Low VS High-fidelity Interprofessional Simulation for ABG Skills Acquisition

NCT ID: NCT06493188

Last Updated: 2025-12-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

36 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2026-03-01

Study Completion Date

2026-05-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This randomized clinical trial will evaluate the effectiveness of an interprofessional simulation intervention for medical and nursing students.

The primary aim is to compare the effectiveness of high-fidelity versus low-fidelity interprofessional simulation in improving knowledge and skills related to the ABG test. The hypothesis is that participants in the high-fidelity interprofessional simulation group will develop better knowledge and skills for ABG testing compared to those in the low-fidelity group.

The secondary aims are to evaluate the effectiveness of high-fidelity interprofessional simulation compared to low-fidelity interprofessional simulation in (i) enhancing self-efficacy and self-confidence in learning, and (ii) improving interprofessional education and satisfaction with the simulation experience. It is hypothesized that participants in the high-fidelity interprofessional simulation group will report higher levels of self-efficacy, self-confidence, interprofessional education, and satisfaction with the learning experience post-intervention compared to those in the low-fidelity interprofessional simulation group.

The key questions it seeks to address are:

1. Does high-fidelity interprofessional simulation help in developing better technical skills for ABG testing?
2. Does high-fidelity interprofessional simulation lead to greater self-efficacy and self-confidence?
3. Does high-fidelity interprofessional simulation lead to greater satisfaction with the experience, readiness for interprofessional simulation, and better perceptions of interprofessional education?

The researchers will compare high-fidelity interprofessional simulation (immersive medical training room with an actor) to low-fidelity interprofessional simulation (a structured clinical case analysis) to assess whether high-fidelity simulation effectively enhances knowledge and skills on arterial blood gas tests, as well as interprofessional collaboration and attitudes.

Participants will:

* Attend brief interactive lessons on the principles, technique, and interpretation of arterial blood gas tests.
* Participate in a series of clinical-based interprofessional simulation scenarios delivered in low- or high-fidelity.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

After randomization, participants will be assigned sequentially into ten groups to form five high-fidelity interprofessional simulation groups and five low-fidelity interprofessional simulation groups. Each group will consist of six students, including three medical students and three nursing students.

Students will be asked to review and sign the informed consent form to confirm their participation in the study.

Participants will be asked to complete the baseline assessment by completing a questionnaire set. They will be subjected to a brief educational video covering the definition and purpose of the ABG test, the diagnostic and clinical rationale for conducting it, and the technique, including patient assessment, required equipment, factors to consider before performing the procedure, questions to ask the patient, identification of the puncture site, sampling steps, and proper disposal of materials. Additionally, a brief interpretation of ABG test results will be provided, focusing on pH values, carbon dioxide levels, and bicarbonate levels to identify the four main diagnoses: respiratory acidosis, metabolic acidosis, respiratory alkalosis, and metabolic alkalosis.

At the end of the video presentation, participants will be informed about which group they have been assigned to.

During the simulation activities, two independent observers will assess the performance of participants.

At the end of the simulation activities, all students from both groups will be taken separately to designated plenary rooms, where a member of the research team will conduct a debriefing session.

At the conclusion of the debriefing session, each participant will be asked to complete a set of questionnaires.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Interprofessional Relations Self Efficacy Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intervention Group - High-fidelity interprofessional simulation

The interprofessional simulation activity will be conducted in the immersive medical training room. ABG will be performed on a arm simulator. The patient will be personified by an actor with a medical background following a script. A maximum of 10 minutes will be given to address each case.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

High-fidelity interprofessional simulation

Intervention Type OTHER

Students will participate in realistic (high-fidelity) interprofessional simulation scenarios to practice and interpret ABG procedures.

Control Group - Low-fidelity interprofessional simulation

This interprofessional simulation activity will be conducted in a room that will be equipped with tables and chairs. The same clinical cases will be provided using printed documents and clinical charts. A time of 10 minutes will be given to address each case.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Low-fidelity interprofessional simulation

Intervention Type OTHER

Students will take part in low-fidelity interprofessional simulation scenarios. Cases will be discussed, and reflection on ABG execution and interpretation will be guided using paper descriptions and clinical files.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

High-fidelity interprofessional simulation

Students will participate in realistic (high-fidelity) interprofessional simulation scenarios to practice and interpret ABG procedures.

Intervention Type OTHER

Low-fidelity interprofessional simulation

Students will take part in low-fidelity interprofessional simulation scenarios. Cases will be discussed, and reflection on ABG execution and interpretation will be guided using paper descriptions and clinical files.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Early-career students (First-year Nursing Bachelor's Degree; second-year Medicine \& Surgery Degree)
* Regularly enrolled in their courses (attended at least 70% of classes)
* Proficient in English (reading and speaking)
* Aged 18 years or older

Exclusion Criteria

* Students who have previously taken classes on arterial blood gas sampling
* Those who have prior work experience as healthcare professionals (e.g., laboratory technicians, phlebotomists)
* Students who have previously experience in interprofessional learning activities
* Students who have previously experience in the simulation center
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Fondazione CRT, Torino

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Turin, Italy

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Torino - Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences

Orbassano, Torino, Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Savino Sciascia, MD; PhD

Role: CONTACT

+39 0112402051

Alessio Conti, RN; PhD

Role: CONTACT

+39 0116705823

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Savino Sciascia, MD;PhD

Role: primary

+390112402051

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

INTSIM_GB_UNITO_01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.