Leave or Laparoscopic Appendectomy With Normal Findings - a Regional Cohort Study

NCT ID: NCT06000020

Last Updated: 2023-08-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

1400 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-03-17

Study Completion Date

2026-04-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Based on a regional cohort, this study we will try to demonstrate the superiority of routine laparoscopic appendectomy vs. leaving an intraoperative assessed normal appendix in situ in cases of normal findings at diagnostic laparoscopy. If routine laparoscopic appendectomy is not superior, we will recommend leaving the "normal" appendix in situ.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The study is a retrospective cohort study with a superiority design. It will be carried out at the surgical departments of the four public university hospitals providing emergency surgical service to the entire population of 1,8 million in the Capital Region of Denmark.

On March 17, 2017, a new electronic health record (EHR) had been implemented at three of the hospital, while it was implemented at Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg on May 20, 2017. These dates mark the start of the inclusion period for each hospital, while the inclusion period ended April 1, 2021 for all four hospitals.

The "snap boards" covering the relevant operation rooms at the four hospitals will be systematically review. For all cases, where diagnostic laparoscopy was performed on suspicion of acute appendicitis, the EHR will be reviewed.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Appendicitis Acute

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Diagnostic laparoscopy

Diagnostic laparoscopy on suspicion of acute appendicitis with normal intraoperative findings (including mesenteric adenitis).

No interventions assigned to this group

Laparoscopic appendectomy

Laparoscopic appendectomy despite normal intraoperative findings (including mesenteric adenitis) and histopathology showing a normal appendix.

Laparoscopic appendectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Laparoscopic appendectomy as performed as standard world wide. Division of the appendix with laparoscopic stapler.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Laparoscopic appendectomy

Laparoscopic appendectomy as performed as standard world wide. Division of the appendix with laparoscopic stapler.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Diagnostic laparoscopy with normal intraoperative findings (including mesenteric adenitis
* Laparoscopic appendectomy and a histopathological normal appendix and otherwise normal intraoperative findings (including mesenteric adenitis)

Exclusion Criteria

* Diagnostic laparoscopy with abnormal intraoperative findings.
* Laparoscopic appendectomy and a histopathological non-normal appendix.
* Laparoscopic appendectomy and a histopathological normal appendix and abnormal intraoperative findings.
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Nordsjaellands Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Claus A Bertelsen, Ph.D.

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

[email protected]

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg

Copenhagen NV, , Denmark

Site Status

Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev

Herlev, , Denmark

Site Status

Copenhagen University Hospital - North Zealand

Hillerød, , Denmark

Site Status

Copenhagen University Hospital - Hvidovre

Hvidovre, , Denmark

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Jaunoo SS, Hale AL, Masters JP, Jaunoo SR. An international survey of opinion regarding investigation of possible appendicitis and laparoscopic management of a macroscopically normal appendix. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2012 Oct;94(7):476-80. doi: 10.1308/003588412X13373405385377.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23031764 (View on PubMed)

Di Saverio S, Birindelli A, Kelly MD, Catena F, Weber DG, Sartelli M, Sugrue M, De Moya M, Gomes CA, Bhangu A, Agresta F, Moore EE, Soreide K, Griffiths E, De Castro S, Kashuk J, Kluger Y, Leppaniemi A, Ansaloni L, Andersson M, Coccolini F, Coimbra R, Gurusamy KS, Campanile FC, Biffl W, Chiara O, Moore F, Peitzman AB, Fraga GP, Costa D, Maier RV, Rizoli S, Balogh ZJ, Bendinelli C, Cirocchi R, Tonini V, Piccinini A, Tugnoli G, Jovine E, Persiani R, Biondi A, Scalea T, Stahel P, Ivatury R, Velmahos G, Andersson R. WSES Jerusalem guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis. World J Emerg Surg. 2016 Jul 18;11:34. doi: 10.1186/s13017-016-0090-5. eCollection 2016.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27437029 (View on PubMed)

Bakker OJ, Go PM, Puylaert JB, Kazemier G, Heij HA; Werkgroep richtlijn Diagnostiek en behandeling van acute appendicitis. [Guideline on diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: imaging prior to appendectomy is recommended]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2010;154:A303. Dutch.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21262032 (View on PubMed)

Lee M, Paavana T, Mazari F, Wilson TR. The morbidity of negative appendicectomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2014 Oct;96(7):517-20. doi: 10.1308/003588414X13946184903801.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25245730 (View on PubMed)

Bijnen CL, Van Den Broek WT, Bijnen AB, De Ruiter P, Gouma DJ. Implications of removing a normal appendix. Dig Surg. 2003;20(2):115-21. doi: 10.1159/000069386.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12686778 (View on PubMed)

Gough IR, Morris MI, Pertnikovs EI, Murray MR, Smith MB, Bestmann MS. Consequences of removal of a "normal" appendix. Med J Aust. 1983 Apr 16;1(8):370-2. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1983.tb99414.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 6835144 (View on PubMed)

Sorensen AK, Bang-Nielsen A, Levic-Souzani K, Pommergaard HC, Jorgensen AB, Tolstrup MB, Rud B, Kovacevic B, Bulut O. Readmission and reoperation rates following negative diagnostic laparoscopy for clinically suspected appendicitis: The "normal" appendix should not be removed - A retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg. 2019 Apr;64:1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.02.001. Epub 2019 Feb 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30769215 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

LapApp

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Off-site Training in Laparoscopy
NCT02243215 COMPLETED NA