Effect of Intraperitoneal Drain Placement on Postoperative Outcomes Following Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Adult Patients With Perforated Appendicitis

NCT ID: NCT06927765

Last Updated: 2025-04-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

500 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-06-01

Study Completion Date

2025-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Acute appendicitis is the most common acute abdomen, and a small number of patients can progress to perforated appendicitis, which has significantly higher complications than non-perforated appendicitis. Appendectomy is the only option for treating perforated appendicitis. Optimizing the diagnosis and treatment of perforated appendicitis is of great significance to improve its clinical outcomes and save medical resources.

There is a consensus that drainage should not be placed after surgery for non-perforated appendicitis, but the decision to place drainage for perforated appendicitis remains controversial. Several retrospective studies have shown no benefit in postoperative recovery and hospital stay, and may lead to increased infectious complications and longer hospital stays. A small number of prospective studies have shown similar conclusions, but the sample size is too small, most of them are children, and there is a lack of large-scale multicenter studies. The investigators' preliminary retrospective survey suggests that in China, most surgeons still commonly place drains for peace of mind after surgery with perforated appendicitis in adults without seeing a clear benefit, so there is a need for a multicenter prospective randomized controlled study to evaluate the need for drainage placement after perforated appendicitis and to guide clinical practice with evidence.

To study the effect of abdominal drainage on the postoperative clinical outcomes of adult patients with perforated appendicitis, mainly including: infectious complications (residual infection or abscess in the abdominal cavity, incision infection, fecal fistula, etc.), case fatality rate, pain score, length of hospital stay (LOS), quality of life (QOL) score, etc.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Perforated Appendicitis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Place an abdominal drain

Place an abdominal drain

No abdominal drain is placed

Intervention Type OTHER

No abdominal drain is placed

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

No abdominal drain is placed

No abdominal drain is placed

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age: ≥ 18 years old (no upper limit);
* Perforated appendicitis or suspected perforated appendicitis who intends to undergo laparoscopic appendectomy;
* Patients and their families (or legal representatives) are able to understand the study protocol and voluntarily participate in this study, and sign informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* Whole abdominal pus was found during the operation;
* Open or laparoscopic conversion to open appendectomy;
* Appendiceal tumors (including postoperative pathology)
* Pregnancy or perinatal period;
* AIDS, tuberculosis, liver cirrhosis, uremia, aplastic anemia, essential thrombocytopenia, inflammatory bowel disease, organ transplantation;
* Long-term or preoperative use of immunosuppressants/glucocorticoids/tumor chemotherapy drugs/targeted drugs/immunodrugs;
* Malignant tumors (including leukemia and lymphoma) disease status, recurrence/metastasis, and perioperative period;
* Drunk, drug abuse/drug addicts;
* Organ dysfunction/failure;
* Those who are transferred to the ICU for various reasons;
* Other conditions that the investigator considers unsuitable for inclusion (e.g., hyperthyroidism, bone marrow dysproliferative syndrome, acute myocardial infarction, acute cerebral infarction, diabetic ketoacidosis, etc.).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University

Qingdao, Shandong, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

LADPA

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.