Impact of a Simulation-based Training Curriculum of Non-technical Skills on Colonoscopy Performance
NCT ID: NCT02877420
Last Updated: 2017-05-02
Study Results
Results pending
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
Recruitment Status
COMPLETED
Clinical Phase
NA
Total Enrollment
42 participants
Study Classification
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Start Date
2015-06-30
Study Completion Date
2016-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The investigators aim to test a curriculum of non-technical skills (NTS) training for simulation-based training of colonoscopy. There is no known literature to date on the optimal approach on how to teach NTS in endoscopy. The objectives are to evaluate a simulation-based curriculum to teach NTS, to explore the relationship between NTS and other domains of competency, and understand how NTS are acquired in endoscopic training.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comprehensive Surgical Coaching
NCT01875679
Surgical Technical Skill
Technical Errors in Surgery
COMPLETED
NA
Using Simulation to Ensure Basic Competence in Gastroscopy
NCT04150237
Endoscopy
Simulation
Education
+1 more
COMPLETED
Use of an Observer Tool and Learning of Non-technical Skills
NCT05397756
Simulation
Education
UNKNOWN
NA
Evaluating the Impact of In-Situ Simulation on Interprofessional Healthcare Team Training
NCT07346937
in Situ Simulation
Simulation in Training Center
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
Simulation-based Learning for Neurosurgical Instruments in Perioperative Nurses
NCT03894644
Focus of Study: Simulation Technology
COMPLETED
NA
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This study will employ a randomized controlled two-arm design. All testing and training will take place at St. Michael's Hospital (30 Bond Street, Toronto, Ontario). During the study participants will be performing simulated lower endoscopic procedures on a virtual reality (VR) endoscopy simulator.
Description of Simulation Devices used
Low-Fidelity Simulator (Bench Top Model): The low-fidelity simulator is a validated bench-top endoscopy simulator that helps develop general endoscopic skills. The simulator is comprised of a series of vertical wooden barriers with numbered targets (holes) conforming to 27 different sequences of varying complexity. An Olympus paediatric videocolonoscope is used to navigate the defined sequences as quickly and accurately as possible, with visual output being displayed on a video monitor.
High-Fidelity Simulator: Virtual Reality Model: The high-fidelity simulator to be used for testing and training is the EndoVR® virtual reality (VR) endoscopy simulator. It models navigation through a colon, using a specialized endoscope that is inserted into a computer-based module with a screen showing the colonic lumen of a virtual patient. It provides both visual and haptic feedback related to the procedure. The VR simulator has a number of standardized case-based scenarios of varying complexity for colonoscopy.
Details of experimental design
Baseline questionnaire: A written questionnaire will be administered to all participants at the start of the project to collect demographic and background information including: age, sex, level of training, previous endoscopy experience and nature of experience (if applicable), and video game experience, which may correlate with baseline endoscopic skill.
Pre-test: All participants will then take part in a pre-test designed to assess their baseline (1) knowledge of colonoscopy; (2) technical skills; and (3) non-technical skills. No feedback will be provided at any point during the pre-test. The pre-test will consist of the following:
Knowledge Test: A 30 minute (20 questions) multiple-choice question test designed to assess participants' theoretical knowledge of colonoscopy, including indications, sedation, safety, findings, pathology and follow-up.
VR Simulation Test: Participants baseline endoscopic technical proficiency will be will be assessed through the completion of a colonoscopy procedure on the VR simulator. This scenario simulates a screening colonoscopy, without the need for any type of intervention such as biopsy. The procedure will be timed so that participants do not take longer than 30 minutes to complete the procedure. An expert rater will be present to assess performance, but will not provide assistance. All participants will be videotaped in order to obtain performance measures such that their faces are not captured to ensure anonymity. Prior to starting the procedure, participants will complete a questionnaire to measure their self-efficacy.
