Effect of Self-regulated Learning on Academic Performance Among Physical Education Students

NCT ID: NCT06608524

Last Updated: 2024-09-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

80 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-10-01

Study Completion Date

2025-01-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Difficulty in employment for college students is a serious social problem in China. All qualification examinations, further education and jobs require written theory tests. Many students are affected by their examinations, additional studies, and employment due to poor academic performance and insufficient learning ability. College students majoring in physical education generally perform better in motor technical skills but often encounter difficulties in theoretical learning.

According to the existing literature and many studies, self-regulated learning is an advanced form of metacognitive learning (Pintrich, 2004). It helps cultivate students\' independent learning ability and can improve their theoretical academic performance. This study attempts to use self-regulated learning in physical education theory classes to examine whether this method can enhance physical education students' theoretical academic performance.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In this study, the experimental group received a 12-week (John, 2017) self-regulated learning strategy based on a learning model teaching intervention designed for this study. In contrast, the control group discussed and studied traditional learning content for 12 weeks with the teacher, and the students in the experimental group learned the self-regulated learning strategy. A cluster-randomised controlled trial (CRCT) design was used, and the experimental and control groups were randomly assigned to two schools. After 12 weeks of learning, both groups were required to conduct a learning performance assessment.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Academic Performance

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

In this experiment, the experimental group will use self-regulated learning strategy, and the control group will use standard learning method. Each parallel group has 40 physical education stuednts.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
single

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Experimental group

The experimental group used self-regulated learning strategy to improve academic performance of physical education students in China.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Self-regulated learning strategy

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The experimental group uses self-regulated strategy.This program selects classroom performance , homework quality , experimental operation, and test score as academic performance (score) evaluation variables.

Control group

The control group used standard learning method to improve physical education academic performance.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Standard learming method

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The control group uses standard learming method. The program selects classroom performance, homework quality, experimental operation, and test score evaluation form as academic performance (score) evaluation variables.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Self-regulated learning strategy

The experimental group uses self-regulated strategy.This program selects classroom performance , homework quality , experimental operation, and test score as academic performance (score) evaluation variables.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Standard learming method

The control group uses standard learming method. The program selects classroom performance, homework quality, experimental operation, and test score evaluation form as academic performance (score) evaluation variables.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. University students;
2. Major in Physical Education;
3. Health;
4. Able to attend all evaluation;
5. Understand the study purposes and procedures;
6. No previous experience performing self-regulated learning strategy.

Exclusion Criteria

1. University students not majoring in Physical Education;
2. Exclude participants who have not finished all evaluation;
3. Not understanding the study purposes and procedures;
4. Participants with an experience in self-regulated learning strategy.
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

XIE HUIJUAN

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

XIE HUIJUAN

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Yuncheng University

Yuncheng, Shanxi, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

1.Davis, L. L. (1992). Instrument review: Getting the most from a panel of experts. Applied nursing research, 5(4), 194-197. 2.Goudas, M., Dermitzaki, I., & Kolovelonis, A. (2017) Self-regulated learning and students' metacognitive feelings in physical education. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 15(2), 131-145. 3. John Sproule(2017). Physical education in Taiwan: when students begin to take control. International Sport Studies, 39(1): 1-18. 4. Pintrich PR(2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review 16(4): 385-407. 5. Rosenkranz, R. R., Lubans, D. R., Peralta, L. R., Bennie, A., Sanders, T., & Lonsdale, C. (2012). A cluster randomized controlled trial of strategies to increase adolescents' physical activity and motivation during physical education lessons: The motivating active learning in physical education (MALP) trial. BMC Public Health, 12, 834. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-12-834 6. Zamanzadeh, V., Ghahramanian, A., Rassouli, M., Abbaszadeh, A., Alavi-Majd, H., & Nikanfar, A. R. (2015). Design and implementation content validity study: development of an instrument for measuring patient-centered communication. Journal of caring sciences, 4(2), 165. 7. Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 3-17. 8. Zimmerman, B. J. 2000. "Attaining Self-Regulation: A Social-Cognitive Perspective." In Boekaerts, M., Pintrich P., and Zeidner M. (Eds.), Self-regulation: Theory, Research, and Applications, Academic, Orlando, FL: 13-39. 9. Zimmerman, B. J. (2001). Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview and analysis. In B. J. Zimmerman, & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 1-37). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

KL202403

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Sustaining Quality Physical Education for Healthy Kids
NCT07227935 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA