Use of Simucase for Clinical Learning in Malaysia

NCT ID: NCT06777550

Last Updated: 2025-01-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

24 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-01-19

Study Completion Date

2025-12-25

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this feasibility study is to the investigate the use of Simucase in the context of health science learning in Malaysia. This study can be a catalyst for technology-based clinical learning than just conventional methods to enrich the learning experience. This can influence the policy in promoting the effective use of existing commercial technologies in clinical learning for health science programs in Malaysia and can transform national higher education scenario in the future.

An experimental study with 24 participants from the rehabilitation disciplines of audiology, occupational therapy, physiotherapy, and speech therapy method using a pilot study techniques of clinical control studies. Participants will be assigned to either the experimental group who will receive the clinical learning method using SimucaseTM or (ii) the control group - which will accept conventional clinical learning methods such as problem-based learning case-study case studies. The topic of learning is the same for both groups.

The study hypothesis includes:

* There is a significant difference on clinical skills between SimucaseTM and conventional approach of learning among health science students.
* There is a significant difference on students' satisfaction learning between SimucaseTM and conventional approach of learning among health science students.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

INTRODUCTION

In line with the changing agenda of the international paradigm that promotes the use of technology in the learning of health studies to overcome problems related to placement, logistics, human resources for supervision, patient aversion and creating a safe and conducive learning environment to form good competencies before stepping into clinical field learning. World bodies such as the World Federation Occupational Therapists allow the replacement of 20% of clinical field training to alternative clinical learning such as the use of technology and tele-health.

This study can be a catalyst for technology-based clinical learning than just conventional methods to enrich the learning experience. This can influence the policy in promoting the effective use of existing commercial technologies in clinical learning for health science programs in Malaysia and can transform national higher education scenario in the future.

PROBLEM STATEMENT

Education research in allied health especially rehabilitation, is more marginalized than medicine or nursing. This retards the advancement of teaching and learning strategies to optimize allied health education. Adopting knowledge from other fields such as medicine and nursing may be less fitting with the allied health education's needs. Therefore, it is essential to tailor the available learning strategies carefully to optimize their learning benefits according to the discipline's needs.

The clinical placement was reported to have missed a substantial learning opportunity due to a lack of theoretical application and weak teaching skills among clinicians. Having clinical simulation to supplement clinical placement was beneficial to optimize the gain from clinical learning as it was constructed on a solid learning theory. Simulation has become more advanced with the current availability of technology in combination with gaming elements. The combination of virtual simulation and gaming element creates substantial learning opportunity based on Kolb's experiential learning model.

RESEARCH OBJECTIVES

Main Objective

• To investigate the applicability of SimucaseTM software for clinical learning among health science students.

Specific Objectives

* To investigate the efficacy of SimucaseTM compared to conventional approach for clinical skills.
* To compare students' satisfaction on learning using SimucaseTM over conventional approach in clinical learning among health science students.
* To explore the feasibility of SimucaseTM as an alternative learning method for clinical learning among health science students.

Study design

The experimental study method used pilot study techniques, clinical control studies is proposed. This method is a high-quality technique to ensure the effectiveness of an intervention is credible.

Study samples

Students will be selected from the disciplines of audiology, occupational therapy, physiotherapy, and speech therapy at an institution. It is expected that 24 students (12 per control and experiment group) for each discipline will be recruited. Only second- to fourth-year students will be recruited, as first-year students have not yet taken any specialized courses in the program, making them unprepared for clinical learning.

Procedure

Each discipline will conduct RCT research separately to reduce the bias of differences between fields of study. Here, each RCT research will divide the students into two groups using sample random sampling, namely (i) the experiment group - who will receive the clinical learning method using SimucaseTM; and (ii) the control group - which will accept conventional clinical learning methods such as problem-based learning case-study case studies. The topic of learning is the same for both groups. It is recommended to have a learning session of two sessions for each group within a week. After the end of the study, the study participants will be evaluated for their performance by answering some survey forms (i.e., SLSQ). Only one data collection time is done (i.e., post-test) only. For ethical purpose, the control group and the experiment group will be cross-over (e.g., swap) on the learning approach to experience both approaches but not evaluated.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Clinical Learning

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

SimucaseTM

The experiment group - who will receive the clinical learning method using SimucaseTM

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

SimucaseTM

Intervention Type OTHER

experiment group - who will receive the clinical learning method using SimucaseTM

Conventional clinical learning

The control group - which will accept conventional clinical learning methods such as problem-based learning case-study case studies

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Conventional Clinical Learning

Intervention Type OTHER

Problem-based learning case-study case studies

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

SimucaseTM

experiment group - who will receive the clinical learning method using SimucaseTM

Intervention Type OTHER

Conventional Clinical Learning

Problem-based learning case-study case studies

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Students from rehabilitation-related academic programmes such as occupational therapy, physiotherapy, speech therapy and audiology.
* Students from undergraduate second to fourth year of the academic programme.

