Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
108 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-03-09
2032-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
TSA v RSA in Osteoarthritic Shoulders With Greater Than 15 Degrees of Retroversion
NCT05487274
Clinical Evaluation of Reverse Versus Anatomic Shoulder Arthroplasty Techniques in the Treatment of Osteoarthritis
NCT05395819
TSA Techniques in Glenohumeral OA
NCT02966886
TSA Versus RSA in Patients >75
NCT04827277
Anatomic Versus Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Primary Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis
NCT06513559
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
RSA is an alternative surgical procedure commonly used and involves replacing and reversing the ball and the socket (i.e. opposite of TSA). RSA is typically performed in patients with a rotator cuff deficiency and more severe OA. Though RSA procedures show marked increase in clinical and functional outcomes, evidence of its long-term results are sparse, and as such is typically reserved for when treating an older patient population.
Few research studies have compared these different surgical techniques to one another, in the older patient population.
This research will provide surgeons with new information regarding the best treatment for patients in this population.
This Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) will compare TSA and RSA procedures in those 65 years of age and older, who have equal to or less than 15 degrees of glenoid retroversion, in an effort to determine which approach produces better functional outcomes and improved quality of life in this patient population.
Primary Objective: Determine the difference in disease specific quality of life between patients diagnosed with glenohumeral OA who undergo either a TSA or RSA as measured by the Western Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder (WOOS) score at 24-months and 5-years post-operative.
Secondary Objectives: i) Determine the difference in disease specific quality of life between patients diagnosed with a glenohumeral osteoarthritis who undergo a shoulder replacement with RSA or TSA as measured by the Constant score, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment form (ASES), the EuroQol Group EQ-5D-5L score, pain (using a Visual Analog Scale), and Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV) at 24-months and 5-years post-operative as well as adverse events, and health care utilization.
ii) To determine the survivorship of the components as measured by the degree of radiographic lucencies and component alignment determined by a CT scan at 1- and 5-years post-surgery.
Clinical Relevance: Shoulder OA results in pain and dysfunction, which negatively impacts quality of life. As such, determination of superior treatment approach will lead to significant improvement in quality of life, and cost savings through avoidance of recurrence and/or reoperation, as well as decreased morbidity for patients in this population.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Total Shoulder Arthroplasty (anatomic)
TSA procedure involves replacing the worn-out ball and socket joint with prosthetic components.
Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
Replacement of the shoulder joint (ball and socket, or humeral head and glenoid) using prosthetic components.
Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty
RSA procedure is similar to a TSA, however the orientation of the ball and socket joint is placed in the reverse position
Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty
Replacement of the shoulder joint like the TSA, however the orientation of the ball and socket is reversed.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
Replacement of the shoulder joint (ball and socket, or humeral head and glenoid) using prosthetic components.
Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty
Replacement of the shoulder joint like the TSA, however the orientation of the ball and socket is reversed.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. The use of drugs including analgesics and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
2. Physiotherapy consisting of stretching, strengthening and local modalities (ultrasound, cryotherapy, etc.)
3. Activity modification
2. Imaging, and intra-operative findings confirming advanced glenohumeral cartilage loss
3. Patients may present with a glenoid deficiency and \</=15 degrees of retroversion
4. 65 years of age and older
Exclusion Criteria
2. Rotator cuff arthropathy
3. Significant muscle paralysis
4. Charcot's arthropathy
5. Major medical illness (life expectancy less than 1 year or unacceptably high operative risk)
6. Unable to understand the consent form/process
7. Pregnancy
8. Psychiatric illness that precludes informed consent
9. Unwilling to be followed for the duration of the study
10. Retroversion cannot be surgically corrected to within 10 degrees of neutral
11. History of previous shoulder surgery on affected side
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Peter Lapner, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The Ottawa Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Alberta
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Pan Am Clinic Foundation
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Kingston General Hospital (Site-Watkins 3)
Kingston, Ontario, Canada
The Ottawa Hospital
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Martin Bouliane, MD
Role: primary
Sheila McRae
Role: primary
Peter Lapner, MD
Role: primary
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
20190674-01H
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.