Impact of Humeral Component Version on Outcomes Following RTSA

NCT ID: NCT03111147

Last Updated: 2024-03-05

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

95 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-05-12

Study Completion Date

2023-05-23

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The proposed study is a prospective, single-blinded, randomized trial to investigate the impact of humeral component version on shoulder range of motion and patient reported functional outcomes following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Retrospective clinical evidence suggests that increasing humeral component retroversion does not affect measured internal or external rotation, however patients with neutral version may experience better function with daily activities requiring internal rotation compared to those with 30 degrees of retroversion. Prospective data on clinical outcomes comparing different humeral component versions in RTSA is currently lacking. The proposed study is a prospective, single-blinded, randomized trial to investigate the impact of humeral component version on shoulder range of motion and patient reported functional outcomes following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Rotator Cuff Tear Arthropathy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

0 degrees humeral component version

Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty with humeral component positioned in 0 degrees of version

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

0 degrees humeral component version

Intervention Type DEVICE

RTSA with humeral component positioned in 0 degrees of version

30 degrees humeral component retroversion

Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty with humeral component positioned in 30 degrees of retroversion

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

30 degrees humeral component retroversion

Intervention Type DEVICE

RTSA with humeral component positioned in 30 degrees of retroversion

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

0 degrees humeral component version

RTSA with humeral component positioned in 0 degrees of version

Intervention Type DEVICE

30 degrees humeral component retroversion

RTSA with humeral component positioned in 30 degrees of retroversion

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients undergoing primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
* Diagnosis of cuff tear arthropathy or primary OA with RCT
* Intact posterior rotator cuff and subscapularis preoperatively, as determined by surgeon-administered physical exam
* 18 years or older

Exclusion Criteria

* Revision arthroplasty
* Diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis, infection, acute trauma or instability
* Minors (under 18 years of age)

* Prior open shoulder surgery
* Concomitant latissimus dorsi transfer
* Patients not undergoing a standard of care physical therapy protocol
* Pregnant, patient-reported
* Cognitively impaired
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

William Beaumont Hospitals

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Michael Wiater

◾Vice Chairman Orthopedic Surgery◾Chief of Shoulder Surgery ◾Program Director, Fellowship in Shoulder and Elbow Surgery ◾Program Director, Orthopaedic Surgery Residency

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

J. Michael Wiater, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

William Beaumont Hospitals

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Beaumont Health

Royal Oak, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2017-057

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Fixed Inclination Humeral Cut
NCT03922763 UNKNOWN NA