Effect of Self-regulated Learning on Academic Performance Among Physical Education Students
NCT ID: NCT06608524
Last Updated: 2024-09-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
NA
80 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-10-01
2025-01-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
According to the existing literature and many studies, self-regulated learning is an advanced form of metacognitive learning (Pintrich, 2004). It helps cultivate students\' independent learning ability and can improve their theoretical academic performance. This study attempts to use self-regulated learning in physical education theory classes to examine whether this method can enhance physical education students' theoretical academic performance.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Sport Education on Physical Fitness and Learning Attitude Among Junior High School Students
NCT06322459
Effect of Extra-curricular Sports Activities After School on Primary School Children's Academic Performance
NCT04587765
Intervention in Habit, Automatic Affective Evaluations and Physical Activity Among University Students
NCT06140680
Effect of Microteaching Training on the Teaching Skills Level of University Students
NCT06067282
Effect of Sport Education in University Required PE on Students' Perceived Physical Literacy and Physical Activity Level
NCT03888885
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Experimental group
The experimental group used self-regulated learning strategy to improve academic performance of physical education students in China.
Self-regulated learning strategy
The experimental group uses self-regulated strategy.This program selects classroom performance , homework quality , experimental operation, and test score as academic performance (score) evaluation variables.
Control group
The control group used standard learning method to improve physical education academic performance.
Standard learming method
The control group uses standard learming method. The program selects classroom performance, homework quality, experimental operation, and test score evaluation form as academic performance (score) evaluation variables.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Self-regulated learning strategy
The experimental group uses self-regulated strategy.This program selects classroom performance , homework quality , experimental operation, and test score as academic performance (score) evaluation variables.
Standard learming method
The control group uses standard learming method. The program selects classroom performance, homework quality, experimental operation, and test score evaluation form as academic performance (score) evaluation variables.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Major in Physical Education;
3. Health;
4. Able to attend all evaluation;
5. Understand the study purposes and procedures;
6. No previous experience performing self-regulated learning strategy.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Exclude participants who have not finished all evaluation;
3. Not understanding the study purposes and procedures;
4. Participants with an experience in self-regulated learning strategy.
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
XIE HUIJUAN
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
XIE HUIJUAN
Principal Investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Yuncheng University
Yuncheng, Shanxi, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
1.Davis, L. L. (1992). Instrument review: Getting the most from a panel of experts. Applied nursing research, 5(4), 194-197. 2.Goudas, M., Dermitzaki, I., & Kolovelonis, A. (2017) Self-regulated learning and students' metacognitive feelings in physical education. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 15(2), 131-145. 3. John Sproule(2017). Physical education in Taiwan: when students begin to take control. International Sport Studies, 39(1): 1-18. 4. Pintrich PR(2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review 16(4): 385-407. 5. Rosenkranz, R. R., Lubans, D. R., Peralta, L. R., Bennie, A., Sanders, T., & Lonsdale, C. (2012). A cluster randomized controlled trial of strategies to increase adolescents' physical activity and motivation during physical education lessons: The motivating active learning in physical education (MALP) trial. BMC Public Health, 12, 834. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-12-834 6. Zamanzadeh, V., Ghahramanian, A., Rassouli, M., Abbaszadeh, A., Alavi-Majd, H., & Nikanfar, A. R. (2015). Design and implementation content validity study: development of an instrument for measuring patient-centered communication. Journal of caring sciences, 4(2), 165. 7. Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 3-17. 8. Zimmerman, B. J. 2000. "Attaining Self-Regulation: A Social-Cognitive Perspective." In Boekaerts, M., Pintrich P., and Zeidner M. (Eds.), Self-regulation: Theory, Research, and Applications, Academic, Orlando, FL: 13-39. 9. Zimmerman, B. J. (2001). Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview and analysis. In B. J. Zimmerman, & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 1-37). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
KL202403
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.