Laparoscopic Reduction of Intussusception in Children: Role in Primary Reduction After Failed Non-Surgical Therapies

NCT ID: NCT06748326

Last Updated: 2025-02-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-05-03

Study Completion Date

2026-03-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Laparoscopic Reduction of Intussusception in Children: Role in Primary Reduction after Failed Non-Surgical Therapies.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Intussusception is one of the main abdominal emergencies in children. Its diagnosis is usually based on the clinical features and confirmed either by U/S and /or barium enema and CT scan in rare occasion. Since the introduction of the hydrostatic reduction of intussusceptions by Ravitch in 1848, it became the gold standard management. However surgical intervention is required if this and other non-operative approaches fail. This typically involves 10 to 20% of cases. Early on, the approach has been through an open laparotomy and manual reduction of intussusception. Later, the introduction of the laparoscopy in the paediatric surgical field has added another dimension to the management of intussusception. In addition to its confirmed general benefits of less pain, better cosmoses, and low long-term risk of adhesive bowel obstruction, it also can be a diagnostic modality in certain cases, primary reduce the intussusception and in some cases to resect the pathological lead point or the damaged segment of bowel. The laparoscope allowed the surgeons to avoid unnecessary open procedures in cases of spontaneous reduction following enema reductions, obviating the need for an open procedure in up to 30% of cases. Despite of all mentioned above, its effectiveness has been questioned.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Intussusception

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Children with intussusception that failed non surgical procedures and whose with recurrence
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Laparoscopic reduction of intussusception in children

The abdomen is insufflated through an umbilical ring incision and a trocar is inserted to act as a camera Port. Two other ports for manipulation are placed depend on the position of the intussusception either in the right lower quadrant and the left upper quadrant or both the upper left and lower left quadrants of the abdomen. These ports position is assuming that radiological reduction has carried the intussusceptum to the right colon. Two atraumatic bowel clamps are used for bowel manipulation. The reduction is achieved by traction placed on the proximal bowel (intussusceptum) out of the distal segment (the intussuscepien).

Group Type OTHER

Laparoscopy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Intussusception reduction by laparoscopy in children in failed non surgical procedures and in recurrence

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Laparoscopy

Intussusception reduction by laparoscopy in children in failed non surgical procedures and in recurrence

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 1\. childs aged 1 year to 12 years with intussusception who failed the hydrostatic reduction.

Exclusion Criteria

\- 1. Childs with Bad general conditions ( coagulopathy, haemodynamic instability, and severe cardiopulmonary diseases).

2\. Known primary disease e.g. lymphoma and major congenital anomalies. 3. Previous abdominal surgeries.
Minimum Eligible Age

1 Year

Maximum Eligible Age

12 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Assiut University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mahmoud Abdelrahman Ahmed Khalil

Resident doctor at surgical department at Assiut university

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Laparoscopy in Intussusception

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Is Interval Appendectomy Necessary?
NCT01853683 TERMINATED NA