VR Simulation Based "Integrated Scenario" Test: Following the simulator-only test, participants will complete an Integrated Scenario format test to assess their baseline endoscopic non-technical proficiency. This test was modeled after another test during which participants perform a colonoscopy procedure on the VR simulator while interacting with an endoscopic nurse and a standardized patient (SP) portraying a patient. The simulated procedure will mimic the setup of an endoscopic suite, as the VR simulator will be positioned next to a patient bed. A standardized patient, who will receive instructions regarding their medical role, will act out a scenario on colon cancer screening. Trainees will be expected to explain the colonoscopy procedure, its benefits and risks, and obtain procedural consent. The trainee will then carry out the procedure on the VR simulator while responding to the patient and interacting with the standardized nurse (SN) as appropriate. The SP will act out cues from the VR simulator if the simulator signals that the procedure has exceeded its threshold for discomfort. The performance of all participants will be videotaped (in a manner that their faces are not captured to ensure anonymity) in order to obtain performance measures. Participants will be given a maximum of 45 minutes to complete the procedure. Prior to starting the procedure, participants will complete a questionnaire to measure their self-efficacy.
Training interventions: Subsequently participants will be randomized, using an online randomization algorithm, to one of two groups (following a 1:1 allocation distribution)
Sample size calculation: A power analysis was computed using G\*Power version 3.1.9. Using a previous study that evaluated an NTS training curriculum in surgery as assessed by the Non-Technical Skills for Surgeons (NOTSS) and OSANTS forms, we conducted the analysis using the relevant effect size. Based on an effect size of 0.65 (effect size f), an alpha of 0.05 (two-tailed), a beta of 0.20, 2 groups, and 3 measurements, 16 participants are required to achieve a power of greater than 0.80 using repeated measures ANOVA (between-factors). Furthermore, a previous study comparing a curriculum in endoscopic simulation found that a minimum of 15 participants per group was sufficient to detect a significant difference. To accommodate for a projected 20% dropout and/or non-response that may occur, we therefore plan to recruit a total of 36 participants.
Statistical analysis: Statistical analyses will be performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20. All statistical tests will be considered significant at p \< 0.05. Baseline Questionnaire: Patient demographics and baseline variables will be compared between the two groups using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and chi-square tests for continuous and categorical variables respectively. (b)Clinical Performance (Technical and Non-Technical): Clinical performance during the live colonoscopies for each group will be determined by comparing the scores from the DOPS, GiECAT, NAPCOMS, and Modified-OSANTS. Specifically, a mixed factor 2 (NTS curriculum vs. TS curriculum) x 2 (procedure 1 vs. procedure 2) ANOVA will be used to determine whether there is a difference based on the rating scales. Tukey's honest significant difference (HSD) test will be used as a post-hoc analysis to determine any significant differences.
Technical Performance: Technical performance on the simulator for each group will be determined by comparing the scores from the DOPS, GiECAT, and GAGES. Specifically, a mixed factor 2 (NTS curriculum vs. TS curriculum) x 3 (pretest, posttest, retention test) ANOVA will be used to determine whether there is a difference based on the rating scales. Tukey HSD test will be used as a post-hoc analysis to determine any significant differences.
Non-Technical Performance: Non-technical performance on the simulator for each group will be determined by comparing the scores from the GiECAT and modified OSANTS. Specifically, a mixed factor 2 (NTS curriculum vs. TS curriculum) x 3 (pretest, posttest, retention test) ANOVA will be used to determine whether there is a difference based on the rating scales. Tukey HSD test will be used as a post-hoc analysis to determine any significant differences.
Description of Simulation Devices used
Low-Fidelity Simulator (Bench Top Model): The low-fidelity simulator is a validated bench-top endoscopy simulator that helps develop general endoscopic skills. The simulator is comprised of a series of vertical wooden barriers with numbered targets (holes) conforming to 27 different sequences of varying complexity. An Olympus paediatric videocolonoscope is used to navigate the defined sequences as quickly and accurately as possible, with visual output being displayed on a video monitor.
