Dietary Advice Training in Nursing Using Simulation and Interactive Fiction
NCT ID: NCT06737276
Last Updated: 2024-12-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-02-01
2022-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
OTHER
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Experimental Group 1 (EG1)
Participants received a multimodal intervention (intervention order: interactive fiction activities and role-play simulation).
Interactive fiction activities
The case studies were prepared using interactive fiction through Twine. Each case simulated a nursing consultation with a patient requiring dietary advice, and the patient's evolution depended on the students' choices. All cases created had similar structures, durations, and difficulties to avoid complexity-related bias. For each circumstance, three possible dietary advice options were offered to the patient: one option that would be ideal, one suitable option, and one unsuitable option.
Role-play simulation
Role-play activity of the nursing consultation on dietary advice according to Nemec et al. (2021) recommendations. Ten case studies of a nursing consultation on dietary advice involving a nurse and a patient were designed with the consensus of a group of nursing professionals with expertise in food and nutrition, health literacy, and communication. Each student was assigned a role and provided with the necessary information to play their character or understand their patient's context. The information provided was different according to the role assigned. They had to perform a simulation of eight minutes, similar to the time available in the student's primary care consultations in the referral health system. Thus, the patient and the family member had to explain the situation or health problem, the professional would analyse it, and together, they would try to reach a therapeutic agreement. After the consultation, a debriefing was carried out.
Experimental Group 2 (EG2)
Participants received a multimodal intervention (intervention order: role-play simulation and interactive fiction activities).
Interactive fiction activities
The case studies were prepared using interactive fiction through Twine. Each case simulated a nursing consultation with a patient requiring dietary advice, and the patient's evolution depended on the students' choices. All cases created had similar structures, durations, and difficulties to avoid complexity-related bias. For each circumstance, three possible dietary advice options were offered to the patient: one option that would be ideal, one suitable option, and one unsuitable option.
Role-play simulation
Role-play activity of the nursing consultation on dietary advice according to Nemec et al. (2021) recommendations. Ten case studies of a nursing consultation on dietary advice involving a nurse and a patient were designed with the consensus of a group of nursing professionals with expertise in food and nutrition, health literacy, and communication. Each student was assigned a role and provided with the necessary information to play their character or understand their patient's context. The information provided was different according to the role assigned. They had to perform a simulation of eight minutes, similar to the time available in the student's primary care consultations in the referral health system. Thus, the patient and the family member had to explain the situation or health problem, the professional would analyse it, and together, they would try to reach a therapeutic agreement. After the consultation, a debriefing was carried out.
Control Group (CG)
Participants received a conventional practical teaching based on lectures.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Interactive fiction activities
The case studies were prepared using interactive fiction through Twine. Each case simulated a nursing consultation with a patient requiring dietary advice, and the patient's evolution depended on the students' choices. All cases created had similar structures, durations, and difficulties to avoid complexity-related bias. For each circumstance, three possible dietary advice options were offered to the patient: one option that would be ideal, one suitable option, and one unsuitable option.
Role-play simulation
Role-play activity of the nursing consultation on dietary advice according to Nemec et al. (2021) recommendations. Ten case studies of a nursing consultation on dietary advice involving a nurse and a patient were designed with the consensus of a group of nursing professionals with expertise in food and nutrition, health literacy, and communication. Each student was assigned a role and provided with the necessary information to play their character or understand their patient's context. The information provided was different according to the role assigned. They had to perform a simulation of eight minutes, similar to the time available in the student's primary care consultations in the referral health system. Thus, the patient and the family member had to explain the situation or health problem, the professional would analyse it, and together, they would try to reach a therapeutic agreement. After the consultation, a debriefing was carried out.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Cadiz
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Antonio Jesús Marín Paz
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Antonio-Jesús Marín-Paz, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Cadiz
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Faculty of Nursing
Algeciras, Cadiz, Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D; CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. PLoS Med. 2010 Mar 24;7(3):e1000251. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000251.
World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281053. No abstract available.
Marquez-Hernandez VV, Garrido-Molina JM, Gutierrez-Puertas L, Garcia-Viola A, Aguilera-Manrique G, Granados-Gamez G. How to measure gamification experiences in nursing? Adaptation and validation of the Gameful Experience Scale [GAMEX]. Nurse Educ Today. 2019 Oct;81:34-38. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2019.07.005. Epub 2019 Jul 12.
Farres-Tarafa M, Bande D, Roldan-Merino J, Hurtado-Pardos B, Biurrun-Garrido A, Molina-Raya L, Raurell-Torreda M, Casas I, Lorenzo-Seva U. Reliability and validity study of the Spanish adaptation of the "Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale" (SCLS). PLoS One. 2021 Jul 23;16(7):e0255188. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255188. eCollection 2021.
Ludin SM. Does good critical thinking equal effective decision-making among critical care nurses? A cross-sectional survey. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2018 Feb;44:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2017.06.002. Epub 2017 Jun 26.
Correa-Rodriguez M, Pocovi G, Schmidt-RioValle J, Gonzalez-Jimenez E, Rueda-Medina B. Assessment of dietary intake in Spanish university students of health sciences. Endocrinol Diabetes Nutr (Engl Ed). 2018 May;65(5):265-273. doi: 10.1016/j.endinu.2018.01.005. Epub 2018 Mar 26. English, Spanish.
Nemec R, Brower E, Allert J. A Guide to Implementing Role-Play in the Nursing Classroom. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2021 Nov-Dec 01;42(6):E163-E164. doi: 10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000678.
