Early Versus Interval Appendectomy for Ruptured Appendicitis in Children

NCT ID: NCT00435032

Last Updated: 2010-01-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

128 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this randomized trial is to compare two commonly utilized surgical treatments for children with ruptured appendicitis: early appendectomy, versus interval appendectomy. The primary outcome measure is time away from normal activities.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

There are two surgical treatment options for children with ruptured appendicitis. Early appendectomy is one option and typically involves removing the ruptured appendix after several hours of optimizing the patient medically with intravenous fluids and intravenous antibiotics. Another option, interval appendectomy, uses the same initial fluid and antibiotic management, but delays removing the appendix until 6-8 weeks later. The rationale for delaying the appendectomy is to perform the operation at a time when the patient is perhaps more stable and the abdominal cavity is free from contamination. Both of these treatment options are currently used by many pediatric surgeons across the United States and both appear to work well. The two treatment have never been compared in any prospective study. The primary outcome of the study is the time that a patient (and family) is away from normal activities, due to the disease and its treatment. Secondary outcome measures include complication rates, quality of life measures (SF10), hospital cost analysis, and others.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Ruptured Appendicitis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

Early appendectomy

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

early appendectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Appendectomy within 24 hours of admission

2

Interval appendectomy

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

interval appendectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Initial antibiotic treatment followed by appendectomy at 6-8 weeks

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

early appendectomy

Appendectomy within 24 hours of admission

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

interval appendectomy

Initial antibiotic treatment followed by appendectomy at 6-8 weeks

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Clinical diagnosis of ruptured appendicitis

Exclusion Criteria

* Inability to have usual follow up care (e.g. transient to area)
Maximum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Tennessee

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

University of Tennessee

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Martin L Blakely, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Tennessee Health Science Center, LeBonheur Children's Medical Center

Barbara Culbreath, RN

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University of Tennessee Health Science Center, LeBonheur Children's Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

LeBonheur Children's Medical Center

Memphis, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Blakely ML, Williams R, Dassinger MS, Eubanks JW 3rd, Fischer P, Huang EY, Paton E, Culbreath B, Hester A, Streck C, Hixson SD, Langham MR Jr. Early vs interval appendectomy for children with perforated appendicitis. Arch Surg. 2011 Jun;146(6):660-5. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2011.6. Epub 2011 Feb 21.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 21339413 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

R073223335

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Is Interval Appendectomy Necessary?
NCT01853683 TERMINATED NA
Damage Control Laparotomy
NCT02706041 COMPLETED NA