Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
79 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2007-04-30
2011-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Regeneten Patch vs Standard Care in Partial Thickness Rotator Cuff Repair
NCT04673344
Evaluating the Use of a Bioinductive Graft in Treating Massive Rotator Cuff Tears
NCT04248751
Clinical Study on the Safety and Efficacy of Tendon Stem Progenitor Cells Therapy for Rotator Cuff Tears
NCT07320378
Rotator Cuff Augmentation With Human Dermal Allograft Versus Bovine Collagen Xenograft Patch: A Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT06215417
Prospective Study to Determine the Safety and Effectiveness of a Connective Tissue Allograft Active Matrix (AM) vs. Standard of Care in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair
NCT05894265
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Each investigator will indicate which operative technique (mini-open or arthroscopic) will be used during the study period at their site. The site selection process will be used to attempt to attain an equal distribution of both operative techniques used in the study. Patients will be randomly assigned to the treatment groups A or B. A randomization scheme using a 2 block model will be used within each surgical technique. Randomization cards meeting the requirements for this process will be generated by the statistician. Both surgical technique treatment groups will use the same assessments for comparisons throughout the study period.
Enrollment Plan for the GraftJacket Rotator Cuff Tendon Reinforcement Scaffold Surgical Technique Open Surgical (suture and anchor) Arthroscopic Group A without augmentation Group B with GraftJacket Group A without augmentation Group B with GraftJacket
Patients with reparable rotator cuff repairs must present with large and massive rotator cuff tears of more than 3cm, which can be repaired either arthroscopically or by open surgery to be eligible for enrollment. A reparable rotator cuff tear is defined as a tear of the rotator cuff where it is possible to bring the retracted tendon edge back to the greater tuberosity of the humerus without excessive tension. It should be possible to accomplish a watertight repair or only leave a residual defect of less than or equal to 1cm. The anteroposterior and mediolateral dimensions of the rotator cuff tear will be assessed intra-operatively by measurements either including the edges or after the edges are trimmed depending on the judgment of the surgeon. Rotator cuff tears involving the subscapularis tendon will not be included in the study, because the postoperative rehabilitation is more difficult and may confound the outcome results of either group. Surgical variables that should be documented on source documents and appropriate CRFs are the size of rotator cuff tear, the number of tendons involved, the type of repair (open, mini-open, arthroscopic) and the type and number of sutures and anchors.
Both clinical assessments and magnetic resonance imaging will be used to evaluate the effectiveness of the surgical techniques in both groups A and B. A screen/baseline MRI will be obtained of the affected shoulder during the preoperative visit. This MRI will be used to evaluate the extent of involvement and determine suitability for enrollment into the study including the size of the tear and extent of muscle atrophy. Images obtained within 3 months of signing consent may be used to assess eligibility for enrollment. Three additional follow-up MRIs of the affected shoulder will be obtained as part of the 2 year post-operative evaluation and will be used to evaluate structural success of group A, suture and anchor or group B, GraftJacket® allograft augmentation. The MRI scans performed at 6 months, 12 months and 24 months will be used to determine the rate of re-tear and to help to assess the integrity of the rotator cuff. Re-tears which are evident on the 6-month MRI will be considered a failure of the surgical technique, will be excluded from further follow-up within the study and followed separately. The comparison of the proportions of re-tears in patients in groups A and B who complete the MRI regimen through 2 years will be used to determine if GraftJacket® augmentation is a viable alternative to suture and anchor.
The Investigator will use clinical, functional, radiological, assessment of adverse events and assessment of the surgical techniques of groups A or B to evaluate each patient enrolled in this clinical study.
