Laparoscopic Assisted or Total Laparoscopic Appendectomy
NCT ID: NCT02673528
Last Updated: 2016-02-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
451 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2015-01-31
2016-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Following laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) proved to be a feasible and at least as safe as the corresponding open procedure, it has rapidly gained worldwide acceptance. The traditional approach to LA uses three ports. Over the past decade, successful attempts to perform the procedure with fewer ports have been reported.
The authors' primary objectives were to 1) identify a simple, safe and feasible way to perform laparoscopic appendectomy in patients with uncomplicated acute appendicitis. 2) determine the health related quality of life of the patients and calculate the cost per quality adjusted life years (QALYs) gained after the procedures (LAA and TLA). 3) Purpose a surgical algorithm when approaching to acute appendicitis with the consideration of quality of health and cost.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Which Trocar Access Site Should We Use in Laparoscopic Appendectomy?
NCT05311995
Open to Laparoscopic Reverse Conversion of Perforated Appendicitis
NCT05283733
Transumbilical Laparoscopic Appendectomy
NCT06177418
Preserving or Resecting the Normal Appendix in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopy Surgery for Suspected Appendicitis
NCT06917612
Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy
NCT04618666
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
At the beginning, LA remained questionable whether the benefits of the procedure outweigh over its disadvantages. However, since laparoscopic technology advances and surgeons' expertise increases, many surgeons have successfully performed a multitude of laparoscopic procedures for AA, with a continued increasing trend in its use. Eventually, after LA proved to be a feasible and at least as safe as the corresponding open procedure, it has rapidly gained worldwide acceptance.
There are more techniques for LA in the literature but only a few of them have gained to access and described in modern textbooks. The traditional approach to LA uses three ports. Over the past decade, successful attempts to perform the procedure with fewer ports have been reported which include two-port techniques, single-port techniques, and hybrid approaches. The two-port appendectomy technique consist of one port providing access for a rigid telescope with a working channel, and second port for a grasping forceps that is used to retract the appendix. In the single-port assisted technique, after a stitch is placed between the appendix and the anterior abdominal wall to pull the appendix and create a tension to facilitate dissection, and then appendectomy is performed intracorporeally. The hybrid technique formed from the combination of both open and laparoscopic approaches. Namely the appendix is pulled out through the only or one of the port, and a traditional open appendectomy is then performed extracorporeally.
The authors' primary objectives were to 1) identify a simple, safe and feasible way to perform laparoscopic appendectomy in patients with uncomplicated acute appendicitis. 2) determine the health related quality of life of the patients using Euro Qol (EQ) - 5 Dimensions (5D) - 3 Levels (3L) (EQ-5D-3L) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and calculate the cost per quality adjusted life years (QALYs) gained after the procedures (LAA and TLA). 3) Purpose a surgical algorithm when approaching to acute appendicitis with the consideration of quality of health and cost. For these purposes, a case-control study was designed in January 2015 to investigate these issues.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Directly underwent TLA
Patients with the diagnosis who underwent directly total laparoscopic appendectomy
Laparoscopic appendectomy
Two types of laparoscopic surgery were performed. Total laparoscopic appendectomy or laparoscopic assisted appendectomy
Lap Assisted App
Patients with the diagnosis of acute appendicitis who underwent a successful laparoscopic assisted appendectomy
Laparoscopic appendectomy
Two types of laparoscopic surgery were performed. Total laparoscopic appendectomy or laparoscopic assisted appendectomy
Advanced to TLA
Patients with the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in whom laparoscopic assisted appendectomy attempted; however, because it fail advanced to total laparoscopic appendectomy.
Laparoscopic appendectomy
Two types of laparoscopic surgery were performed. Total laparoscopic appendectomy or laparoscopic assisted appendectomy
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Laparoscopic appendectomy
Two types of laparoscopic surgery were performed. Total laparoscopic appendectomy or laparoscopic assisted appendectomy
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
16 Years
99 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Bahçeşehir University
OTHER
Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University
OTHER
Medical Park Gaziantep Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mehmet Kaplan
Head of General Surgery
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mehmet Kaplan, M.D.
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Bahçeşehir Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MK-007-LAA
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.