Comparative Effectiveness of Operative Versus Non-Operative Treatments for Rotator Cuff Tears

NCT ID: NCT02287090

Last Updated: 2025-02-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

400 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-03-31

Study Completion Date

2024-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Rotator cuff tears are one of the most common causes of shoulder pain. Evidence-based guidance on optimal diagnostic and treatment strategies for rotator cuff tears is lacking. Our proposed study aims to fill these gaps by identifying the prognostic factors which will predict better outcomes of rotator cuff tears, based on both operative and non-operative treatment. The investigators will also compare outcomes of operative and non-operative treatment of rotator cuff tears and report on the best way to diagnose rotator cuff tears.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Rotator cuff tears account for over one quarter million surgeries annually. They are a leading cause of shoulder pain and disability. Patients with rotator cuff tears present with shoulder pain and/or limitation in range of motion. Fourteen special physical exam tests have been described for diagnosis of rotator cuff tears. Prior literature describing sensitivity and specificity of these tests in diagnosing cuff tears is limited by retrospective design, small sample sizes, samples restricted to patients undergoing surgery, and failure to differentiate between partial and full thickness tears. As a result, there is little evidence to help clinicians interpret the diagnostic value of the clinical exam. Consequently, clinicians rely heavily on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for diagnosing cuff tears, adding considerable expense in the diagnostic process.

The treatment options for rotator cuff tears are operative and non-operative. There is currently little consensus on indications and timing of rotator cuff surgery or non-operative treatment. Furthermore, there is lack of evidence-based guidance on factors associated with outcomes of operative versus non-operative treatment for cuff tears.

We are enrolling patients in a prospective cohort study to assess comparative-effectiveness of operative versus non-operative treatment of rotator cuff tears and understand prognostic factors for better outcomes after surgery and non-operative treatments.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Rotator Cuff Tear

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Observational Cohort

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age 45 or older
* Symptoms for at least 4 weeks of shoulder pain and/or limitation in range of motion of shoulder

Exclusion Criteria

* History of humeral fractures
* Prior surgery on the same shoulder
* Contraindications to MRI (prior surgical hardware, pacemakers, defibrillators, and claustrophobia)
* Unable or unwilling to give informed consent
* Unable or unwilling to be followed up
* Non-English speaking (as questionnaires have only been validated in English)
Minimum Eligible Age

45 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Brigham and Women's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Orthopedic Institute, Sioux Falls, SD

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Texas

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Nitin Jain

Associate Professor of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and Orthopaedics

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Nitin B Jain, MD, MSPH

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Vanderbilt University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Brigham and Women's Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Orthopaedic Institute

Sioux Falls, South Dakota, United States

Site Status

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

University of Texas Southwestern

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

K23AR059199

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

140857

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Results of Rotator Cuff Repair
NCT01549912 COMPLETED