the brain while MEG collects magnetic activity from neurons, visualized as brain waves. The MRI machine uses a large magnet to help create images while MEG captures the fluctuations in the small magnetic fields resulting from brain's activity. Participants will also undergo a clinical and neurocognitive assessments.
This project design involves 50 individuals who will take part in the study; 25 affected and 25 healthy volunteers aged 18 to 50 years.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of Neuropsychiatric Patients and Healthy Volunteers
NCT00004571
Time,Self and Spontaneous Mental Activities in Patients With Psychotic Disorders
NCT02765880
Electrophysiology and Blood Flow in Patients With Schizophrenia and Their Siblings
NCT00001921
Database Registry for Neural Network Biomarkers in Psychosis
NCT01409109
Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain in Emotional Processing
NCT00061204
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Pathophysiological enquiries into schizophrenia to date suggest that it is a disorder of dysconnectivity in both spatial and temporal dimensions, with both being related to neurochemical aberrations such as subcortical dopamine excess. In other words, the relationship among various parts of the brain constituting networks (a spatial dimension) appears to be notably affected. This occurs in conjunction with a disruption in the moment-to-moment physiological continuity, or temporal irregularity, in neuronal activity. The spatial disconnect is well captured using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while the temporal irregularity can be studied using oscillatory patterns in the electroencephalography (EEG). In more recent times, the capability to concurrently study both spatial and temporal dysconnectivity has emerged from the use of magnetoencephalography (MEG), while non-invasive proxy measurements of dopamine function are feasible from short anatomical scans.
In the era of precision medicine, individual characterisation of the disease can support both diagnosis and treatment response. Magnetoencephalography (MEG) has shown to be a powerful tool to study the underpinnings of verbal production using task-free and task-based paradigms. Recent data published by the Baillet lab have shed light on novel approaches to spectral brain mapping and speech impairment quantification to characterize the functional neural pathology contributing to speech impairment in patients with Parkinson's disease. A previous study has demonstrated the feasibility of identifying individual specific patterns, termed 'brain fingerprints', in healthy participants using MEG for as short as 30 seconds. Recovering specific neural patterns from brief non-invasive recordings is very promising for the study of psychosis, however, no prior studies have investigated the spectral and connectome fingerprint of patients with schizophrenia. In addition to characterizing the speech abnormalities prevalent in patients with schizophrenia, identifying individual markers of temporal connectivity will enable us to understand the mechanism behind disorganised language in psychosis.
It has been shown that healthy individuals exposed to asynchronous audiovisual stimuli (i.e., out of the expected similar timing) undergo a rapid neural tuning or resetting (temporal recalibration). This relevant physiological mechanism is linked to our response to dynamic changing environments, such as speech comprehension. Previous research has shown that multisensory integration is impaired in schizophrenia; however, no previous studies have tried to dissect the temporal and spatial oscillatory mechanisms through which this phenomenon occurs and whether the degree of desynchrony correlates to psychotic symptoms.
Previous studies have also identified synchronized neural oscillatory activity as one of the physiological mechanisms underlying the hierarchical and integrative process of language production in healthy state. In line with these findings, research studies have suggested that beta oscillatory activity are involved in language production. Brain oscillations in the alpha and beta frequency ranges are considered as indices of sensorimotor integration in speech perception and production. Previous findings in healthy participants with high schizotypy (a trait that is related to the construct of schizophrenia) and patients with schizophrenia have led to the hypothesis that beta oscillatory dysfunction are key contributors to the mechanism of symptom formation and persistence in schizophrenia. Beta oscillations are thought to play a key role in the maintenance of prior context that is essential for coherent motor action and speech production; when this is disrupted, speech may contain words that are 'out-of-context' i.e., lower predictability for a given context . In particular, beta-band oscillations appear to 'carry the predictions' about the ongoing context, thus mediating top-down interactions between motor and frontotemporal language system during auditory listening tasks , by suppressing cortical responses to predicted sensory input. Inappropriate language area activity (resulting in disorganised speech) can thus be expected to arise from beta band deficits in schizophrenia.
Two key proofs are needed to further advance the hypothesis of beta deficits in schizophrenia: (1) Demonstrating beta-oscillatory deficits in patients with an established diagnosis of schizophrenia, especially in the language network that is thought to underlie FTD, and (2) Relating the specific patterns of temporal connectivity (spectral connectome) and irregularity (beta-oscillatory deficits) in the brain of affected individuals to objective measures of thought disorder using computerised analysis of speech.
