Effect of a School Intervention With Physical Activity on Executive Functions
NCT ID: NCT06496503
Last Updated: 2025-05-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-09-02
2025-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effects of a Fifteen-minute Functional Exercise Intervention on Levels of Physical Fitness of Schoolchildren
NCT05879900
Influence of Preschool Children's Fundamental Movement Skills, Physical Activity, and Physical Fitness on Executive Function: A Prospective Observation Study
NCT05290584
Classroom Break, Cognition, and Fitness in Elementary School Children
NCT06258941
Exercise Effects on Cognition in School-Aged Children
NCT01334359
The Movement Program for an Active and Healthy Lifestyle in Adolescents
NCT02944318
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Experimental group
The children included in the experimental group will undergo 12 weeks of physical activity sessions, and it is mandatory that all children complete a minimum of two weekly sessions of physical activity for 50-60 minutes. The activities will consist of content such as motor and cognitive games, sports, dance, and gymnastics. The intensity of the sessions will be checked using accelerometry. The physical activity protocol is adapted from a previously described protocol (CMSP, 2021; Klem, Filha, Monteiro, 2017; Mazzoccante et al.; 2020; Paiano, 2019; Rodrigues, 2018; Rosini et al., 2014). Acceptance of the exercise program in the pediatric population has been previously observed in a pilot study.
Physical activity Protocol
The children included in the experimental group will undergo 12 weeks of physical activity sessions, and it is mandatory that all children complete a minimum of two weekly sessions of physical activity for 50-60 minutes. The activities will consist of content such as motor and cognitive games, sports, dance, and gymnastics. The intensity of the sessions will be checked using accelerometry. The physical activity protocol is adapted from a previously described protocol (CMSP, 2021; Klem, Filha, Monteiro, 2017; Mazzoccante et al.; 2020; Paiano, 2019; Rodrigues, 2018; Rosini et al., 2014). Acceptance of the exercise program in the pediatric population has been previously observed in a pilot study.
Control group
The children will follow their usual school routines, including Physical Education classes as part of the curriculum
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Physical activity Protocol
The children included in the experimental group will undergo 12 weeks of physical activity sessions, and it is mandatory that all children complete a minimum of two weekly sessions of physical activity for 50-60 minutes. The activities will consist of content such as motor and cognitive games, sports, dance, and gymnastics. The intensity of the sessions will be checked using accelerometry. The physical activity protocol is adapted from a previously described protocol (CMSP, 2021; Klem, Filha, Monteiro, 2017; Mazzoccante et al.; 2020; Paiano, 2019; Rodrigues, 2018; Rosini et al., 2014). Acceptance of the exercise program in the pediatric population has been previously observed in a pilot study.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Neurotypical.
Exclusion Criteria
Hypertension
Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus
Neurodiversity
Not be taking any drugs
Cannot participated in sports practices
8 Years
11 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
State University of Londrina
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Carla Cristiane Silva
Principal Investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
School
Nova Fátima, Paraná, Brazil
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Contreras-Osorio F, Guzman-Guzman IP, Cerda-Vega E, Chirosa-Rios L, Ramirez-Campillo R, Campos-Jara C. Effects of the Type of Sports Practice on the Executive Functions of Schoolchildren. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 24;19(7):3886. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19073886.
Davis CL, Tomporowski PD, McDowell JE, Austin BP, Miller PH, Yanasak NE, Allison JD, Naglieri JA. Exercise improves executive function and achievement and alters brain activation in overweight children: a randomized, controlled trial. Health Psychol. 2011 Jan;30(1):91-8. doi: 10.1037/a0021766.
de Greeff JW, Bosker RJ, Oosterlaan J, Visscher C, Hartman E. Effects of physical activity on executive functions, attention and academic performance in preadolescent children: a meta-analysis. J Sci Med Sport. 2018 May;21(5):501-507. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.09.595. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
Diamond A. Executive functions. Annu Rev Psychol. 2013;64:135-68. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750. Epub 2012 Sep 27.
Diamond A, Lee K. Interventions shown to aid executive function development in children 4 to 12 years old. Science. 2011 Aug 19;333(6045):959-64. doi: 10.1126/science.1204529.
Evenson KR, Catellier DJ, Gill K, Ondrak KS, McMurray RG. Calibration of two objective measures of physical activity for children. J Sports Sci. 2008 Dec;26(14):1557-65. doi: 10.1080/02640410802334196.
Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91. doi: 10.3758/bf03193146.
Fuster JM. The prefrontal cortex--an update: time is of the essence. Neuron. 2001 May;30(2):319-33. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00285-9. No abstract available.
Kessels RP, van Zandvoort MJ, Postma A, Kappelle LJ, de Haan EH. The Corsi Block-Tapping Task: standardization and normative data. Appl Neuropsychol. 2000;7(4):252-8. doi: 10.1207/S15324826AN0704_8.
Leger LA, Mercier D, Gadoury C, Lambert J. The multistage 20 metre shuttle run test for aerobic fitness. J Sports Sci. 1988 Summer;6(2):93-101. doi: 10.1080/02640418808729800.
MacLeod CM. Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. Psychol Bull. 1991 Mar;109(2):163-203. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.163. No abstract available.
Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gotzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, Elbourne D, Egger M, Altman DG. CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010 Mar 23;340:c869. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c869. No abstract available.
Moreira JPA, Lopes MC, Miranda-Junior MV, Valentini NC, Lage GM, Albuquerque MR. Korperkoordinationstest Fur Kinder (KTK) for Brazilian Children and Adolescents: Factor Analysis, Invariance and Factor Score. Front Psychol. 2019 Nov 19;10:2524. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02524. eCollection 2019.
Nascimento WMD, Henrique NR, Marques MDS. KTK MOTOR TEST: REVIEW OF THE MAIN INFLUENCING VARIABLES. Rev Paul Pediatr. 2019 Jun 19;37(3):372-381. doi: 10.1590/1984-0462/;2019;37;3;00013. eCollection 2019.
Serrien DJ, Ivry RB, Swinnen SP. The missing link between action and cognition. Prog Neurobiol. 2007 Jun;82(2):95-107. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2007.02.003. Epub 2007 Feb 23.
Rigoli D, Piek JP, Kane R, Oosterlaan J. Motor coordination, working memory, and academic achievement in a normative adolescent sample: testing a mediation model. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2012 Nov;27(7):766-80. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acs061. Epub 2012 Jul 9.
Roebers CM, Kauer M. Motor and cognitive control in a normative sample of 7-year-olds. Dev Sci. 2009 Jan;12(1):175-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00755.x.
van der Fels IM, Te Wierike SC, Hartman E, Elferink-Gemser MT, Smith J, Visscher C. The relationship between motor skills and cognitive skills in 4-16 year old typically developing children: A systematic review. J Sci Med Sport. 2015 Nov;18(6):697-703. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2014.09.007. Epub 2014 Sep 21.
Visier-Alfonso ME, Alvarez-Bueno C, Sanchez-Lopez M, Cavero-Redondo I, Martinez-Hortelano JA, Nieto-Lopez M, Martinez-Vizcaino V. Fitness and executive function as mediators between physical activity and academic achievement. J Sports Sci. 2021 Jul;39(14):1576-1584. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2021.1886665. Epub 2021 Feb 21.
Wassenberg R, Feron FJ, Kessels AG, Hendriksen JG, Kalff AC, Kroes M, Hurks PP, Beeren M, Jolles J, Vles JS. Relation between cognitive and motor performance in 5- to 6-year-old children: results from a large-scale cross-sectional study. Child Dev. 2005 Sep-Oct;76(5):1092-103. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00899.x.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
UEL
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.