Comparative Effectiveness of Operative Versus Non-Operative Treatments for Rotator Cuff Tears
NCT ID: NCT02287090
Last Updated: 2025-02-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
400 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2011-03-31
2024-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Features to Predict Success With Nonoperative Treatment of Patients With Rotator Cuff Tears
NCT00762580
Operative Versus Non-Operative Treatment for Atraumatic Rotator Cuff Tears
NCT03295994
Comparing the Outcomes Between Rotator Cuff Repair With and Without Suprascapular Nerve Decompression
NCT02107573
Comparison of Partial Rotator Cuff Repair vs. Superior Capsular Reconstruction for Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears
NCT04742452
Outcomes After Repair of Acute Rotator Cuff Tears
NCT01140230
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The treatment options for rotator cuff tears are operative and non-operative. There is currently little consensus on indications and timing of rotator cuff surgery or non-operative treatment. Furthermore, there is lack of evidence-based guidance on factors associated with outcomes of operative versus non-operative treatment for cuff tears.
We are enrolling patients in a prospective cohort study to assess comparative-effectiveness of operative versus non-operative treatment of rotator cuff tears and understand prognostic factors for better outcomes after surgery and non-operative treatments.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Observational Cohort
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Symptoms for at least 4 weeks of shoulder pain and/or limitation in range of motion of shoulder
Exclusion Criteria
* Prior surgery on the same shoulder
* Contraindications to MRI (prior surgical hardware, pacemakers, defibrillators, and claustrophobia)
* Unable or unwilling to give informed consent
* Unable or unwilling to be followed up
* Non-English speaking (as questionnaires have only been validated in English)
45 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)
NIH
Brigham and Women's Hospital
OTHER
Orthopedic Institute, Sioux Falls, SD
OTHER
University of Texas
OTHER
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Nitin Jain
Associate Professor of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and Orthopaedics
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Nitin B Jain, MD, MSPH
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Vanderbilt University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Orthopaedic Institute
Sioux Falls, South Dakota, United States
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
University of Texas Southwestern
Dallas, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
140857
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.