High-Fidelity Simulator: Virtual Reality Model: The high-fidelity simulator to be used for testing and training is the EndoVR® virtual reality (VR) endoscopy simulator. It models navigation through a colon, using a specialized endoscope that is inserted into a computer-based module with a screen showing the colonic lumen of a virtual patient. It provides both visual and haptic feedback related to the procedure. The VR simulator has a number of standardized case-based scenarios of varying complexity for colonoscopy.
Details of experimental design
Baseline questionnaire: A written questionnaire will be administered to all participants at the start of the project to collect demographic and background information including: age, sex, level of training, previous endoscopy experience and nature of experience (if applicable), and video game experience, which may correlate with baseline endoscopic skill.
Pre-test: All participants will then take part in a pre-test designed to assess their baseline (1) knowledge of colonoscopy; (2) technical skills; and (3) non-technical skills. No feedback will be provided at any point during the pre-test. The pre-test will consist of the following:
Knowledge Test: A 30 minute (20 questions) multiple-choice question test designed to assess participants' theoretical knowledge of colonoscopy, including indications, sedation, safety, findings, pathology and follow-up.
VR Simulation Test: Participants baseline endoscopic technical proficiency will be will be assessed through the completion of a colonoscopy procedure on the VR simulator. This scenario simulates a screening colonoscopy, without the need for any type of intervention such as biopsy. The procedure will be timed so that participants do not take longer than 30 minutes to complete the procedure. An expert rater will be present to assess performance, but will not provide assistance. All participants will be videotaped in order to obtain performance measures such that their faces are not captured to ensure anonymity. Prior to starting the procedure, participants will complete a questionnaire to measure their self-efficacy.
VR Simulation Based "Integrated Scenario" Test: Following the simulator-only test, participants will complete an Integrated Scenario format test to assess their baseline endoscopic non-technical proficiency. This test was modeled after another test during which participants perform a colonoscopy procedure on the VR simulator while interacting with an endoscopic nurse and a standardized patient (SP) portraying a patient. The simulated procedure will mimic the setup of an endoscopic suite, as the VR simulator will be positioned next to a patient bed. A standardized patient, who will receive instructions regarding their medical role, will act out a scenario on colon cancer screening. Trainees will be expected to explain the colonoscopy procedure, its benefits and risks, and obtain procedural consent. The trainee will then carry out the procedure on the VR simulator while responding to the patient and interacting with the standardized nurse (SN) as appropriate. The SP will act out cues from the VR simulator if the simulator signals that the procedure has exceeded its threshold for discomfort. The performance of all participants will be videotaped (in a manner that their faces are not captured to ensure anonymity) in order to obtain performance measures. Participants will be given a maximum of 45 minutes to complete the procedure. Prior to starting the procedure, participants will complete a questionnaire to measure their self-efficacy.
Training interventions: Subsequently participants will be randomized, using an online randomization algorithm, to one of two groups (following a 1:1 allocation distribution)
Sample size calculation: A power analysis was computed using G\*Power version 3.1.9. Using a previous study that evaluated an NTS training curriculum in surgery as assessed by the Non-Technical Skills for Surgeons (NOTSS) and OSANTS forms, we conducted the analysis using the relevant effect size. Based on an effect size of 0.65 (effect size f), an alpha of 0.05 (two-tailed), a beta of 0.20, 2 groups, and 3 measurements, 16 participants are required to achieve a power of greater than 0.80 using repeated measures ANOVA (between-factors). Furthermore, a previous study comparing a curriculum in endoscopic simulation found that a minimum of 15 participants per group was sufficient to detect a significant difference. To accommodate for a projected 20% dropout and/or non-response that may occur, we therefore plan to recruit a total of 36 participants.