PURPOSE The primary purpose of this study is to demonstrate that deficits in beta-band power in the motor cortex (elicited via a simple motor task of responding to a tone) and spectral similarity of language network (at rest) occur in schizophrenia. In patients with schizophrenia, the investigators expect these deficits to correlate with the degree of disorganisation measured as semantic predictability/coherence (by analysing recorded speech analysis).
HYPOTHESES Hypothesis 1: Beta-band oscillatory power (rebound from baseline after task execution) during a simple motor task in response to audiovisual stimuli is affected in schizophrenia.
Hypothesis 2: Across both patients and controls, the beta-rebound after motor task will correlate with coherent speech production (context-based semantic coherence or predictability) measured offline.
Hypothesis 3: Among patients with schizophrenia, the spectral maps for beta oscillatory frequency will show the greatest deviation from healthy controls in the frontotemporal language network.
The researchers also aim to explore if resting-state MEG connectomes across multiple frequency bands in schizophrenia display deviations from unaffected healthy subjects, if multisensory integration through rapid temporal recalibration is schizophrenia differs from that of healthy individuals, and if cortical structure (by measuring cortical thickness, and folding pattern) and subcortical profile of dopamine turnover (by measuring neuromelanin) relate to the MEG spectral deviations. The correlations obtained through the above-mentioned exploratory hypothesis will serve to estimate likely effect sizes to plan future larger studies.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Healthy controls
25 healthy volunteers; (1)English or French speeking, (2) Aged 18 to 50 years (group-matched with the patients for age (within 2 years), sex and parental occupational status, rated according to the National Statistics Socio-Economic Classification), (3) No personal or family history of psychotic disorder as defined by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) 5 criteria, (4) No history of head trauma, major neurological disorder (e.g., epilepsy) or somatic disorder with neurological complaints (e.g., multiple sclerosis), or intellectual disabilities, (5) No diagnosis of substance use disorder - current or in the preceding 1 year as defined by DSM 5, (6) suitable to undergo MRI scan, as per the safety screening questionnaire (not having metal in the body, not being pregnant or suffering from tinnitus).
No interventions assigned to this group
Patients
(1) English or French-speaking, (2) Aged 18-50 years, (3) Patients meeting the DSM 5 criteria for schizophrenia as previously diagnosed by their treating psychiatrist, (4) Patients in a stable phase of the illness (defined as having had no change in Global Functioning of greater than 10 units out of a total range of 100 units for 1 month before the MEG scan), assessed using the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale (Endicott et al, 1976) in the 4 weeks preceding the study, (5) Patients with no diagnosis of substance use disorder - current or in the preceding 1 year as defined by DSM 5 criteria, (6) Patients suitable to undergo MRI scan, as per the safety screening questionnaire (having no metal in the body, not being pregnant or suffering from tinnitus).
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Aged between 18 and 50 years.
* In a stable phase of the illness (no change in Global Functioning \> 10 units within 1 month before the MEG scan assessed using the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale).
* Healthy volunteers aged between 18 and 50 years.
* Matched to patients for age (within 2 years), sex, and parental occupational status (rated by NS-SEC).
Exclusion Criteria
* History of head trauma, major neurological disorders (e.g., epilepsy), somatic disorders with neurological complaints (e.g., multiple sclerosis), or intellectual disabilities.
* Diagnosis of substance use disorder (current or within the last year) as per DSM-5.
* Unsuitable for MRI due to safety concerns (e.g., metal in the body, pregnancy, tinnitus).
2. Healthy Controls
* Inability to speak English or French.
* History of head trauma, major neurological disorders (e.g., epilepsy), somatic disorders with neurological complaints (e.g., multiple sclerosis), or intellectual disabilities.
* Diagnosis of substance use disorder (current or within the last year) as per DSM-5.
* Personal or family history of psychotic disorder.
* Unsuitable for MRI due to safety concerns (e.g., metal in the body, pregnancy, tinnitus).
18 Years
50 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Douglas Mental Health University Institute
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Lena Palaniyappan
Director of Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Lena Palaniyappan, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Douglas Mental Health University Institute
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Douglas Mental Health University Institute
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2024-925
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.