Types of Fixation in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair

NCT ID: NCT00508183

Last Updated: 2020-04-01

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

90 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-06-30

Study Completion Date

2011-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The study will identify if there is a difference of quality of life after surgery between two techniques used in surgery. The two different techniques are either the Single Row Fixation or the Double Row Fixation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Primary Research Question; What is the difference in disease specific quality of life between patients who undergo a repair of the rotator cuff with arthroscopic technique using single-row fixation, versus double-row fixation, as measured by the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC)at one year post op?

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Rotator Cuff Tear

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

single row fixation

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

single row

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

This method involves using a single row of anchor(s) to reattach the cuff to the bone.

double row fixation

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

double row fixation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

This technique, "double row" fixation, involves adding an extra anchor(s) over the number used for single row fixation. This extra anchor(s) is placed further inside the bone and may help to increase the fixation strength of the repair.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

single row

This method involves using a single row of anchor(s) to reattach the cuff to the bone.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

double row fixation

This technique, "double row" fixation, involves adding an extra anchor(s) over the number used for single row fixation. This extra anchor(s) is placed further inside the bone and may help to increase the fixation strength of the repair.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients who have failed standard non-surgical management of their rotator cuff tear, and who would benefit from a surgical repair of the cuff.
* Imaging and intra-operative findings confirming a full thickness tear of the rotator cuff.

Exclusion Criteria

* Characteristics of the cuff tear that render the cuff irrepairable.
* Significant shoulder comorbidities
* Previous surgery on affected shoulder
* Patients with active workers compensation claims
* Active joint or systemic infection
* Significant muscle paralysis
* Rotatorcuff tear arthropathy
* Charcots arthropathy
* Major medical illness
* Unable to speak or read English
* Psychiatric illness that precludes informed consent
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Peter Lapner, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

OHRI

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The Ottawa Hospital

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lapner PL, Sabri E, Rakhra K, McRae S, Leiter J, Bell K, Macdonald P. A multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing single-row with double-row fixation in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Jul 18;94(14):1249-57. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00999.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 22810395 (View on PubMed)

Lapner P, Li A, Pollock JW, Zhang T, McIlquham K, McRae S, MacDonald P. A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Single-Row With Double-Row Fixation in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: Long-Term Follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2021 Sep;49(11):3021-3029. doi: 10.1177/03635465211029029. Epub 2021 Aug 16.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34398641 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

OHREB2006862-01H

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Superior Capsule vs Bridging Study
NCT04965103 COMPLETED NA