Statistical analysis: Statistical analyses will be performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20. All statistical tests will be considered significant at p \< 0.05. Baseline Questionnaire: Patient demographics and baseline variables will be compared between the two groups using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and chi-square tests for continuous and categorical variables respectively. (b)Clinical Performance (Technical and Non-Technical): Clinical performance during the live colonoscopies for each group will be determined by comparing the scores from the DOPS, GiECAT, NAPCOMS, and Modified-OSANTS. Specifically, a mixed factor 2 (NTS curriculum vs. TS curriculum) x 2 (procedure 1 vs. procedure 2) ANOVA will be used to determine whether there is a difference based on the rating scales. Tukey's honest significant difference (HSD) test will be used as a post-hoc analysis to determine any significant differences.
Technical Performance: Technical performance on the simulator for each group will be determined by comparing the scores from the DOPS, GiECAT, and GAGES. Specifically, a mixed factor 2 (NTS curriculum vs. TS curriculum) x 3 (pretest, posttest, retention test) ANOVA will be used to determine whether there is a difference based on the rating scales. Tukey HSD test will be used as a post-hoc analysis to determine any significant differences.
Non-Technical Performance: Non-technical performance on the simulator for each group will be determined by comparing the scores from the GiECAT and modified OSANTS. Specifically, a mixed factor 2 (NTS curriculum vs. TS curriculum) x 3 (pretest, posttest, retention test) ANOVA will be used to determine whether there is a difference based on the rating scales. Tukey HSD test will be used as a post-hoc analysis to determine any significant differences.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Endoscopy Simulation
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
Allocation Method
RANDOMIZED
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Primary Study Purpose
OTHER
Blinding Strategy
DOUBLE
Investigators
Outcome Assessors
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Non-Technical Skills Training Curriculum
This group will receive 4 hours of small-group and hands-on sessions and 1 hour of didactic NTS sessions. Participants will watch a video that demonstrates ideal endoscopic performance. They will use the E-NTS Checklist during the integrated scenario training. This checklist targets NTS. The group will be given 7 hours of expert-assisted instruction on the low-fidelity simulator (1 hour) and the high-fidelity VR simulator (6 hours). Six modules of increasing difficulty in colonoscopy and polypectomy will be taught with feedback from an expert endoscopist who will demonstrate techniques, answer questions and provide individualized performance feedback with a focus on NTS. The last three hours on the high fidelity simulator will be an integrated scenario (IG) featuring standardized patient (SP) and standardized nurse (SN). Feedback will be given after each IG by the instructor, SP and SN. Participants can view the E-NTS Checklist before and after each case.
Group Type
EXPERIMENTAL
Non-Technical Skills Training Curriculum
Intervention Type
OTHER
Conventional Simulation Training Group
This group will receive 4 hours of small-group and hands-on sessions on colonoscopy theory from an expert endoscopist. The core curriculum is designed on the basis of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy colonoscopy curriculum and an endoscopic training textbook. This curriculum has been shown to be effective when compared to self-regulated learning on the simulator. The sessions will be interlaced with eight hours of expert-assisted instruction on both the low-fidelity simulator (1 hour) and on the high-fidelity VR simulator (7 hours). Six modules of increasing difficulty in colonoscopy and polypectomy will be taught with feedback from an expert endoscopist. The expert will demonstrate techniques, answer questions and provide feedback on global performance. Feedback, in the form of performance metrics, will be provided by the simulator upon completion/failure of each module.
