Evaluation the Role of Laparoscopic Management of Perforated Appendicitis

NCT ID: NCT03267082

Last Updated: 2017-08-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-09-15

Study Completion Date

2019-03-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) was first reported by Semm in 1983. Since then, its advantages, such as the aesthetic appearance of the wound, less postoperative pain, and faster recovery which facilitates early discharge, have been highlighted, and the number of procedures performed has been continuously increasing.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The LA was performed mostly on uncomplicated appendicitis due to negative opinions about its safety when it was first introduced. However, the application of the procedure has been extended to complicated appendicitis (CA), and it is now considered as an alternative procedure to an open appendectomy (OA) as its safety record has improved . Nevertheless, it is still controversial because there are still concerns about surgical difficulties in managing CA with laparoscopy, overall surgery time, possible post-op complications and conversion to an OA during the surgery.

this study aimed to evaluate the safety and the efficacy of LA for managing perforated appendicitis.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Perforated Appendicitis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Evaluation the role of Laparoscopic management of perforated a

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Laparoscopic management of perforated appendicitis

Intervention Type OTHER

1. Insertion of Ports
2. Exposure of the Appendix
3. peritoneal toilet and aspiration of pus after abdominal exposure
4. Isolation of Mesoappendicular Artery
5. Clipping and Dividing of the Artery
6. Application of 3 x Endoloops
7. Division of the Appendix
8. Retrieval of the Appendix in an Endobag

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Laparoscopic management of perforated appendicitis

1. Insertion of Ports
2. Exposure of the Appendix
3. peritoneal toilet and aspiration of pus after abdominal exposure
4. Isolation of Mesoappendicular Artery
5. Clipping and Dividing of the Artery
6. Application of 3 x Endoloops
7. Division of the Appendix
8. Retrieval of the Appendix in an Endobag

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Clinical diagnosis of acute perforated appendicitis
* fit for laparoscopy and general anesthesia.
* written informed consent.
* short term outcome data and agree to provide contact information.

Exclusion Criteria

* high risk for general anesthesia.
* Appendicular abscess and appendicular mass .
* ongoing infections including chest infections .
* Children and pregnant females .
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Assiut University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

samir hosny mahmoud mohamed

general surgery

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Semm K. Endoscopic appendectomy. Endoscopy. 1983 Mar;15(2):59-64. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1021466.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 6221925 (View on PubMed)

Frazee RC, Bohannon WT. Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. Arch Surg. 1996 May;131(5):509-11; discussion 511-3. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1996.01430170055010.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 8624197 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ERLMPA

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.