From Rotator Cuff Repair to Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty - Clinical and Radiological Results
NCT ID: NCT06644729
Last Updated: 2024-10-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
733 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-09-11
2025-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Shoulder pain is a common problem in the Norwegian population. Rotator cuff tear is a major cause of shoulder pain with a reported prevalence of up to 51% in patients 60-80 years of age. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is performed in an increasing proportion of these patients. Good results in shoulder function has been reported, although there is a lack in published good quality studies and long term follow up of these patients. There is also a lack of evidence regarding the association between radiologically-verified re-tear and clinical outcome.
In this project, the investigators address these critical gaps in knowledge and aim to investigate the factors influencing the clinical outcome after rotator cuff surgery and re-tear in a large prospective cohort study. The investigators will investigate how many participants suffering from poor outcome and develop cuff arthropathy in need of reverse shoulder arthroplasty after 10 years.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Clinical and Structural Outcome After Early Repair of the Traumatic Rotator Cuff Tear
NCT01557309
Outcomes of Massive Rotator Cuff Tendon Tear Treatment.
NCT06016439
Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty vs Rotator Cuff Repair for 60+
NCT06848023
Arthroscopic Superior Capsular Reconstruction - Study of Different Types of Grafts
NCT03739749
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Tear Repair: Single Versus Double Layer Fixation
NCT03362320
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The main objective is to quantify the relative importance of preoperative and perioperative prognostic factors on functional outcomes ten years after rotator cuff repair. The secondary objective is to identify and quantify patients who need shoulder replacement surgery ten years after rotator cuff surgery as a measure of failure.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Cohort 10 years after surgery
Cohort of 733 participants will be invited to a 10 year follow up and will be evaluated with patient reported outcome measurements and x-ray.
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Included in the rotator cuff registry at Lovisenberg Diaconal Hospital
* Able to read and write Norwegian
Exclusion Criteria
* Not able to submit patient reported outcome measurements in any way and not able to undergo x-ray
* Patient is unwilling to participate
18 Years
95 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sykehuset Telemark
OTHER_GOV
South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority
OTHER
Lovisenberg Diakonale Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Kjersti Kaul Jenssen
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Kjersti Kaul Jenssen, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Lovisenberg Diaconal Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Lovisenberg Diacolan Hospital
Oslo, , Norway
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CARS3
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.