Group Type
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
Conventional Simulation Training Group
Intervention Type
OTHER
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Non-Technical Skills Training Curriculum
Intervention Type
OTHER
Conventional Simulation Training Group
Intervention Type
OTHER
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Novice endoscopists from general surgery, gastroenterology, or pediatrics gastroenterology residency programs at the University of Toronto
Exclusion Criteria
* If participants have performed more than 25 endoscopies
Eligible Sex
ALL
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Unity Health Toronto
OTHER
Sponsor Role
lead
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Samir Grover
MD, MEd, FRCPC
Responsibility Role
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Samir C Grover, MD, MEd
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Unity Health Toronto
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
St.Michael's Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Site Status
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Canada
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Arriaga AF, Bader AM, Wong JM, Lipsitz SR, Berry WR, Ziewacz JE, Hepner DL, Boorman DJ, Pozner CN, Smink DS, Gawande AA. Simulation-based trial of surgical-crisis checklists. N Engl J Med. 2013 Jan 17;368(3):246-53. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1204720.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977 Mar;84(2):191-215. doi: 10.1037//0033-295x.84.2.191. No abstract available.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Barton JR, Corbett S, van der Vleuten CP; English Bowel Cancer Screening Programme; UK Joint Advisory Group for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. The validity and reliability of a Direct Observation of Procedural Skills assessment tool: assessing colonoscopic skills of senior endoscopists. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Mar;75(3):591-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.09.053. Epub 2012 Jan 9.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Brydges R, Carnahan H, Rose D, Rose L, Dubrowski A. Coordinating progressive levels of simulation fidelity to maximize educational benefit. Acad Med. 2010 May;85(5):806-12. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181d7aabd.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Cook TM, Woodall N, Harper J, Benger J; Fourth National Audit Project. Major complications of airway management in the UK: results of the Fourth National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Difficult Airway Society. Part 2: intensive care and emergency departments. Br J Anaesth. 2011 May;106(5):632-42. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer059. Epub 2011 Mar 29.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Dedy NJ, Bonrath EM, Ahmed N, Grantcharov TP. Structured Training to Improve Nontechnical Performance of Junior Surgical Residents in the Operating Room: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg. 2016 Jan;263(1):43-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001186.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Dedy NJ, Szasz P, Louridas M, Bonrath EM, Husslein H, Grantcharov TP. Objective structured assessment of nontechnical skills: Reliability of a global rating scale for the in-training assessment in the operating room. Surgery. 2015 Jun;157(6):1002-13. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2014.12.023. Epub 2015 Feb 20.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov;41(4):1149-60. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Flin R, Patey R, Glavin R, Maran N. Anaesthetists' non-technical skills. Br J Anaesth. 2010 Jul;105(1):38-44. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq134. Epub 2010 Jun 3.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Flin R, Yule S, Paterson-Brown S, Maran N, Rowley D, Youngson G. Teaching surgeons about non-technical skills. Surgeon. 2007 Apr;5(2):86-9. doi: 10.1016/s1479-666x(07)80059-x.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Gordon M, Darbyshire D, Baker P. Non-technical skills training to enhance patient safety: a systematic review. Med Educ. 2012 Nov;46(11):1042-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04343.x.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Grover SC, Garg A, Scaffidi MA, Yu JJ, Plener IS, Yong E, Cino M, Grantcharov TP, Walsh CM. Impact of a simulation training curriculum on technical and nontechnical skills in colonoscopy: a randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Dec;82(6):1072-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.04.008. Epub 2015 May 23.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Guadagnoli MA, Lee TD. Challenge point: a framework for conceptualizing the effects of various practice conditions in motor learning. J Mot Behav. 2004 Jun;36(2):212-24. doi: 10.3200/JMBR.36.2.212-224.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Guadagnoli M, Morin MP, Dubrowski A. The application of the challenge point framework in medical education. Med Educ. 2012 May;46(5):447-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04210.x.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Hales B, Terblanche M, Fowler R, Sibbald W. Development of medical checklists for improved quality of patient care. Int J Qual Health Care. 2008 Feb;20(1):22-30. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm062. Epub 2007 Dec 11.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Hatala R, Cook DA, Zendejas B, Hamstra SJ, Brydges R. Feedback for simulation-based procedural skills training: a meta-analysis and critical narrative synthesis. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2014 May;19(2):251-72. doi: 10.1007/s10459-013-9462-8. Epub 2013 May 28.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Hoch JS, Rockx MA, Krahn AD. Using the net benefit regression framework to construct cost-effectiveness acceptability curves: an example using data from a trial of external loop recorders versus Holter monitoring for ambulatory monitoring of "community acquired" syncope. