Equivalence Study Comparing a Cost-Effective PC-Based Ultrasound Training Tool to Traditional Simulators in Third-Year Medical Students

NCT ID: NCT06775899

Last Updated: 2025-01-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

408 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-03-04

Study Completion Date

2024-04-26

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Brief Summary:

The goal of this clinical trial is to determine if a cost-effective, PC-based ultrasound training tool is as effective as a traditional, medium-cost ultrasound simulator for teaching third-year medical students thoracic and abdominal ultrasound skills. This study focuses on improving access to high-quality ultrasound training in educational settings with limited resources. The main questions it aims to answer are:

1. Does the PC-based tool help participants improve their ability to optimize ultrasound images in a way comparable to the traditional simulator?
2. Can participants using the PC-based tool identify and interpret pathological conditions with the same accuracy as those using the traditional simulator?

Participants are third-year medical students enrolled in a structured internship. They will:

1. Watch educational videos covering key concepts in thoracic and abdominal ultrasound imaging.
2. Rotate through training stations where they will practice using either the PC-based tool or the traditional simulator.
3. Perform hands-on exercises with healthy volunteers to practice image acquisition and recognition of anatomical structures.
4. Complete pre- and post-training assessments to measure their progress in skills such as image optimization and identifying pathological conditions.

This study aims to explore whether a low-cost digital solution can provide equal educational value, offering a practical alternative to traditional simulators in resource-limited settings.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Ultrasound Medical Training Simulation Based Learning Medical Student

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Simulator Thoracic and Abdominal

Participants in this group will receive ultrasound training using a traditional, medium-cost ultrasound simulator (VausSim). This simulator allows students to practice image acquisition and pathology recognition in a controlled environment. Training will also include hands-on practice with healthy volunteers. The performance of students in this group will be compared to those using the PC-based tool to determine if both methods produce similar learning outcomes.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Traditional Ultrasound Simulator (VausSim)

Intervention Type DEVICE

A medium-cost ultrasound simulator used for hands-on training in thoracic and abdominal ultrasound. It allows medical students to practice probe handling, image acquisition, and pathology recognition in a controlled simulation environment.

PC-based tool

Participants in this group will receive ultrasound training using an interactive PC-based tool. This tool provides real ultrasound images and videos to simulate pathology recognition and image optimization. Students will rotate through different training stations, including hands-on practice with healthy volunteers. The goal is to assess whether this low-cost digital tool is as effective as a traditional ultrasound simulator for teaching ultrasound skills.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

PC-Based Ultrasound Training Tool

Intervention Type DEVICE

An interactive, PowerPoint-based PC tool designed to simulate pathology recognition and ultrasound image optimization for medical students. It provides real ultrasound videos and images, allowing students to practice diagnostic interpretation and image acquisition in a structured training format.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

PC-Based Ultrasound Training Tool

An interactive, PowerPoint-based PC tool designed to simulate pathology recognition and ultrasound image optimization for medical students. It provides real ultrasound videos and images, allowing students to practice diagnostic interpretation and image acquisition in a structured training format.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Traditional Ultrasound Simulator (VausSim)

A medium-cost ultrasound simulator used for hands-on training in thoracic and abdominal ultrasound. It allows medical students to practice probe handling, image acquisition, and pathology recognition in a controlled simulation environment.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Third-year medical students enrolled in the "Approach to Ultrasound" internship.
* Participants who have completed the preliminary blended learning videos on thoracic and abdominal ultrasound techniques.
* Participants with or without prior minimal experience in using an ultrasound probe, provided they have not undergone formal specialized ultrasound training.

Exclusion Criteria

* Inability to attend all training sessions and assessments as per the study schedule.
* Physical or medical conditions that limit the ability to perform hands-on ultrasound practice (e.g., musculoskeletal injuries).
* Refusal to provide informed consent.
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Turin, Italy

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Samuel Agostino

PhD, Research Technician

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

SimTo Advanced Medical Simulation Centre

Turin, Italy, Piedmont, Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kollmann C, Flor M, Bader R. A web-based modern ultrasound diagnostic scanner simulation (SimulUS) for undergraduate medical e-learning education. Med Ultrason. 2016 Sep;18(3):408-9. doi: 10.11152/mu.2013.2066.183.kol. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27622424 (View on PubMed)

Weimer J, Recker F, Hasenburg A, Buggenhagen H, Karbach K, Beer L, Weimer A, Schiestl L, Lorenz L, Kloeckner R, Dionysopoulou A. Development and evaluation of a "simulator-based" ultrasound training program for university teaching in obstetrics and gynecology-the prospective GynSim study. Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Apr 24;11:1371141. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1371141. eCollection 2024.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 38721350 (View on PubMed)

Pezel T, Dreyfus J, Mouhat B, Thebaut C, Audureau E, Bernard A, Badie YL, Bohbot Y, Fard D, Nguyen LS, Monteil C, Biere L, Le Ven F, Canu M, Ribeyrolles S, Mion B, Bazire B, Fauvel C, Cautela J, Cambet T, Le Tourneau T, Donal E, Lafitte S, Magne J, Mansencal N, Coisne A; SIMULATOR investigators. Effectiveness of Simulation-Based Training on Transesophageal Echocardiography Learning: The SIMULATOR Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2023 Mar 1;8(3):248-256. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2022.5016.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37070491 (View on PubMed)

Damewood S, Jeanmonod D, Cadigan B. Comparison of a multimedia simulator to a human model for teaching FAST exam image interpretation and image acquisition. Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Apr;18(4):413-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01037.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21496145 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

https://www.dsm.unito.it/do/home.pl/View?doc=/didattica/Centro_di_simulazione_medica_avanzata.html

Official page of the Advanced Medical Simulation Center at the University of Turin, providing resources and information about simulation-based medical education

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

219864

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Use of Simucase for Clinical Learning in Malaysia
NCT06777550 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA