Single Versus Double Row Suture Anchor Repair in Medium to Large Rotator Cuff Tears

NCT ID: NCT01039571

Last Updated: 2011-04-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

71 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2005-01-31

Study Completion Date

2010-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether double row repair is better in healing than traditional single row repair in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Our null hypothesis is there are no differences in clinical and structural results

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Rotator Cuff Tear

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

double row repair

double row repair for torn rotator cuff were performed to compare with the conventional single row repair

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

dual row repair

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Rotator cuff tears
* tear size between 2cm\~4cm

Exclusion Criteria

* Subscapularis tear requiring repair
* open repair
* any prior history of surgery on the affected shoulder
* any fracture history around shoulder girdle(clavicle, humerus, acromion)
* glenohumeral joint arthritis
* inflammatory arthropathy
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Samsung Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Samsung Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Samsung Medical Center

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Grasso A, Milano G, Salvatore M, Falcone G, Deriu L, Fabbriciani C. Single-row versus double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a prospective randomized clinical study. Arthroscopy. 2009 Jan;25(1):4-12. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2008.09.018. Epub 2008 Nov 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19111212 (View on PubMed)

Burks RT, Crim J, Brown N, Fink B, Greis PE. A prospective randomized clinical trial comparing arthroscopic single- and double-row rotator cuff repair: magnetic resonance imaging and early clinical evaluation. Am J Sports Med. 2009 Apr;37(4):674-82. doi: 10.1177/0363546508328115. Epub 2009 Feb 9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19204365 (View on PubMed)

Franceschi F, Ruzzini L, Longo UG, Martina FM, Zobel BB, Maffulli N, Denaro V. Equivalent clinical results of arthroscopic single-row and double-row suture anchor repair for rotator cuff tears: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med. 2007 Aug;35(8):1254-60. doi: 10.1177/0363546507302218. Epub 2007 Jun 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17554104 (View on PubMed)

Charousset C, Grimberg J, Duranthon LD, Bellaiche L, Petrover D. Can a double-row anchorage technique improve tendon healing in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair?: A prospective, nonrandomized, comparative study of double-row and single-row anchorage techniques with computed tomographic arthrography tendon healing assessment. Am J Sports Med. 2007 Aug;35(8):1247-53. doi: 10.1177/0363546507301661. Epub 2007 Apr 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17452513 (View on PubMed)

Mazzocca AD, Millett PJ, Guanche CA, Santangelo SA, Arciero RA. Arthroscopic single-row versus double-row suture anchor rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med. 2005 Dec;33(12):1861-8. doi: 10.1177/0363546505279575. Epub 2005 Oct 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16210578 (View on PubMed)

Park JY, Lhee SH, Choi JH, Park HK, Yu JW, Seo JB. Comparison of the clinical outcomes of single- and double-row repairs in rotator cuff tears. Am J Sports Med. 2008 Jul;36(7):1310-6. doi: 10.1177/0363546508315039. Epub 2008 Apr 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18413680 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2005-12-005

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.