TSA vs RSA in Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis

NCT ID: NCT04228419

Last Updated: 2025-03-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

108 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-03-09

Study Completion Date

2032-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will compare total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) procedures, in the context of a prospective, randomized-controlled trial to determine the optimal treatment in patients 65 years of age and older, and equal to or less than 15 degrees of glenoid retroversion, who have glenohumeral osteoarthritis.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Osteoarthritis (OA) of the shoulder is a disease resulting from the wearing down of cartilage over time. OA can be the cause of pain and dysfunction and is a growing occurrence in the investigator's aging population. TSA or RSA are common surgical procedures used to treat patients with shoulder OA. TSA is able to keep the "natural anatomy" of the shoulder and involves replacing the worn-out ball and socket shoulder joint with prosthetic components. TSA is performed today with high success rates, however, complication rates associated with TSA remain prevalent, particularly when the arthritis is associated with bone erosion on the glenoid (socket).

RSA is an alternative surgical procedure commonly used and involves replacing and reversing the ball and the socket (i.e. opposite of TSA). RSA is typically performed in patients with a rotator cuff deficiency and more severe OA. Though RSA procedures show marked increase in clinical and functional outcomes, evidence of its long-term results are sparse, and as such is typically reserved for when treating an older patient population.

Few research studies have compared these different surgical techniques to one another, in the older patient population.

This research will provide surgeons with new information regarding the best treatment for patients in this population.

This Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) will compare TSA and RSA procedures in those 65 years of age and older, who have equal to or less than 15 degrees of glenoid retroversion, in an effort to determine which approach produces better functional outcomes and improved quality of life in this patient population.

Primary Objective: Determine the difference in disease specific quality of life between patients diagnosed with glenohumeral OA who undergo either a TSA or RSA as measured by the Western Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder (WOOS) score at 24-months and 5-years post-operative.

Secondary Objectives: i) Determine the difference in disease specific quality of life between patients diagnosed with a glenohumeral osteoarthritis who undergo a shoulder replacement with RSA or TSA as measured by the Constant score, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment form (ASES), the EuroQol Group EQ-5D-5L score, pain (using a Visual Analog Scale), and Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV) at 24-months and 5-years post-operative as well as adverse events, and health care utilization.

ii) To determine the survivorship of the components as measured by the degree of radiographic lucencies and component alignment determined by a CT scan at 1- and 5-years post-surgery.

Clinical Relevance: Shoulder OA results in pain and dysfunction, which negatively impacts quality of life. As such, determination of superior treatment approach will lead to significant improvement in quality of life, and cost savings through avoidance of recurrence and/or reoperation, as well as decreased morbidity for patients in this population.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Total Shoulder Arthroplasty (anatomic)

TSA procedure involves replacing the worn-out ball and socket joint with prosthetic components.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Replacement of the shoulder joint (ball and socket, or humeral head and glenoid) using prosthetic components.

Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty

RSA procedure is similar to a TSA, however the orientation of the ball and socket joint is placed in the reverse position

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Replacement of the shoulder joint like the TSA, however the orientation of the ball and socket is reversed.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Replacement of the shoulder joint (ball and socket, or humeral head and glenoid) using prosthetic components.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty

Replacement of the shoulder joint like the TSA, however the orientation of the ball and socket is reversed.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients who have failed standard non-surgical management of their idiopathic shoulder osteoarthritis who would benefit from a shoulder arthroplasty. Failed medical management will be defined as persistent pain and disability despite adequate standard non-operative management for 6 months. Medical management will be defined as:

1. The use of drugs including analgesics and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
2. Physiotherapy consisting of stretching, strengthening and local modalities (ultrasound, cryotherapy, etc.)
3. Activity modification
2. Imaging, and intra-operative findings confirming advanced glenohumeral cartilage loss
3. Patients may present with a glenoid deficiency and \</=15 degrees of retroversion
4. 65 years of age and older

Exclusion Criteria

1. Active joint or systemic infection
2. Rotator cuff arthropathy
3. Significant muscle paralysis
4. Charcot's arthropathy
5. Major medical illness (life expectancy less than 1 year or unacceptably high operative risk)
6. Unable to understand the consent form/process
7. Pregnancy
8. Psychiatric illness that precludes informed consent
9. Unwilling to be followed for the duration of the study
10. Retroversion cannot be surgically corrected to within 10 degrees of neutral
11. History of previous shoulder surgery on affected side
Minimum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Peter Lapner, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The Ottawa Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Alberta

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Pan Am Clinic Foundation

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Kingston General Hospital (Site-Watkins 3)

Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Site Status RECRUITING

The Ottawa Hospital

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Peter Lapner Lapner, MD

Role: CONTACT

613-737-8899 ext. 78377

Katie McIlquham

Role: CONTACT

613-737-8899 ext. 79839

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Martin Bouliane, MD

Role: primary

780-434-4859

Sheila McRae

Role: primary

204-925-7469

Fiona Howells

Role: primary

613-549-6666 ext. 4348

Peter Lapner, MD

Role: primary

6137378899 ext. 78377

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

20190674-01H

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Rotator Cuff Sparing Total Arthroplasty
NCT01961986 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
RSA Vs RCR for Massive RCTs
NCT05807854 RECRUITING NA