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Jun 6;6:68. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-68.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Hull L, Arora S, Aggarwal R, Darzi A, Vincent C, Sevdalis N. The impact of nontechnical skills on technical performance in surgery: a systematic review. J Am Coll Surg. 2012 Feb;214(2):214-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.10.016. Epub 2011 Dec 24.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Kemper PF, van Noord I, de Bruijne M, Knol DL, Wagner C, van Dyck C. Development and reliability of the explicit professional oral communication observation tool to quantify the use of non-technical skills in healthcare. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Jul;22(7):586-95. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001451. Epub 2013 Feb 14.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Kneebone R, Nestel D, Yadollahi F, Brown R, Nolan C, Durack J, Brenton H, Moulton C, Archer J, Darzi A. Assessing procedural skills in context: Exploring the feasibility of an Integrated Procedural Performance Instrument (IPPI). Med Educ. 2006 Nov;40(11):1105-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02612.x.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Mann KV. Theoretical perspectives in medical education: past experience and future possibilities. Med Educ. 2011 Jan;45(1):60-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03757.x.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Matharoo M, Haycock A, Sevdalis N, Thomas-Gibson S. Endoscopic non-technical skills team training: the next step in quality assurance of endoscopy training. World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Dec 14;20(46):17507-15. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i46.17507.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Matharoo M, Sevdalis N, Thillai M, Bouri S, Marjot T, Haycock A, Thomas-Gibson S. The endoscopy safety checklist: A longitudinal study of factors affecting compliance in a tertiary referral centre within the United Kingdom. BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2015 Feb 11;4(1):u206344.w2567. doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u206344.w2567. eCollection 2015.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Mishra A, Catchpole K, McCulloch P. The Oxford NOTECHS System: reliability and validity of a tool for measuring teamwork behaviour in the operating theatre. Qual Saf Health Care. 2009 Apr;18(2):104-8. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2007.024760.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Pena G, Altree M, Field J, Thomas MJ, Hewett P, Babidge W, Maddern GJ. Surgeons' and trainees' perceived self-efficacy in operating theatre non-technical skills. Br J Surg. 2015 May;102(6):708-15. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9787. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Reader T, Flin R, Lauche K, Cuthbertson BH. Non-technical skills in the intensive care unit. Br J Anaesth. 2006 May;96(5):551-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/ael067. Epub 2006 Mar 27.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Rostom A, Ross ED, Dube C, Rutter MD, Lee T, Valori R, Bridges RJ, Pontifex D, Webbink V, Rees C, Brown C, Whetter DH, Kelsey SG, Hilsden RJ. Development and validation of a nurse-assessed patient comfort score for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Feb;77(2):255-61. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.10.003.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Savoldelli GL, Naik VN, Park J, Joo HS, Chow R, Hamstra SJ. Value of debriefing during simulated crisis management: oral versus video-assisted oral feedback. Anesthesiology. 2006 Aug;105(2):279-85. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200608000-00010.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Undre S, Healey AN, Darzi A, Vincent CA. Observational assessment of surgical teamwork: a feasibility study. World J Surg. 2006 Oct;30(10):1774-83. doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-0488-9.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
van Dongen KW, Verleisdonk EJ, Schijven MP, Broeders IA. Will the Playstation generation become better endoscopic surgeons? Surg Endosc. 2011 Jul;25(7):2275-80. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1548-2. Epub 2011 Mar 17.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Walsh CM, Ling SC, Khanna N, Grover SC, Yu JJ, Cooper MA, Yong E, Nguyen GC, May G, Walters TD, Reznick R, Rabeneck L, Carnahan H. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Competency Assessment Tool: reliability and validity evidence. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81(6):1417-1424.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.11.030. Epub 2015 Mar 7.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Walsh CM, Ling SC, Walters TD, Mamula P, Lightdale JR, Carnahan H. Development of the gastrointestinal endoscopy competency assessment tool for pediatric colonoscopy (GiECAT KIDS). J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2014 Oct;59(4):480-6. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000000358.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Walsh CM, Sherlock ME, Ling SC, Carnahan H. Virtual reality simulation training for health professions trainees in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jun 13;(6):CD008237. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008237.pub2.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Yule S, Flin R, Paterson-Brown S, Maran N. Non-technical skills for surgeons in the operating room: a review of the literature. Surgery. 2006 Feb;139(2):140-9. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2005.06.017.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Khan R, Scaffidi MA, Walsh CM, Lin P, Al-Mazroui A, Chana B, Kalaichandran R, Lee W, Grantcharov TP, Grover SC. Simulation-Based Training of Non-Technical Skills in Colonoscopy: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2017 Aug 4;6(8):e153. doi: 10.2196/resprot.7690.
