Comparison of Soft Tissue Biased Manual Therapy and Conventional Physical Therapy in Patients With Frozen Shoulder
NCT ID: NCT03711409
Last Updated: 2021-09-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
34 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-12-25
2020-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Mobilization Techniques in Patients With Frozen Shoulder: a Randomized Multiple-Treatment Trial
NCT00172601
Prediction Frozen Shoulder Validation
NCT01157221
Effect of Combined Intra-articular Injection of Lidocaine Plus Physiotherapy in Treatment of Frozen Shoulder
NCT01817348
Comparing the Efficacy of KT vs DN With Conventional Treatment for Improving QOL and Alleviating Pain in Frozen Shoulder
NCT06377644
The Immediate Effects of Soft Tissue Mobilization on Posterior Shoulder Tightness in Overhead Athletes With Subacromial Pain Syndrome
NCT07005856
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The course of FS is divided into four consecutive stages which are inflammation, painful, frozen and thawing phase. Shoulder pain almost exists during the whole course of frozen shoulder. The pain and discomfort of FS patients are frequently localized to the deltoid insertion and coracoid process. Pain induces muscle spasm and causes pain-spasm-pain cycle resulting in limited range of motion, changed muscle recruitment pattern and finally influences neuromuscular control.
Commonly used conservative interventions for FS patients include joint mobilization, corticosteroid injection, exercise, modality and soft tissue mobilization. Despite joint mobilization is the most commonly used manual therapy in patients with FS, the evidence level is weak and the efficacy is not superior to other conservative treatment s. Soft tissue mobilization is widely used in lots of musculoskeletal conditions. The effects of soft tissue mobilization include breaking the adhesion tissue and improving range of motion, muscle strength and motor control. However, few studies have investigated the effect of soft tissue mobilization in patients with frozen shoulder. Only one study used one-time muscle release to FS patients and investigate improvement in shoulder biomechanics, muscle strength and ROM. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to investigate and compare the effect of soft tissue biased manual therapy and conventional physical therapy for six weeks in patients with primary FS.
The study design is a pretest-posttest control group design. The investigators plan to recruit 70 patients with primary frozen shoulder and divide them into a soft tissue biased manual therapy group and a conventional physical therapy group. The sample size is determined by the previous study. It is based on a significance level of 0.05, and a power of 0.80. The outcome measures in this study include scapula kinematics, scapula position, the range of motion, muscle tone, muscle strength, pain and functional impairment.
LIBERTY™ electromagnetic tracking system (Polhemus, Colchester, VT, USA) was used to collect three-dimensional kinematic (3D) data during scaption, hand to neck and hand to back tasks at a sampling rate of 120 Hz, and the software Motion Monitor® (Innovative Sport Training, Inc., Chicago. IL. USA) was used to analyze the data. The main measurements of shoulder kinematics include scapular upward/downward rotation, internal/external rotation, and anterior/posterior tilt. A stylus was used to digitize the bony landmarks for defining the anatomical coordinate system. The methods for this measure have been described previously.
For collecting muscle activation data, the investigators used surface electromyography (sEMG, TeleMyo 2400 G2 Telemetry; Noraxon USA, Inc., USA) to collect scapular muscles' activation during those tasks. The investigators will measure the muscle activities of the pectoralis major, upper trapezius, infraspinatus, teres major and lower trapezius. The electrodes will be placed according to previous studies and be positioned in parallel to the direction of the muscle fibers.
The range of motion of shoulder flexion, abduction, external rotation and internal rotation will be measured by plastic universal goniometer according to Norkin's methods. The muscle strength of lower trapezius, external rotators and internal rotators are measured by the hand-held dynamometer. The scapula positions are measured by modified scapular sliding test with calliper during arms by sides, hands on the hips and scaption 90 degrees. The muscle tone of pectoralis major, upper trapezius, infraspinatus and teres complex will be measured by hand-held myotonometer (Myoton-Pro, Myoton AS, Tallinn, Estonia) in shoulder resting position according to previous studies. The functional impairments are measured by Flexilevel Scale of Shoulder Function questionnaire. The pain level is measured by the visual analogue scale.
Participants in the soft tissue biased manual therapy group will receive heat and muscle release for six weeks and participants in conventional physical therapy group will receive modalities and joint mobilization for six weeks. The measurement will be obtained at baseline, 3 weeks, and after the intervention. Repeated measures ANOVA will be used for data analysis. The level of significance sets at α=0.05.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Soft tissue biased manual therapy group
It includes hot pack and muscle release technique of the muscles around the shoulder. The patient receives treatment 45 minutes per times and 2 times per week for 6 weeks.
Soft tissue biased manual therapy group
It includes hot pack and muscle release technique of pectoralis major, pectoralis minor, teres major, teres minor, infraspinatus and posterior deltoid muscles. Subjects are supine on the bed. The muscle release technique is applied at the end available range and the acceptable intensity. The time of muscle release intervention is about 30 min and hot-pack about 15 min.
Conventional physical therapy group
It includes modality (electrotherapy, ultrasound and low-level laser therapy) and GH joint mobilization. The patient receives treatment 45 minutes per times and 2 times per week for 6 weeks.
Conventional physical therapy group
It includes modality (electrotherapy, ultrasound and low-level laser therapy) and GH joint mobilization. GH joint mobilization includes anterior to posterior glide, caudal glide and distraction. The intensity of joint mobilization is grade III to IV. The time of joint mobilization is about 30 min and hot-pack for 15 min.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Soft tissue biased manual therapy group
It includes hot pack and muscle release technique of pectoralis major, pectoralis minor, teres major, teres minor, infraspinatus and posterior deltoid muscles. Subjects are supine on the bed. The muscle release technique is applied at the end available range and the acceptable intensity. The time of muscle release intervention is about 30 min and hot-pack about 15 min.
Conventional physical therapy group
It includes modality (electrotherapy, ultrasound and low-level laser therapy) and GH joint mobilization. GH joint mobilization includes anterior to posterior glide, caudal glide and distraction. The intensity of joint mobilization is grade III to IV. The time of joint mobilization is about 30 min and hot-pack for 15 min.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Reduction in range of motion in more than two planes
* \< 30 degrees of the external rotation range of motion during shoulder abduct to 90 degree
* No radiologic abnormality
* Onset time more than three months
* No night pain and resting pain
Exclusion Criteria
40 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Yi-Fen Shih
Professor, Department of Physical Therapy and Assistive Technology, National Yang-Ming University
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Shih Yi-Fen, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Department of Physical Therapy and Assistive Technology, National Yang-Ming University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
National Yang Ming University
Taipei, , Taiwan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
TCHIRB-10705119-E
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.