Pre Operative Procedures - Screen (Baseline)
Screening activities are performed during Visit 1. The protocol requires the following assessments during that visit:
* Informed consent process completed before any study related activities begin
* Inclusion/Exclusion criteria evaluation for study entry qualifications
* Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
* American Shoulder and Elbow Society (ASES) Scale
* University California Los Angeles (UCLA) Score
* Constant-Murley Score (CMS) Operative Procedures
The protocol requires completion of the following assessments during Visit 2:
* Open wound evaluation of rotator cuff tear for classification as large or massive with measurement of the tear to confirm size and length
* Enrollment confirmed using WMT randomization scheme for patient assignments Post Operative Procedures
Protocol requires the following assessments to be completed during the 1 month (plus 15 days) -Visit 3; 3 month (plus 15 days)-Visit 4; 6 month (plus 30 days) -Visit 5 and 12 month (plus 30 days) -Visit 6:
* MRI - Only performed during the 6 month (plus 30 day)-Visit 5 and 12 month (plus 30 days) -Visit 6
* ASES Scale
* CMS
* UCLA Score End of Study
Protocol requires completion of the following assessments during 24 month (plus 30 days)-Visit 7:
* MRI
* ASES Scale
* CMS
* UCLA Score
* Completion of End of Study Evaluation Form by the Principal Investigator
4.7 Scientific validity of the study design: Address the strengths and weaknesses of the selected design. Specifically indicate why a particular design was selected.
(1 page maximum - adhere to page limitations) Strengths: Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial Weakness: While not a true weakness, this trial is not randomized in the regular way but is using the "Expertise Randomization" style where the surgeon chooses his particular expertise of surgical repair of the rotator cuff (mini-open or arthroscopic) and the patients are randomized within that group.
A telephone randomization scheme cannot be used so there will be envelopes available to the surgeon in the OR for the group.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Augmentation
Rotator Cuff Repair augmented with the Graft Jacket Device
Augmentation
Rotator Cuff Repair plus Graft Jacket
No Augmentation
Rotator Cuff RFepair
Augmentation
Rotator Cuff Repair plus Graft Jacket
Rotator Cuff Repair without augmentation
Rotator Cuff Repair without augmentation
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Augmentation
Rotator Cuff Repair plus Graft Jacket
Rotator Cuff Repair without augmentation
Rotator Cuff Repair without augmentation
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Reads, understand and able to complete the patient reported outcomes in English,
3. Patients with large and massive rotator cuff tears of more than 3cm, which can be repaired either arthroscopically or by open surgery.,
4. Patients with either primary or revision rotator cuff tears measuring \< 5cm with at least 2 tendon involvement as indicated by MRI,
5. Patients who have a reasonable movement of the non-operative arm, defined as a shoulder elevation of equal or more than 90°, and are able to perform (postoperative) exercises,
6. Patients for whom there is a reasonable expectation that he or she will be available for each protocol required post-operative follow-up examination,
7. Patients must complete the informed consent process (including any regulatory requirements such as HIPAA authorization) agreeing to participate and signing the informed consent form prior to the site conducting any study related procedures.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patients with rotator cuff tears where the subscapularis tendon is disrupted,
3. Patients with inflammatory or auto-immune based joint diseases (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus),
4. Patients with evidence of active infection, cancer, or highly communicable diseases that would preclude the patient from completing required patient assessments and clinic visits as described in the protocol,
5. Patients who smoke,
6. Patients with a documented history of drug abuse within six months of treatment,
7. Any other condition, that in the opinion of the investigator, that would preclude the patient from enrollment.
8. Females of child-bearing potential who are pregnant or breastfeeding, or plan to become pregnant during the course of the study
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sports Medicine & Arthroscopic Surgery Bone & Joint Clinic of Houston
UNKNOWN
Southern California Orthopedic Institute Medical Group
UNKNOWN
Kelsey-Seybold Clinic
OTHER
Plano Orthopedic & Sports Medicine Center
UNKNOWN
St Joseph's Hospital Hand & Upper Limb Center
UNKNOWN
Fowler Kennedy Sport Medicine Clinic
OTHER
St. Boniface Hospital
OTHER
Stryker Trauma and Extremities
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Robert Litchfield, MD, FRCSC
Study Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Robert Litchfield, MD, FRCSC
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Fowler Kennedy Sport Medicine Clinic
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Southern California Orthopedic Institute
Simi Valley, California, United States
Bone and Joint Clinic of Houston
Houston, Texas, United States
Kelsey-Seybold Orthopedic
Houston, Texas, United States
Plano Orthopedic & Sports Medicine
Plano, Texas, United States
Pan Am Clinic
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Fowler Kennedy Sport Medicine Clinic
London, Ontario, Canada
The Hand and Upper Limb Centre
London, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Wright1
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.