Rotator Cuff Tears Treated With Long Head of the Biceps Reinforcement
NCT ID: NCT06664645
Last Updated: 2025-06-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-01-14
2025-04-14
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
An alternative in rotator cuff injuries is the use of the long head of the biceps (LHB) as an autologous graft to increase the healing rate and the final outcomes.
The primary objective is to compare the functional results, according to the ASES score, between patients who use or not the long head biceps brace for complete repairs of large and extensive rotator cuff tears.
The secondary objectives are to compare the groups according to structural results by MRI and functional results by the UCLA score.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears Treatment. Comparison of Two Methods: With and Without Biceps Tendon Augmentation
NCT05001581
Tenotomy or Tenodesis of Long Head Biceps in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair
NCT02655848
Outcomes of Massive Rotator Cuff Tendon Tear Treatment.
NCT06016439
Rotator Cuff Failure With Continuity
NCT02716441
Platelet Rich Plasma on Rotator Cuff Repair
NCT01029574
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Patients with an intact long head of the biceps will be randomized into two groups, according to the use or not of the tendon: complete repair with LHB tendon reinforcement and complete repair without reinforcement. All patients will be operated by the same surgeon.
All selected patients will be explained what the research is about by a research assistant not involved in the treatment and will be offered the option to participate or not.
The "American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form" (ASES) scale will be adopted as the primary outcome. The "Modified University of California at Los Angeles Shoulder Rating Scale" (UCLA) and the assessment of tendon healing with magnetic resonance imaging at 6 months after surgery, using the classification of Sugaya et al. will be secondary outcomes.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
Patients with an intact long head of the biceps will be randomized into two groups, according to the use or not of the tendon: complete repair with LHB tendon reinforcement and complete repair without reinforcement.
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
complete repair with LHB tendon reinforcement
complete repair with LHB tendon reinforcement
LHB tendon reinforcement
complete repair with LHB tendon reinforcement
complete repair without reinforcement
complete repair without reinforcement.
complete repair without reinforcement
conventional rotator cuff complete repair without reinforcement
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
LHB tendon reinforcement
complete repair with LHB tendon reinforcement
complete repair without reinforcement
conventional rotator cuff complete repair without reinforcement
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Large or extensive posterosuperior rotator cuff injuries according to the classification of DeOrio and Cofield;20
* Fatty degeneration of the ≦2 supraspinatus muscle according to the classification of Goutallier.21
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients unable to understand preoperative questionnaires;
* Patient who does not undergo at least 1 postoperative evaluation.
* Injury where complete repair of the rotator cuff is not possible;
* Rupture of the LHB tendon diagnosed intraoperatively.
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hospital Universitario Pedro Ernesto
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
GUSTAVO DE MELLO RIBEIRO PINTO
Principal investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
hospital Universitário Pedro Ernesto
Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Barth J, Olmos MI, Swan J, Barthelemy R, Delsol P, Boutsiadis A. Superior Capsular Reconstruction With the Long Head of the Biceps Autograft Prevents Infraspinatus Retear in Massive Posterosuperior Retracted Rotator Cuff Tears. Am J Sports Med. 2020 May;48(6):1430-1438. doi: 10.1177/0363546520912220. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
Rhee SM, Youn SM, Park JH, Rhee YG. Biceps Rerouting for Semirigid Large-to-Massive Rotator Cuff Tears. Arthroscopy. 2021 Sep;37(9):2769-2779. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.04.008. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
Cho NS, Yi JW, Rhee YG. Arthroscopic biceps augmentation for avoiding undue tension in repair of massive rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy. 2009 Feb;25(2):183-91. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2008.09.012. Epub 2008 Nov 1.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
53239121.4.0000.5259
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.