Jeffries PR, Rodgers B, Adamson K. NLN Jeffries Simulation Theory: Brief Narrative Description. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2015 Sep-Oct;36(5):292-3. doi: 10.5480/1536-5026-36.5.292. No abstract available.
Dwan K, Li T, Altman DG, Elbourne D. CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised crossover trials. BMJ. 2019 Jul 31;366:l4378. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4378.
Lo YT, Yang CC, Yeh TF, Tu HY, Chang YC. Effectiveness of immersive virtual reality training in nasogastric tube feeding education: A randomized controlled trial. Nurse Educ Today. 2022 Dec;119:105601. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105601. Epub 2022 Oct 12.
Karkada S, Radhakrishnan J, Natarajan J, Matua GA, Kaddoura M. Knowledge and Competency of Novice Nursing Students in Nasogastric Tube Feeding: Is Simulation Better than Case Scenario? Oman Med J. 2019 Nov;34(6):528-533. doi: 10.5001/omj.2019.96.
Bridenbaugh JR, Tomesko J, Sandiford D, Tracey DL. Enteral Nutrition Simulation Workshop Enhances Knowledge and Skills of Graduate Nutrition Students. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2023 Apr;55(4):311-315. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2022.11.003. Epub 2023 Jan 18. No abstract available.
Tinoco JDS, Enders BC, Sonenberg A, Lira ALBC. Virtual clinical simulation in nursing education: a concept analysis. Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2021 Jun 18;18(1). doi: 10.1515/ijnes-2020-0001.
Lei YY, Zhu L, Sa YTR, Cui XS. Effects of high-fidelity simulation teaching on nursing students' knowledge, professional skills and clinical ability: A meta-analysis and systematic review. Nurse Educ Pract. 2022 Mar;60:103306. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103306. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
Bordelon CJ, Smith TS, Wood T, Watts P. Simulation to Enhance Communication Skills in Neonatal Nursing Practice. Neonatal Netw. 2020 Nov 1;39(6):347-355. doi: 10.1891/0730-0832/11-T-674.
Lame G, Dixon-Woods M. Using clinical simulation to study how to improve quality and safety in healthcare. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2020 Mar 4;6(2):87-94. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2018-000370. Epub 2018 Sep 29.
Hegland PA, Aarlie H, Stromme H, Jamtvedt G. Simulation-based training for nurses: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Nurse Educ Today. 2017 Jul;54:6-20. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.04.004. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
Shea A, Brophy L, Nininger J, Abbott M, Wilson L. Nutrition integration across the nursing curriculum: A novel teaching model within a pre-licensure program. J Prof Nurs. 2021 Nov-Dec;37(6):1162-1166. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2021.10.006. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
Gianfrancesco C, Johnson M. Exploring the provision of diabetes nutrition education by practice nurses in primary care settings. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2020 Apr;33(2):263-273. doi: 10.1111/jhn.12720. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
Tangvik RJ, Tell GS, Guttormsen AB, Eisman JA, Henriksen A, Nilsen RM, Ranhoff AH. Nutritional risk profile in a university hospital population. Clin Nutr. 2015 Aug;34(4):705-11. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2014.08.001. Epub 2014 Aug 12.
Correia MITD, Perman MI, Waitzberg DL. Hospital malnutrition in Latin America: A systematic review. Clin Nutr. 2017 Aug;36(4):958-967. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2016.06.025. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
Xu X, Parker D, Ferguson C, Hickman L. Where is the nurse in nutritional care? Contemp Nurse. 2017 Jun;53(3):267-270. doi: 10.1080/10376178.2017.1370782. No abstract available.
Gan T, Cheng HL, Tse MYM. A systematic review of nurse-led dietary interventions for cancer patients and survivors. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2021 Dec 29;9(2):81-87. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2021.12.013. eCollection 2022 Feb.
Crimarco A, Landry MJ, Gardner CD. Ultra-processed Foods, Weight Gain, and Co-morbidity Risk. Curr Obes Rep. 2022 Sep;11(3):80-92. doi: 10.1007/s13679-021-00460-y. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
Chen Z, Khandpur N, Desjardins C, Wang L, Monteiro CA, Rossato SL, Fung TT, Manson JE, Willett WC, Rimm EB, Hu FB, Sun Q, Drouin-Chartier JP. Ultra-Processed Food Consumption and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes: Three Large Prospective U.S. Cohort Studies. Diabetes Care. 2023 Jul 1;46(7):1335-1344. doi: 10.2337/dc22-1993.
Pagliai G, Dinu M, Madarena MP, Bonaccio M, Iacoviello L, Sofi F. Consumption of ultra-processed foods and health status: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Nutr. 2021 Feb 14;125(3):308-318. doi: 10.1017/S0007114520002688. Epub 2020 Aug 14.
Elizabeth L, Machado P, Zinocker M, Baker P, Lawrence M. Ultra-Processed Foods and Health Outcomes: A Narrative Review. Nutrients. 2020 Jun 30;12(7):1955. doi: 10.3390/nu12071955.
Blanco-Rojo R, Sandoval-Insausti H, Lopez-Garcia E, Graciani A, Ordovas JM, Banegas JR, Rodriguez-Artalejo F, Guallar-Castillon P. Consumption of Ultra-Processed Foods and Mortality: A National Prospective Cohort in Spain. Mayo Clin Proc. 2019 Nov;94(11):2178-2188. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.03.035. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
Mazza E, Ferro Y, Pujia R, Mare R, Maurotti S, Montalcini T, Pujia A. Mediterranean Diet In Healthy Aging. J Nutr Health Aging. 2021;25(9):1076-1083. doi: 10.1007/s12603-021-1675-6.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
sol-202200229602-tra
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id