Appendectomy by Low Impact Laparoscopy vs Routine Laparoscopy : a Randomized Prospective Monocentric Trial
NCT ID: NCT04614519
Last Updated: 2023-11-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-01-12
2022-07-22
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This technique, currently underdeveloped has never been evaluated in the literature for appendectomy.
Main objective of the study: to obtain a reduction in postoperative pain when using the low-impact laparoscopy technique for appendectomies.
Secondary objectives: to study the feasibility of LIL in appendectomies, to obtain a reduction in the average length of stay, a reduction in the consumption of analgesics, a reduction in costs, and a more rapid resumption of activities.
Material and methods :
This is a prospective, single-center, double-blind study. The inclusion criterion is the presence of acute uncomplicated appendicitis. The number of subjects to be included in each group is evaluated at 25. The subjects are divided into two groups preoperatively:
* Conventional group: insufflation pressure at 12mmHg and conventional instrumentation
* LIL group: insufflation pressure at 7mmHg and micro-laparoscopy instrumentation.
Identical dressings are put in place at the end of the procedure in order to hide from the patient the protocol in which he was included.
Pain assessment is recorded daily during the first postoperative week. The consumption of analgesics is also recorded. Then on the 7th day, 15th day and 30th postoperative day. During hospitalization, readings are taken by the nurse. At home, the data is entered by the patient via the Link4Life smartphone application.
Conclusion: LIL applied to appendectomy has never been evaluated in the literature. It would allow a reduction in postoperative pain, the average length of stay for patients as well as improved rehabilitation.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Single Incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy in the Community Utilizing Conventional Instruments
NCT00925145
Preserving or Resecting the Normal Appendix in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopy Surgery for Suspected Appendicitis
NCT06917612
A Trial on Laparoscopic Appendectomy Versus Single Port Appendectomy
NCT01348464
Safety and Efficacy Study of Single Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Acute Appendicitis
NCT01007318
Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy Prospective Randomized Control Study
NCT05611489
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Conventional group
Insufflation pressure at 12mmHg and conventional instrumentation
Conventional group
Insufflation pressure at 12mmHg and conventional instrumentation
Low impact laparoscopy group
Insufflation pressure at 7mmHg and micro-laparoscopy instrumentation
Low impact laparoscopy group
Insufflation pressure at 7mmHg and micro-laparoscopy instrumentation
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Conventional group
Insufflation pressure at 12mmHg and conventional instrumentation
Low impact laparoscopy group
Insufflation pressure at 7mmHg and micro-laparoscopy instrumentation
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* arguments for a complicated appendicitis: fever\> 38.5 ° C, hyperleucytosis\> 15,000, CRP\> 100, presence of an intraperitoneal abscess, a plastron, a fluid effusion of medium or great abundance or '' a pneumoperitoneum on the CT scan
* History of abdominal surgery by laparotomy
* Obese patients (BMI\> 30kg / m2)
* minor patients
* patients without health insurance
* pregnant patient
* patient incarcerated or in detention
* patient under guardianship or curatorship
* rapid sequence induction with the use of ketamine
18 Years
99 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CHU de Nice
Nice, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Etienne JH, Salucki B, Gridel V, Orban JC, Baque P, Massalou D. Low-Impact Laparoscopy vs Conventional Laparoscopy for Appendectomy: A Prospective Randomized Trial. J Am Coll Surg. 2023 Oct 1;237(4):622-631. doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000000795. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
20-AOI-02
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.