Effect of a School Intervention With Physical Activity on Executive Functions

NCT ID: NCT06496503

Last Updated: 2025-05-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-09-02

Study Completion Date

2025-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Previous studies have indicated the relationship between physical activity and cognitive performance, with movement being a promising tool for improving executive functions, especially during childhood, which is a period of intense brain development. Thus, the objective of this project is to verify a school physical activity intervention on executive functions and the relationships with cardiorespiratory fitness and motor coordination. This will be a randomized control trial in accordance with the Consort - Statement, including 118 children of both sexes; 60 in an experimental group and 58 in a control group. The children will follow their usual school routines, including Physical Education classes as part of the curriculum. The experimental group will also participate in an intervention for 12 weeks after school. The intervention will include three weekly physical exercise sessions, lasting between 50 and 60 minutes. The sessions will consist of activities involving games, sports, dance with a focus on aspects of motor coordination and cardiorespiratory fitness, as well as cognitive games. Assessments will be carried out at baseline, after 12 weeks of intervention and after the follow-up period. The students will undergo measurements of body mass and height, as well as nutritional classification using the body mass index (BMI). Following this, a general motor coordination test (KTK), a cardiorespiratory aptitude test (Léger), and tests to assess executive functions (Stroop and Corsi Block) will be applied. Data distribution will be verified using the Shapiro-Wilk's test. The comparisons between different moments (baseline, after 12 weeks, and at follow-up) will be performed using repeated measures ANOVA. Sphericity will be checked by Mauchly's test followed by the Greenhouse- Geisser correction when necessary. To identify differences, the Bonferroni correction will be applied. The significance level will be set at 5% (P\<0.05).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

During childhood, cognitive aspects of the prefrontal cortex are in the maturation phase. This process is associated with improvements in executive functions, in a continuous process, and although differentiated by its multiple aspects, it seems to correspond with the development peaks of the prefrontal cortex, which occur between 7 and 9 years of age. In addition to the biological alterations arising from the growth and development of the brain, physical activity performed regularly indicates a simple and effective way to improve the executive functions of children. Contreras-Osorio and colleagues stated that physical activity performed at moderate and vigorous intensities is positively related to working memory, reaction time, executive attention, cognitive flexibility, and planning in children and adolescents aged 10 to 12 years. Other authors highlight that activities involving cardiorespiratory fitness and motor coordination provide an increase in cognitive performance, with improvements in planning capacity, memory, self-control, and value judgment, among other fundamental components for social interaction and academic performance In a previous study, Visier-Alfonso and colleagues evaluated 186 school-age children aged 9 to 11 years and demonstrated positive effects on cardiorespiratory fitness, with increased physical activity, and positive changes in inhibitory control, working memory, and brain structure. Additionally, good levels of motor coordination are associated with complex movements and sport-specific skills, and are also essential for the development of higher levels of cognitive function. The relationships between motor skills and executive functions during childhood are based on coactivation events between the prefrontal cortex, the cerebellum, and the basal ganglia during different motor and cognitive tasks, especially when the task is complex, is a new task, or requires speed and concentration. This is because neural regions typically associated with cognitive operations can also be recruited during the performance of motor tasks.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Healthy Lifestyle

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Randomization will be performed carefully following the recommendations proposed by the Cochrane Collaboration. The process will consist of two stages, firstly, the generation of numbers using a random number table, and secondly, allocation concealment, using opaque, sealed envelopes. After signing the consent form, an envelope will be opened for each child and they will be instructed as to which group they have been allocated, the experimental or control.
Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Investigators Outcome Assessors
The team of evaluators, teachers, and researchers who process the results will be completely independent. At all stages of the study (baseline until follow-up) the same outcome assessors will be recruited. None of the individuals, researchers, or evaluators involved will have knowledge as to group allocation. The professional responsible for the physical activities will be hired for this purpose and not belong to the project research team.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Experimental group

The children included in the experimental group will undergo 12 weeks of physical activity sessions, and it is mandatory that all children complete a minimum of two weekly sessions of physical activity for 50-60 minutes. The activities will consist of content such as motor and cognitive games, sports, dance, and gymnastics. The intensity of the sessions will be checked using accelerometry. The physical activity protocol is adapted from a previously described protocol (CMSP, 2021; Klem, Filha, Monteiro, 2017; Mazzoccante et al.; 2020; Paiano, 2019; Rodrigues, 2018; Rosini et al., 2014). Acceptance of the exercise program in the pediatric population has been previously observed in a pilot study.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Physical activity Protocol

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The children included in the experimental group will undergo 12 weeks of physical activity sessions, and it is mandatory that all children complete a minimum of two weekly sessions of physical activity for 50-60 minutes. The activities will consist of content such as motor and cognitive games, sports, dance, and gymnastics. The intensity of the sessions will be checked using accelerometry. The physical activity protocol is adapted from a previously described protocol (CMSP, 2021; Klem, Filha, Monteiro, 2017; Mazzoccante et al.; 2020; Paiano, 2019; Rodrigues, 2018; Rosini et al., 2014). Acceptance of the exercise program in the pediatric population has been previously observed in a pilot study.

Control group

The children will follow their usual school routines, including Physical Education classes as part of the curriculum

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Physical activity Protocol

The children included in the experimental group will undergo 12 weeks of physical activity sessions, and it is mandatory that all children complete a minimum of two weekly sessions of physical activity for 50-60 minutes. The activities will consist of content such as motor and cognitive games, sports, dance, and gymnastics. The intensity of the sessions will be checked using accelerometry. The physical activity protocol is adapted from a previously described protocol (CMSP, 2021; Klem, Filha, Monteiro, 2017; Mazzoccante et al.; 2020; Paiano, 2019; Rodrigues, 2018; Rosini et al., 2014). Acceptance of the exercise program in the pediatric population has been previously observed in a pilot study.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Healthy

Neurotypical.