Reference Type
DERIVED
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
15-164c
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.
Effects of Developing a Mobile-based Interactive Simulation Scheme for Assisting the Personalized Hands-on Learning of Nasogastric Tube Insertion
NCT05742659
COMPLETED
NA
Comparing Mixed Reality, Video-Based, and Instructor-Led Training for Nasogastric Tube Insertion in Nursing Students
NCT07293663
RECRUITING
NA
Improving Team Training During Mock Code Blue Simulations
NCT02529215
UNKNOWN
NA
Education Intervention as a Patient Safety Strategy in the Care of Nasoenteric Tube
NCT03497221
UNKNOWN
NA
Proficiency Based Robotics Training Curriculum: Skill Acquisition & Transferability of Skills to Live Porcine Models
NCT02895347
COMPLETED
NA
Effect of Virtual Endoscopy Simulator Training on Real Patient Endoscopy
NCT00576043
COMPLETED
NA
Procedure-Specific Resident Objective Modular Training Evaluation
NCT05887570
COMPLETED
NA
Simulation-based Training of Operating Assistants: Procedure- Versus Camera Navigation Training
NCT02530099
COMPLETED
NA
The Training and Evaluate Effect on Clinical Airway Management for Novices.
NCT03856073
UNKNOWN
NA
Students and Trainers' Evaluations Correlation
NCT03957889
COMPLETED
Learning From Errors During Simulation-based Ultrasound Training
NCT02369640
COMPLETED
NA
Focused Cardiac and Lung Ultrasound in Anesthesia/Critical Care - The Role of Self-directed Simulation-assisted Training Compared to a Traditional Supervised Approach
NCT01972698
UNKNOWN
NA
A Pilot Study on Training Simulator Efficacy
NCT05436899
RECRUITING
NA
Effectiveness of Scenario-Based Online Simulation in Chest Trauma in Nurses
NCT06902870
COMPLETED
NA
Structured Training on Oncology Nurses' Performance Related Port A Cath Device
NCT05774301
COMPLETED
NA
The Training and Evaluate Effect on Clinical Airway Management
NCT03854760
UNKNOWN
NA
The Evaluation of the Ultrasound-guided Clinical Procedure Simulation Curriculum
NCT04792203
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Utilizing Gaze Training to Enhance Laparoscopic Skills Training
NCT03413943
COMPLETED
NA
Evaluation of Surgical Simulator for Practicing a Vascular Anastomosis
NCT00318279
COMPLETED
NA
Three-dimensional Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Model
NCT06114433
RECRUITING
NA
Simulation Training For Invasive Cardiovascular Procedures
NCT06224101
COMPLETED
NA
Evaluation of the Effects of Virtual Reality Learning Environment on Nursing Student Non-technical Skills Development
NCT06277557
COMPLETED
NA
Optimizing Resource Utilization During Proficiency-based Training of Suturing Skills to Medical Students
NCT03650959
COMPLETED
NA
Nurses' Competence in Gastric Ultrasound
NCT06320574
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Transfer of Non-technical Skills From Simulation to Clinical Practice
NCT04922203
UNKNOWN
NA