Exclusion Criteria

• International students Students who are not willing to participate in this program during the semester break.
Minimum Eligible Age

19 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

25 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universiti Putra Malaysia

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

National University of Malaysia

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Farahiyah Wan Yunus

Principle Investigator and Head of Site Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Farahiyah Wan Yunus, Doctor of Philosophy

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

National University of Malaysia

Muhammad H Romli, Doctor of Philosophy

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Universiti Putra Malaysia

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

National University of Malaysia

Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Malaysia

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Farahiyah Wan Yunus, Doctor of Philosophy

Role: CONTACT

+60122269537

Muhammad H Romli, Doctor of Philosophy

Role: CONTACT

+601112255977

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

World Federation of Occupational Therapists. (2020). COVID-19 and WFOT minimum education standards statement, 2020. Available: https://www.wfot.org/news/2020/covid-19-and-wfot-minimum-education-standards-statement

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Waseh S, Dicker AP. Telemedicine Training in Undergraduate Medical Education: Mixed-Methods Review. JMIR Med Educ. 2019 Apr 8;5(1):e12515. doi: 10.2196/12515.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30958269 (View on PubMed)

Thomas A, Burns R, Sanseau E, Auerbach M. Tips for Conducting Telesimulation-Based Medical Education. Cureus. 2021 Jan 4;13(1):e12479. doi: 10.7759/cureus.12479.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33552792 (View on PubMed)

Romli MH, Wan Yunus F, Cheema MS, Abdul Hamid H, Mehat MZ, Md Hashim NF, Foong CC, Hong WH, Jaafar MH. A Meta-synthesis on Technology-Based Learning Among Healthcare Students in Southeast Asia. Med Sci Educ. 2022 May 7;32(3):657-677. doi: 10.1007/s40670-022-01564-3. eCollection 2022 Jun.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35573465 (View on PubMed)

Romli MH, Foong CC, Hong WH, Subramaniam P, Wan Yunus F. Restructuring education activities for full online learning: findings from a qualitative study with Malaysian nursing students during Covid-19 pandemic. BMC Med Educ. 2022 Jul 11;22(1):535. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03587-1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35821126 (View on PubMed)

Rezaee M, Rassafiani M, Khankeh H, Hosseini MA. Experiences of occupational therapy students in the first fieldwork education: a qualitative study. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2014 Oct 11;28:110. eCollection 2014.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25664311 (View on PubMed)

Praveen, C., Herur, S., Vashisht, S., Venkatesh, V. K. & Senapati, S. (2022). A comparative study on the suitability of virtual labs for school chemistry experiments. Journal of Emerging Investigators, 5(1), 1-9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Nelson, J. (2017). Using conceptual depth criteria: addressing the challenge of reaching saturation in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 17(5), 554-570. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794116679873

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Mattila, A., Martin, R.M., DeIuliis, E.D. (2020). Simulated fieldwork: A virtual approach to clinical education. Education Sciences, 10, 272. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10100272

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Leighton, K. (2015). Development of the Clinical Learning Environment Comparison Survey. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 11(1), 44-51. doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2014.11.002

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Ingwersen K, Lyons N, Hitch D. Perceptions of fieldwork in occupational therapy. Clin Teach. 2017 Feb;14(1):55-59. doi: 10.1111/tct.12518. Epub 2016 Apr 5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27060287 (View on PubMed)

Foronda CL, Fernandez-Burgos M, Nadeau C, Kelley CN, Henry MN. Virtual Simulation in Nursing Education: A Systematic Review Spanning 1996 to 2018. Simul Healthc. 2020 Feb;15(1):46-54. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000411.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32028447 (View on PubMed)

Emslie B. Clinical occupational therapists' experience of their role as clinical educators during the fieldwork experience of occupational therapy students (master's thesis). South Africa, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch; (2012).

Reference Type BACKGROUND

DeIuliis, E., Mattila, A., & Martin, R. (2021). Level I FW in a simulated environment: A blueprint on how to use SimucaseTM. Journal of Occupational Therapy Education,5(2). Retrieved from https://encompass.eku.edu/jote/vol5/iss2/15/

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

JEP-2024-967

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.