Features to Predict Success With Nonoperative Treatment of Patients With Rotator Cuff Tears
NCT ID: NCT00762580
Last Updated: 2024-01-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
452 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2006-01-31
2024-01-11
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparative Effectiveness of Operative Versus Non-Operative Treatments for Rotator Cuff Tears
NCT02287090
Post-op Rehabilitation's Influence on Tendon Healing & Clinical Outcomes Following Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair
NCT00756015
A Pilot Cohort Study of Surgical and Non-surgical Management of Rotator Cuff Tears
NCT03021733
Validation of an Upper Extremity Physical Performance Test Battery in Patients After Shoulder Dislocation
NCT07115225
Cohort of Patients With a Symptomatic Rotator Cuff Tear Treated Without Surgical Repair
NCT02510352
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Study the effect of historical information on predicting success (as determined by pain relief and patient satisfaction) of nonoperative treatment using the EBM based physical therapy program in treating patients with rotator cuff tears.
Study the effect of physical examination findings on predicting success of a nonoperative treatment using the EBM-based physical therapy program in treating patients with rotator cuff tears.
Study the effect of the severity of the rotator cuff pathology (using standardized magnetic resonance imaging protocols) on predicting success of nonoperative treatment for patients with rotator cuff tears using the EBM-based physical therapy program.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Prospective
Patients with full thickness rotator cuff tears being treated with physical therapy
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Note: Criteria to obtain a shoulder MRI to evaluate for rotator cuff tear \[Appendix D\]:
1. Significant weakness (≥ 2 points per guidelines above.)
2. ADL pain or night pain \>/= 7 on VAS
3. Significant impingement (per guidelines above) + with significant symptoms for ≥ 3 months.
Exclusion Criteria
* Associated dislocations
* Associated fractures
* Systemic Rheumatologic disease, i.e. Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosis
* Patients being treated for bilateral rotator cuff tears simultaneously
* Patients unable to complete the forms
* Pain from neck or scapula
* Previous shoulder surgery
* Glenohumeral arthritis (meets ≥ 1 of below criteria)
* osteophytes \>2mm on humeral head or glenoid
* Joint space narrowing with sclerosis or cyst formation seen on true AP or axillary radiographs;
* humeral head contacting acromion
* Adhesive capsulitis
18 Years
100 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Colorado, Denver
OTHER
Ohio State University
OTHER
University of Iowa
OTHER
University of California, San Francisco
OTHER
Arthrex, Inc.
INDUSTRY
Knoxville Orthopedic Clinic
OTHER
Washington University School of Medicine
OTHER
Sports Medicine and Shoulder Surgery Orthopedic Institute
UNKNOWN
Hospital for Special Surgery, New York
OTHER
Vanderbilt University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Rosemary A. Sanders
Research Coordinator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
John E. Kuhn, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Colorado University Sports Medicine
Boulder, Colorado, United States
Universtiy Of Iowa
Iowa City, Iowa, United States
University of California at San Francisco
San Francisco, California, United States
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington Universtiy School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Hospital for Special Surgery
New York, New York, United States
Ohio State
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Sports Medicine & Shoulder Surgery, Orthopedic Institute
Sioux Falls, South Dakota, United States
Shoulder and Elbow Institute, Knoxville Orthopaedic Clinic
Knoxville, Tennessee, United States
Vanderbilt Universtiy Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Bartolozzi A, Andreychik D, Ahmad S. Determinants of outcome in the treatment of rotator cuff disease. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 Nov;(308):90-7.
Bokor DJ, Hawkins RJ, Huckell GH, Angelo RL, Schickendantz MS. Results of nonoperative management of full-thickness tears of the rotator cuff. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993 Sep;(294):103-10.
Chard MD, Hazleman R, Hazleman BL, King RH, Reiss BB. Shoulder disorders in the elderly: a community survey. Arthritis Rheum. 1991 Jun;34(6):766-9. doi: 10.1002/art.1780340619.
Charlson M, Szatrowski TP, Peterson J, Gold J. Validation of a combined comorbidity index. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994 Nov;47(11):1245-51. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(94)90129-5.
Djurasovic M, Marra G, Arroyo JS, Pollock RG, Flatow EL, Bigliani LU. Revision rotator cuff repair: factors influencing results. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001 Dec;83(12):1849-55. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200112000-00013.
Ejnisman B, Andreoli CV, Soares BG, Fallopa F, Peccin MS, Abdalla RJ, Cohen M. Interventions for tears of the rotator cuff in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(1):CD002758. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002758.pub2.
Feng S, Guo S, Nobuhara K, Hashimoto J, Mimori K. Prognostic indicators for outcome following rotator cuff tear repair. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2003 Dec;11(2):110-6. doi: 10.1177/230949900301100202.
Galatz LM, Ball CM, Teefey SA, Middleton WD, Yamaguchi K. The outcome and repair integrity of completely arthroscopically repaired large and massive rotator cuff tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Feb;86(2):219-24. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200402000-00002.
Gerber C, Fuchs B, Hodler J. The results of repair of massive tears of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000 Apr;82(4):505-15. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200004000-00006.
Habernek H, Schmid L, Frauenschuh E. Five year results of rotator cuff repair. Br J Sports Med. 1999 Dec;33(6):430-3. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.33.6.430.
Harryman DT 2nd, Mack LA, Wang KY, Jackins SE, Richardson ML, Matsen FA 3rd. Repairs of the rotator cuff. Correlation of functional results with integrity of the cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991 Aug;73(7):982-9.
Hattrup SJ. Rotator cuff repair: relevance of patient age. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1995 Mar-Apr;4(2):95-100. doi: 10.1016/s1058-2746(05)80061-8.
Itoi E, Tabata S. Conservative treatment of rotator cuff tears. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992 Feb;(275):165-73.
Itoi E, Tabata S. Incomplete rotator cuff tears. Results of operative treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992 Nov;(284):128-35.
Kim SH, Ha KI, Park JH, Kang JS, Oh SK, Oh I. Arthroscopic versus mini-open salvage repair of the rotator cuff tear: outcome analysis at 2 to 6 years' follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2003 Sep;19(7):746-54. doi: 10.1016/s0749-8063(03)00395-5.
Kirkley A, Griffin S, McLintock H, Ng L. The development and evaluation of a disease-specific quality of life measurement tool for shoulder instability. The Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI). Am J Sports Med. 1998 Nov-Dec;26(6):764-72. doi: 10.1177/03635465980260060501.
Knudsen HB, Gelineck J, Sojbjerg JO, Olsen BS, Johannsen HV, Sneppen O. Functional and magnetic resonance imaging evaluation after single-tendon rotator cuff reconstruction. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1999 May-Jun;8(3):242-6. doi: 10.1016/s1058-2746(99)90136-2.
Lehman C, Cuomo F, Kummer FJ, Zuckerman JD. The incidence of full thickness rotator cuff tears in a large cadaveric population. Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 1995;54(1):30-1.
Lopez JG, Ernst MD, Wright TW. Acromioplasty: comparison of outcome in patients with and without workers' compensation. J South Orthop Assoc. 2000 Winter;9(4):262-6.
Massoud SN, Levy O, Copeland SA. Subacromial decompression. Treatment for small- and medium-sized tears of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002 Sep;84(7):955-60. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.84b7.12378.
Motycka T, Kriegleder B, Landsiedl F. Results of open repair of the rotator cuff--a long-term review of 79 shoulders. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2001;121(3):148-51. doi: 10.1007/s004020000199.
Patel VR, Singh D, Calvert PT, Bayley JI. Arthroscopic subacromial decompression: results and factors affecting outcome. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1999 May-Jun;8(3):231-7. doi: 10.1016/s1058-2746(99)90134-9.
Romeo AA, Hang DW, Bach BR Jr, Shott S. Repair of full thickness rotator cuff tears. Gender, age, and other factors affecting outcome. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999 Oct;(367):243-55.
Sallay PI, Reed L. The measurement of normative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2003 Nov-Dec;12(6):622-7. doi: 10.1016/s1058-2746(03)00209-x.
Sher JS, Uribe JW, Posada A, Murphy BJ, Zlatkin MB. Abnormal findings on magnetic resonance images of asymptomatic shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995 Jan;77(1):10-5. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199501000-00002.
Silverstein B, Welp E, Nelson N, Kalat J. Claims incidence of work-related disorders of the upper extremities: Washington state, 1987 through 1995. Am J Public Health. 1998 Dec;88(12):1827-33. doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.12.1827.
Silverstein B, Viikari-Juntura E, Kalat J. Use of a prevention index to identify industries at high risk for work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the neck, back, and upper extremity in Washington state, 1990-1998. Am J Ind Med. 2002 Mar;41(3):149-69. doi: 10.1002/ajim.10054.
Spangehl MJ, Hawkins RH, McCormack RG, Loomer RL. Arthroscopic versus open acromioplasty: a prospective, randomized, blinded study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002 Mar-Apr;11(2):101-7. doi: 10.1067/mse.2002.120915.
Tempelhof S, Rupp S, Seil R. Age-related prevalence of rotator cuff tears in asymptomatic shoulders. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1999 Jul-Aug;8(4):296-9. doi: 10.1016/s1058-2746(99)90148-9.
Thomazeau H, Boukobza E, Morcet N, Chaperon J, Langlais F. Prediction of rotator cuff repair results by magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997 Nov;(344):275-83.
Vitale MG, Krant JJ, Gelijns AC, Heitjan DF, Arons RR, Bigliani LU, Flatow EL. Geographic variations in the rates of operative procedures involving the shoulder, including total shoulder replacement, humeral head replacement, and rotator cuff repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999 Jun;81(6):763-72. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199906000-00003.
Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473-83.
Worland RL, Arredondo J, Angles F, Lopez-Jimenez F. Repair of massive rotator cuff tears in patients older than 70 years. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1999 Jan-Feb;8(1):26-30. doi: 10.1016/s1058-2746(99)90050-2.
Worland RL, Lee D, Orozco CG, SozaRex F, Keenan J. Correlation of age, acromial morphology, and rotator cuff tear pathology diagnosed by ultrasound in asymptomatic patients. J South Orthop Assoc. 2003 Spring;12(1):23-6.
Yamaguchi K, Tetro AM, Blam O, Evanoff BA, Teefey SA, Middleton WD. Natural history of asymptomatic rotator cuff tears: a longitudinal analysis of asymptomatic tears detected sonographically. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2001 May-Jun;10(3):199-203. doi: 10.1067/mse.2001.113086.
Zanetti M, Jost B, Hodler J, Gerber C. MR imaging after rotator cuff repair: full-thickness defects and bursitis-like subacromial abnormalities in asymptomatic subjects. Skeletal Radiol. 2000 Jun;29(6):314-9. doi: 10.1007/s002560000203.
Ellman H, Kay SP, Wirth M. Arthroscopic treatment of full-thickness rotator cuff tears: 2- to 7-year follow-up study. Arthroscopy. 1993;9(2):195-200. doi: 10.1016/s0749-8063(05)80374-3.
Goutallier D, Postel JM, Gleyze P, Leguilloux P, Van Driessche S. Influence of cuff muscle fatty degeneration on anatomic and functional outcomes after simple suture of full-thickness tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2003 Nov-Dec;12(6):550-4. doi: 10.1016/s1058-2746(03)00211-8.
Hawker G, Melfi C, Paul J, Green R, Bombardier C. Comparison of a generic (SF-36) and a disease specific (WOMAC) (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index) instrument in the measurement of outcomes after knee replacement surgery. J Rheumatol. 1995 Jun;22(6):1193-6.
Irrgang JJ, Anderson AF. Development and validation of health-related quality of life measures for the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002 Sep;(402):95-109. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200209000-00009.
McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Lu JF, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med Care. 1994 Jan;32(1):40-66. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199401000-00004.
Small NC, Sledge CB, Katz JN. A conceptual framework for outcomes research in arthroscopic meniscectomy: results of a nominal group process. Arthroscopy. 1994 Oct;10(5):486-92. doi: 10.1016/s0749-8063(05)80002-7.
Ciepiela MD, Burkhead WZ. Classification of Rotator Cuff Tears. In: Burkhead WZ, ed. Rotator Cuff Disorders.Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 1996.
Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 1960;20:37-46.
Jost B, Pfirrmann CW, Gerber C, Switzerland Z. Clinical outcome after structural failure of rotator cuff repairs. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000 Mar;82(3):304-14. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200003000-00002.
McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Raczek AE. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care. 1993 Mar;31(3):247-63. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199303000-00006.
Sonnabend DH, Watson EM. Structural factors affecting the outcome of rotator cuff repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002 May-Jun;11(3):212-8. doi: 10.1067/mse.2002.122272.
Stewart AL, Hays RD, Ware JE Jr. The MOS short-form general health survey. Reliability and validity in a patient population. Med Care. 1988 Jul;26(7):724-35. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198807000-00007. No abstract available.
Wolfgang GL. Surgical repair of tears of the rotator cuff of the shoulder. Factors influencing the result. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1974 Jan;56(1):14-26. No abstract available.
Iannotti JP, Bernot MP, Kuhlman JR, Kelley MJ, Williams GR. Postoperative assessment of shoulder function: a prospective study of full-thickness rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1996 Nov-Dec;5(6):449-57. doi: 10.1016/s1058-2746(96)80017-6.
Neer CS 2nd. Anterior acromioplasty for the chronic impingement syndrome in the shoulder: a preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1972 Jan;54(1):41-50. No abstract available.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
060109
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.