Comparison of Outcomes of Rotator Cuff Repair With a Modified Versus Classic Double-Row Suture -Bridge Techniques
NCT ID: NCT06394856
Last Updated: 2024-06-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
89 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-07-01
2021-07-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of Medial Supraspinatus Muscle Release in Treatment of Retracted Rotator Cuff Tear
NCT06648941
Arthroscopic Repair Of Partial Thickness Articular Side Rotator Cuff Tears Using Transtendon Versus Conversion Repair Techniques
NCT06870708
Comparison of Two Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Techniques: Knot-tying Versus Knotless Suture-bridge Technique
NCT03982108
Arthroscopic Repair of Partial Thickness Articular-Side Rotator Cuff Tears: Transtendon Versus Conversion Repair Techniques
NCT07289659
Rotator Cuff Repair With Arthroscopic Acromioplasty (Shaving the Acromion Bone) Versus Repair Without Acromioplasty
NCT00664794
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
knotless group
rotator cuff repair with a modified knotless anchors
Rotator Cuff Repair With a Modified Versus Classic Double-Row Suture -Bridge Techniques
rotator cuff tears with modified versus classic double row suture bridge
knot-tying group
rotator cuff repair with classic knot-tying double-row suture bridge technique by classic anchors
Rotator Cuff Repair With a Modified Versus Classic Double-Row Suture -Bridge Techniques
rotator cuff tears with modified versus classic double row suture bridge
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Rotator Cuff Repair With a Modified Versus Classic Double-Row Suture -Bridge Techniques
rotator cuff tears with modified versus classic double row suture bridge
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* degenerative tears
* age range 40 :65
Exclusion Criteria
* small and massive tears
* traumatic tears
* partial -thickness tear
* revisioin surgery
* glenohumeral arthretic changes and shoulder instability
40 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sohag University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Hossam Eldin Mohamed Ahmed ElAzab
assistant professor orthopedic department
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Hossam M azab, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Sohag University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
university Hospital
Sohag, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Soh-Med-23-04-01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.