Does the Suture-spanning Augmentation of Single-row Repair in Massive Rotator Cuff Tear Reduce the Retear Rate?

NCT ID: NCT03609164

Last Updated: 2018-08-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

80 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-05-01

Study Completion Date

2018-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

There are several associated structural changes when dealing with massive rotator cuff repair, which include tendon retraction and fragility, muscle atrophy and fatty infiltration, as well as osteoporosis over the tendon insertion. Those changes may lead to difficult in applying double-row repair, suture cutting through the tendon, too much tension over the repair and loosening or pull-out of anchors, which may results in poor tendon-bone healing and subsequent high re-tear rate. Therefore decreasing the tension over the repair site may increase the healing over tendon bone junction as well as decrease the risk of anchors loosening. A suture-spanning augmentation with two set of suture loops passing over musculotendinous junction medially and fixed with anchor at the lateral cortical wall may solve the problem. In order to define the clinical benefit of this adjuvant procedure, a prospective randomized control study is designed to compare the adjunctive reinforce suture with the single-row simple suture repair in massive rotator cuff tear.

Around sixty patients were randomized divided into two groups. The study group was used adjunctive reinforce suture repair technique, which was one lateral cortical anchor holding 2 separated set of transverse looping sutures over the medial musculotendinous junction in addition to single row repair, while the control group was used single row repair technique in simple stitch fashion. All patients will have clinical evaluation in pain (VAS score) and functional recovery (ASES and UCLA score) as well as MRI image for the tendon integrity.

If the suture-spanning augmentation of single-row repair can yield an improved healing rate and fewer complications, massive rotator cuff tear should be repaired earlier in order to prevent the late development of irreparable tear.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Rotator Cuff Tear

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Suture-spanning augmentation of single-row repair

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Suture-bridge augmentation of single-row repair

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

single-row repair

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Suture-bridge augmentation of single-row repair

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Suture-bridge augmentation of single-row repair

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* the pre-operative image (MRI) showing the massive rotator cuff tear (fulfilling one of the following definition a tear with a diameter of 5 cm or more; a complete tear of two or more tendons; one with a coronal length and sagittal width greater than or equal to 2 cm)
* patient was willing and able to provide scores for the study

Exclusion Criteria

* irreparable rotator cuff tear which was identified pre-operatively or intra-operatively
* glenohumeral or acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis
* stage III or more of the fatty degenerative of supraspinatus in Goutallier classification
* revision surgery
* patients with bacteremia, a systemic infection, or an infection at the surgical site
* patients who previously attempted or failed a treatment program
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Hsiao-Li Ma, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hsiao-Li

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Taiwan

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ma HH, Chen KH, Chiang ER, Chou TA, Ma HL. Does Arthroscopic Suture-Spanning Augmentation of Single-Row Repair Reduce the Retear Rate of Massive Rotator Cuff Tear? Am J Sports Med. 2019 May;47(6):1420-1426. doi: 10.1177/0363546519836419. Epub 2019 Apr 18.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30998402 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

104-2314-B-075-082

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

RSA Vs RCR for Massive RCTs
NCT05807854 RECRUITING NA
Rotator Cuff Failure With Continuity
NCT02716441 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING