Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
156 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-11-25
2027-11-25
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Management of rotator cuff disorders initially involves symptomatic drug therapy (painkillers and non-steroidal anti-inflammatories), combined with rest and rehabilitation. Then, in case of insufficient improvement, subacromial steroid injection is often proposed. Despite the frequency of the condition, there are no established recommendations for the management of these patients. However, a recent study showed that the combination of posture advice and subacromial steroid injection was a more cost-effective strategy than either physiotherapy alone or infiltration alone. When we look at patients' outcome, chronic pain and impaired function are frequently seen, since 30-50% of patients still have symptoms after 1-2 years. It is therefore important to optimize the medical management of these patients, especially as at the stage of tendinopathy without rupture because surgical management is not always able to provide clinically significant benefits in terms of pain, function or quality of life.
In some chronic diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis, it has been shown that early and tight control leads to better clinical results, as treatments are regularly and closely adapted to predefined objectives (remission or low disease activity). A significant improvement was also observed in diabetic patients under tight control leading to reduction in the risk of progression of retinal and neurological complications and significantly decreased risk of cardiovascular events.
The GREAT protocol is a prospective, randomized, multicenter study comparing two groups of patients:
* In the experimental or "tight control" group, patients will be seen every month for the first 3 months of follow-up. During these consultations, shoulder pain and function will be assessed. Treatment adjustments will be proposed in line with predefined objectives.
* In the control group, patients will have the usual follow-up for this indication, i.e. a follow-up consultation 3 months after the 1st consultation with the rheumatologist to assess their clinical course.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Tight control group
Patients will be seen every month for the first 3 months of follow-up During these consultations, shoulder pain and function will be assessed. Treatment adjustments (steroid injections, drugs and physiotherapy) will be proposed in line with predefined objectives.
tight control management
Patients will be seen every month for the first 3 months of follow-up During these consultations, shoulder pain and function will be assessed. Treatment adjustments (steroid injections, drugs and physiotherapy) will be proposed in line with predefined objectives.
Control group
Patients will have the usual follow-up for this indication, i.e. a follow-up consultation 3 months after the 1st consultation with the rheumatologist to assess their clinical course.
standard follow-up
Patients are monitored according to standard practice
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
tight control management
Patients will be seen every month for the first 3 months of follow-up During these consultations, shoulder pain and function will be assessed. Treatment adjustments (steroid injections, drugs and physiotherapy) will be proposed in line with predefined objectives.
standard follow-up
Patients are monitored according to standard practice
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age between 18 and 65
* Shoulder pain on activity for less than 6 months with VAS≥4/10 and/or OSS≥20
* Pain compatible with rotator cuff tendinopathy according to the rotator cuff tendinopathy according to the BESS (British Elbow and Shoulder Society) guidelines
Exclusion Criteria
* Shoulder pain related to trauma (dislocation, fracture) or acute tendon rupture requiring short-term surgery
* Steroid injection already performed on the shoulder studied for the current episode
* Neurological pathology affecting the shoulder
* Other shoulder disorders (inflammatory arthritis, frozen shoulder, glenohumeral joint instability, pain associated with acromioclavicular arthropathy)
* Tendon calcification \> 0.5 cm.
* Previous shoulder surgery
* Full-thickness tear of one tendon
* Pregnant women
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Nantes University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CHU Angers
Angers, , France
CHU de Brest
Brest, , France
CHRU de Tours
Chambray-lès-Tours, , France
CH Cholet
Cholet, , France
CH Vendée
La Roche-sur-Yon, , France
CH du Mans
Le Mans, , France
CHU de Nantes
Nantes, , France
Chotard Emilie
Rennes, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Emmanuel Hoppe, PH
Role: primary
Anne Roudaut, PH
Role: primary
Guillermo Carvajal Alegria, PH
Role: primary
Benoît Metayer, PH
Role: primary
Céline COZIC, PH
Role: primary
Guillaume Direz, PH
Role: primary
Christelle Darrieurtort, PH
Role: primary
Emilie CHotard, PH
Role: primary
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RC23_0421
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id