Exclusion Criteria

Clinical or historical of cardiovascular disease

Hypertension

Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

Neurodiversity

Not be taking any drugs

Cannot participated in sports practices
Minimum Eligible Age

8 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

11 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

State University of Londrina

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Carla Cristiane Silva

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

School

Nova Fátima, Paraná, Brazil

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Brazil

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Contreras-Osorio F, Guzman-Guzman IP, Cerda-Vega E, Chirosa-Rios L, Ramirez-Campillo R, Campos-Jara C. Effects of the Type of Sports Practice on the Executive Functions of Schoolchildren. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 24;19(7):3886. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19073886.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35409571 (View on PubMed)

Davis CL, Tomporowski PD, McDowell JE, Austin BP, Miller PH, Yanasak NE, Allison JD, Naglieri JA. Exercise improves executive function and achievement and alters brain activation in overweight children: a randomized, controlled trial. Health Psychol. 2011 Jan;30(1):91-8. doi: 10.1037/a0021766.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21299297 (View on PubMed)

de Greeff JW, Bosker RJ, Oosterlaan J, Visscher C, Hartman E. Effects of physical activity on executive functions, attention and academic performance in preadolescent children: a meta-analysis. J Sci Med Sport. 2018 May;21(5):501-507. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.09.595. Epub 2017 Oct 10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29054748 (View on PubMed)

Diamond A. Executive functions. Annu Rev Psychol. 2013;64:135-68. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750. Epub 2012 Sep 27.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23020641 (View on PubMed)

Diamond A, Lee K. Interventions shown to aid executive function development in children 4 to 12 years old. Science. 2011 Aug 19;333(6045):959-64. doi: 10.1126/science.1204529.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21852486 (View on PubMed)

Evenson KR, Catellier DJ, Gill K, Ondrak KS, McMurray RG. Calibration of two objective measures of physical activity for children. J Sports Sci. 2008 Dec;26(14):1557-65. doi: 10.1080/02640410802334196.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18949660 (View on PubMed)

Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91. doi: 10.3758/bf03193146.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17695343 (View on PubMed)

Fuster JM. The prefrontal cortex--an update: time is of the essence. Neuron. 2001 May;30(2):319-33. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00285-9. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11394996 (View on PubMed)

Kessels RP, van Zandvoort MJ, Postma A, Kappelle LJ, de Haan EH. The Corsi Block-Tapping Task: standardization and normative data. Appl Neuropsychol. 2000;7(4):252-8. doi: 10.1207/S15324826AN0704_8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11296689 (View on PubMed)

Leger LA, Mercier D, Gadoury C, Lambert J. The multistage 20 metre shuttle run test for aerobic fitness. J Sports Sci. 1988 Summer;6(2):93-101. doi: 10.1080/02640418808729800.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 3184250 (View on PubMed)

MacLeod CM. Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. Psychol Bull. 1991 Mar;109(2):163-203. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.163. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 2034749 (View on PubMed)

Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gotzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, Elbourne D, Egger M, Altman DG. CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010 Mar 23;340:c869. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c869. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20332511 (View on PubMed)

Moreira JPA, Lopes MC, Miranda-Junior MV, Valentini NC, Lage GM, Albuquerque MR. Korperkoordinationstest Fur Kinder (KTK) for Brazilian Children and Adolescents: Factor Analysis, Invariance and Factor Score. Front Psychol. 2019 Nov 19;10:2524. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02524. eCollection 2019.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31803092 (View on PubMed)

Nascimento WMD, Henrique NR, Marques MDS. KTK MOTOR TEST: REVIEW OF THE MAIN INFLUENCING VARIABLES. Rev Paul Pediatr. 2019 Jun 19;37(3):372-381. doi: 10.1590/1984-0462/;2019;37;3;00013. eCollection 2019.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31241688 (View on PubMed)

Serrien DJ, Ivry RB, Swinnen SP. The missing link between action and cognition. Prog Neurobiol. 2007 Jun;82(2):95-107. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2007.02.003. Epub 2007 Feb 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17399884 (View on PubMed)

Rigoli D, Piek JP, Kane R, Oosterlaan J. Motor coordination, working memory, and academic achievement in a normative adolescent sample: testing a mediation model. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2012 Nov;27(7):766-80. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acs061. Epub 2012 Jul 9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22777140 (View on PubMed)

Roebers CM, Kauer M. Motor and cognitive control in a normative sample of 7-year-olds. Dev Sci. 2009 Jan;12(1):175-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00755.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19120425 (View on PubMed)

van der Fels IM, Te Wierike SC, Hartman E, Elferink-Gemser MT, Smith J, Visscher C. The relationship between motor skills and cognitive skills in 4-16 year old typically developing children: A systematic review. J Sci Med Sport. 2015 Nov;18(6):697-703. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2014.09.007. Epub 2014 Sep 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25311901 (View on PubMed)

Visier-Alfonso ME, Alvarez-Bueno C, Sanchez-Lopez M, Cavero-Redondo I, Martinez-Hortelano JA, Nieto-Lopez M, Martinez-Vizcaino V. Fitness and executive function as mediators between physical activity and academic achievement. J Sports Sci. 2021 Jul;39(14):1576-1584. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2021.1886665. Epub 2021 Feb 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33612080 (View on PubMed)

Wassenberg R, Feron FJ, Kessels AG, Hendriksen JG, Kalff AC, Kroes M, Hurks PP, Beeren M, Jolles J, Vles JS. Relation between cognitive and motor performance in 5- to 6-year-old children: results from a large-scale cross-sectional study. Child Dev. 2005 Sep-Oct;76(5):1092-103. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00899.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16150004 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UEL

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.