Self-locking Tenodesis of the Long Chief of the Biceps Vs. Lasso 360 Tenodesis in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Rotator Cuff Repair

NCT ID: NCT06774820

Last Updated: 2025-02-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-01-22

Study Completion Date

2028-01-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study is to compare the clinical results and complications of self-locking biceps tenodesis and double 360 lasso loop biceps tenodesis for the treatment of long chief of biceps or superior labrum anterior-posterior (SLAP) tendon pathology during shoulder arthroscopy in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Currently, there is no consensus on the use of tenodesis versus tenotomy to treat pathology of the long head of the biceps during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Numerous studies have examined the clinical results of long biceps tenotomy versus long biceps tenodesis, and there is no evidence to date of superiority of either technique. At Clinique Générale, we use a new, innovative technique called autobloc tenodesis to treat pathologies of the long head of the biceps. There are no comparative studies between autobloc tenodesis of the biceps and biceps tenodesis. Given its potential advantages, self-locking biceps tenodesis could emerge as the new technique of choice for treating biceps longus tendon pathology, potentially reducing differences in outcomes such as Popeye deformity. The information provided by this study could potentially guide future clinical practice, helping surgeons to choose the most appropriate treatment for their patients suffering from long biceps tendon pathology.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Rotator Cuff Injury

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

self-blocking tenodesis

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

self-blocking tenodesis

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

the LHB tendon is detached from its origin in the superior labrum. This technique supports the self-locking mechanism of the LHB tendon in the bicipital groove by detaching the tendon from the Y-shaped superior glenoid, including the superior labrum. A radiographically visible suture will be attached to the proximal part of the LHB tendon to facilitate later localization of the LHB tendon during imaging (3-0 stainless steel, ethicon).

arthroscopic tenodesis

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

arthroscopic tenodesis

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

LHB tendon is detached from its origin, and sutured. Next, the LHB tendon is fixed in the bicipital groove using a 360-lasso loop tenodesis technique. A radiographically visible suture will be attached to the proximal part of the LHB tendon to facilitate subsequent localization of the LHB tendon during imaging (3-0 stainless steel, ethicon).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

self-blocking tenodesis

the LHB tendon is detached from its origin in the superior labrum. This technique supports the self-locking mechanism of the LHB tendon in the bicipital groove by detaching the tendon from the Y-shaped superior glenoid, including the superior labrum. A radiographically visible suture will be attached to the proximal part of the LHB tendon to facilitate later localization of the LHB tendon during imaging (3-0 stainless steel, ethicon).

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

arthroscopic tenodesis

LHB tendon is detached from its origin, and sutured. Next, the LHB tendon is fixed in the bicipital groove using a 360-lasso loop tenodesis technique. A radiographically visible suture will be attached to the proximal part of the LHB tendon to facilitate subsequent localization of the LHB tendon during imaging (3-0 stainless steel, ethicon).

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Full-thickness rotator cuff tear of the supraspinatus/infraspinatus tendon, diagnosed preoperatively by ultrasound, arthro-CT or MRI.
* Patients must be able to read and write in French in order to complete the questionnaires and sign the informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria

* Partial rotator cuff tear
* Massive and irreparable rotator cuff tear
* Grade 4 according to Goutallier classification of fatty degeneration of rotator cuff muscles
* Rupture of the long biceps
* Hourglass deformity of biceps tendon origin
* Osteoarthritis of the glenohumeral joint, defined by narrowing of the glenohumeral joint space or osteophytes, using AP radiography of the affected shoulder.
* Distance between acromion and humeral head measuring 6 mm or less, defined by Hamada classification as grade 2 or higher.
* Previous shoulder surgery.
* Dementia or inability to complete questionnaires and assessments.
* Pregnant, parturient or breast-feeding patients.
* Persons under legal protection (curatorship, guardianship, safeguard of justice).
* Persons deprived of their liberty by judicial or administrative measure
* Persons under psychiatric care
* Persons not affiliated to a social security scheme
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Clinique Générale dAnnecy

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Clinique Générale

Annecy, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Geert Alexander Buijze, MD

Role: CONTACT

+33 6 69 96 27 33

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2024-45-CGA

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Biceps Tenodesis Versus Tenotomy
NCT01747902 COMPLETED NA