Outcomes of Biceps Tenodesis or Labral Repair for Treatment of Type 2 Superior Labrum Anterior and Posterior Lesions

NCT ID: NCT02107547

Last Updated: 2023-04-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-05-23

Study Completion Date

2017-04-11

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of the study is to determine which of the two alternative surgical interventions (biceps tenodesis or labrum repair surgery) is better in the treatment of Type 2 Superior Labrum Anterior and Posterior lesions.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The labrum is a structure which provides stability to the shoulder joint. A superior labral tear from anterior to posterior lesion is an injury to the labrum at the insertion of the biceps muscle. The grading system is related to the severity of the tear. A type 2 tear is an intermediate grade tear. These are commonly treated in two ways: either by repairing the labrum with bone anchors or by cutting the biceps tendon and re-affixing it more distally. No method has been shown to be superior to the other and surgeons generally choose to proceed however they are most comfortable. The study will seek to determine how these injuries are best treated. Inclusion criteria: patients with type 2 superior labral tear from anterior to posterior tears who are under the age of 45. Throwing athletes are excluded due to their unique demands.

Subjects will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. Prior to surgery patients will be evaluated in clinic, full histories and physicals will be performed and their functional status will be evaluated using validated questionnaires including the American Shoulder and Elbow Society score and quality of life measurements.

Both groups will be treated first with a shoulder arthroscopy. The experimental portion of the study will involve whether the patient is then treated with repair of the Superior Labrum Anterior and Posterior lesion or with tenodesis. Repair of a Superior Labrum Anterior and Posterior lesion involves placing small anchors in the glenoid to re-attach the torn labrum. A biceps tenodesis involves cutting the tendon within the shoulder joint and reattached further down the arm. Physical therapy will be initiated after surgery and will be identical in both groups. It will be recommended but not required as part of the study. Progress notes, operative reports, and questionnaires will also be retained as part of the study. Patients will be in a sling for the first 4 weeks after surgery. Post-operatively, physical examinations findings and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores at 3, 6, and 12 months. These will be compared to the preoperative results and to the other experimental arm of the study. Post-operative imaging will not be obtained. No computerized tomographies will be required as part of the study. No Magnetic Resonance Imagings will be required as part of the study--patients enrolled in the study will likely have had an MRI performed outside of the study period to determine if they have an isolated Superior Labrum Anterior and Posterior tear but no MRIs will be performed as part of the study. No lab reports or Physical therapy reports will be included in the study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Type 2 SLAP Lesions

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Biceps tenodesis

32 subjects in the study will receive biceps tenodesis as a surgical intervention

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Biceps tenodesis

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

A biceps tenodesis involves cutting the tendon within the shoulder joint and reattached further down the arm.

Labral repair

32 subjects in the study will receive labral repair as a surgical intervention

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Labral repair

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Repair of a Superior Labrum Anterior and Posterior lesion involves placing small anchors in the glenoid to re-attach the torn labrum.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Biceps tenodesis

A biceps tenodesis involves cutting the tendon within the shoulder joint and reattached further down the arm.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Labral repair

Repair of a Superior Labrum Anterior and Posterior lesion involves placing small anchors in the glenoid to re-attach the torn labrum.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patients with MRI diagnosed Superior Labrum Anterior and Posterior 2 lesion

Exclusion Criteria

* none
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Chicago

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Lewis L Shi, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Chicago

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The University of Chicago Medical Center

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRB 13-0085

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Biceps Tenodesis Versus Tenotomy
NCT01747902 COMPLETED NA
Tuberoplasty Versus Balloon Spacer
NCT06735170 RECRUITING PHASE1/PHASE2