Impact of Glenosphere Size on Range of Motion in Female Patients Undergoing Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty

NCT ID: NCT04093804

Last Updated: 2019-09-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-10-01

Study Completion Date

2024-09-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to perform a prospective randomized trial among female patients undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) to determine if a larger glenosphere allows greater range of motion without an impact on complications.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A current research debate is whether glenosphere size has a significant clinical impact on a patient's range of motion (ROM) following RSA. Some researchers have shown an association between increased glenosphere size and improved ROM, but no study has determined the absolute minimal motion differences that would be recognizable or beneficial by patients. This is mostly attributable to limitations such as small sample sizes as well as the fact that shoulder dynamics are multifactorial in nature. Most studies have shown an increased ROM with larger glenosphere sizes.1 Because smaller patients are often times female and receive smaller implants, female patients may be more susceptible to limited ROM. The purpose of this study is to determine if a larger glenosphere allows for greater ROM in female patients undergoing RSA.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Rotator Cuff Tear Arthropathy Massive Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tear

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

This study is a randomized trial consisting of female patients undergoing reverse shoulder arthroplasty for rotator cuff tear arthropathy or a massive irreparable rotator cuff tear. The experimental group will receive a 36mm glenosphere and the control group will receive the standard 32mm glenosphere. All other conditions of the surgical procedure will be identical as well as the clinical follow-up.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

32mm Glenosphere

The control group will receive the standard 32mm glenosphere.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Glenosphere size for Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty

Intervention Type DEVICE

Two randomized study groups will be formed with the consented patients (experimental and control). All patients will undergo reverse shoulder arthroplasty by the Principal Investigator. The experimental group patients will receive a 36mm glenosphere and the control group will receive a 32mm glenosphere. All other procedures during the surgery are identical between groups.

36mm Glenosphere

The experimental group will receive a 36mm glenosphere.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Glenosphere size for Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty

Intervention Type DEVICE

Two randomized study groups will be formed with the consented patients (experimental and control). All patients will undergo reverse shoulder arthroplasty by the Principal Investigator. The experimental group patients will receive a 36mm glenosphere and the control group will receive a 32mm glenosphere. All other procedures during the surgery are identical between groups.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Glenosphere size for Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty

Two randomized study groups will be formed with the consented patients (experimental and control). All patients will undergo reverse shoulder arthroplasty by the Principal Investigator. The experimental group patients will receive a 36mm glenosphere and the control group will receive a 32mm glenosphere. All other procedures during the surgery are identical between groups.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Female sex
* Diagnosis of rotator cuff tear arthropathy or a massive irreparable rotator cuff tear for which the patient has elected to undergo reverse shoulder arthroplasty
* No history of prior shoulder arthroplasty
* Consent to study participation by signing the informed consent and the Protected Health Information (PHI) form (Attachment B and C)
* Ability to speak, read and write English

Exclusion Criteria

* Male sex
* Any impairment that would prevent answering the surveys
* No children or adolescents under the age of 18 years old
* No prisoners, pregnant women, or mentally disabled persons
* No Workers' Compensation cases
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Fondren Orthopedic Group L.L.P.

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Fondren Orthopedic Group, L.L.P.

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Mitzi S Laughlin, PhD

Role: CONTACT

713-794-3408

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Mollon B, Mahure SA, Roche CP, Zuckerman JD. Impact of glenosphere size on clinical outcomes after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: an analysis of 297 shoulders. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 May;25(5):763-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.10.027. Epub 2016 Feb 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26853756 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

TOH183

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Rotator Cuff Sparing Total Arthroplasty
NCT01961986 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA