Subscapularis Tears in Large to Massive Rotator Cuff Tear

NCT ID: NCT03352180

Last Updated: 2017-11-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

150 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-11-21

Study Completion Date

2019-07-11

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Do concomitant subscapularis tears in large to massive rotator cuff tears affect postoperative functional and structural outcomes?

Background and purpose:

The subscarpularis tendon is essential force maintaining normal glenohumeral biomechanics. However, there are few studies which have addressed the outcomes of tears extending to the subscapularis tendon in massive rotator cuff tears. The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical and structural outcomes of arthroscopic reapair of massive rotator cuff tears involving the subscapulrais.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

MATRALS AND METHODS This retrospective comparative study was approved by our institutional review board.

Patient Selection This study targeted patients who had undergone arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, which was performed by a single surgeon in our institution between January 2010 and January 2014.

The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) a full-thickness superoposterior rotator cuff tear larger than 5 cm(19) or complete superoposterior rotator cuff tear(24) identified on preoperative MRI and intra operative arthroscopic findings, (2) a follow-up MRI evaluation at 6 months after surgery, and (3) a clinical assessment performed a minimum 2 years postoperatively. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) small, medium, or large tears(21); (2) a partial-thickness tear; (3) an isolated subscapularis tear; (4) failure of subscapularis repair at the time of the index procedure; (5) previous rotator cuff surgery of the affected shoulder; (6) concomitant surgery for glenohumeral joint instability or other bony procedure; and (7) substantial glenohumeral arthritis (Hamada classification29 grade 4) or inflammatory arthropathy of the affected shoulder.

Tear Classification Rotator cuff tear patterns were classified into the following 3 categories according to the tear size of the subscapularis tendon on preoperative MRI: I-massive tear, intact subscapularis tendon; S-massive tear, tear involving half or less than half of the subscapularis tendon; and L-massive tear, tear extending to more than half of the subscapularis tendon.

Clinical Assessments Clinical data were recorded on the day before surgery and at final follow-up (at least 24 months postoperatively) by fellowship trainees. Four outcome measures were used in this study: VAS pain score, ASES score, Constant score, and active shoulder ROM. The ASES score involves a score summation using a 100-point system (50 points for daily function and 50 points for pain).

Radiographic Evaluation A standard set of plain radiographs was obtained as follows: anteroposterior (AP) views in internal rotation and external rotation, supraspinatus outlet view, axillary view, and Rockwood view (30 caudally angled AP view). We evaluated fatty degeneration of the rotator cuff muscle preoperatively with MRI, using the 5-stage grading system27: grade 0, no fatty deposit; grade 1, some fatty streaks; grade 2, more muscle than fat; grade 3, as much muscle as fat; and grade 4, less muscle than fat. The integrity of rotator cuff repair was determined by ultrasonographic evaluation. All patients underwent a postoperative ultrasonographic examination at 4.5 months and 12 months or later after surgery. One specialized radiologist with more than 10 years of experience in musculoskeletal ultrasonography performed all follow-up examinations using an HDI 5000 system or an IU-22 system (both from Philips Healthcare). He did not receive any information on intraoperative findings and subsequent operative procedures. An ultrasonographic evaluation of the rotator cuff was performed according to the standard protocol.42 The ultrasound criteria for the diagnosis of full-thickness rotator cuff tears were as follows5,54: (1) absence of observation of the supraspinatus tendon attributable to retraction under the acromioclavicular joint; (2) localized absence or focal discontinuity of the rotator cuff with concomitant loss of the normal anterior arc of the subdeltoid bursa; (3) loss of the normal supraspinatus substance with widening of the gap between the supraspinatus and biceps tendons, including exposure of a bare area of bone and cartilage; (4) a hypoechoic or anechoic cleft extending through the entire substance of the rotator cuff; and (5) coexistence of fluid in the subacromial-subdeltoid bursa and/or presence of fluid in the sheath of the long head of the biceps tendon. Partialthickness tears were diagnosed based on the presence of a focal hypoechoic or anechoic defect in the tendon, involving either the bursal or articular surface and manifesting in 2 perpendicular planes.54

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Massive Rotator Cuff Tears

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

subscapularis tendon repair

arthroscopic reapir of subscapularis tendon

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

arthroscopic reapir of subscapularis tendon

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

arthroscopic reapir of massive rotator cuff tears involving the subscapularis.

subscapularis tendon debridement

arthroscopic debredement of subscapularis tendon

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

arthroscopic debridement of subscapularis tendon

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

arthroscopic debridement of massive rotator cuff tears involving the subscapularis.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

arthroscopic reapir of subscapularis tendon

arthroscopic reapir of massive rotator cuff tears involving the subscapularis.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

arthroscopic debridement of subscapularis tendon

arthroscopic debridement of massive rotator cuff tears involving the subscapularis.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. a full-thickness superoposterior rotator cuff tear larger than 5 cm or complete superoposterior rotator cuff tear identified on preoperative MRI and intra operative arthroscopic findings
2. a follow-up MRI evaluation at 6 months after surgery, and
3. a clinical assessment performed a minimum 2 years postoperatively.

Exclusion Criteria

1. small, medium, or large tears
2. a partial-thickness tear
3. an isolated subscapularis tear
4. failure of subscapularis repair at the time of the index procedure
5. previous rotator cuff surgery of the affected shoulder
6. concomitant surgery for glenohumeral joint instability or other bony procedure
7. substantial glenohumeral arthritis (Hamada classification grade 4) or inflammatory arthropathy of the affected shoulder.
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Wonkwang University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jeong Woo Kim

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Wonkwang University Hospital, Iksan, Korea Professor Jeong Woo Kim, MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Wonkwang University Hospital

Iksan, Jeollabuk-do, South Korea

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Jeong Woo Kim

Role: CONTACT

Phone: 82-10-8648-7514

Email: [email protected]

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Jeong Woo Kim

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

201608-HR091

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id