End-Tidal Oxygen for Intubation in the Emergency Department

NCT ID: NCT06578468

Last Updated: 2024-09-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

1400 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-08-05

Study Completion Date

2025-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Rapid Sequence Intubation (RSI) is a high-risk procedure in the emergency department (ED). Patients are routinely preoxygenated (given supplemental oxygen) prior to RSI to prevent hypoxia during intubation. For many years anaesthetists have used end-tidal oxygen (ETO2) levels to guide the effectiveness of preoxygenation prior to intubation. The ETO2 gives an objective measurement of preoxygenation efficacy. This is currently not available in most EDs.

This trial evaluates the use of ETO2 on the rate of hypoxia during intubation for patients in the ED.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTION

Rapid Sequence Intubation (RSI) is a common procedure in Emergency Departments (ED). However, it is a high-risk procedure and is associated with significant complications including hypoxia, failed intubation, hypotension, trauma and aspiration. (1-3) Specifically, hypoxia during intubation can lead to poor outcomes such as dysrhythmias, haemodynamic compromise, hypoxic brain injury and death and therefore oxygen desaturation is of primary concern during any intubation procedure. (4, 5) In order to prevent desaturation events during intubation, a number of steps are taken by clinicians. These include optimal patient positioning, adequate preoxygenation, assessment of airway anatomy and development of a detailed airway plan as well as the use of apnoeic oxygenation.(6)

Effective preoxygenation is vital to ensure that the patient does not develop hypoxia during the period between induction (administration of sedative and paralytic agents) and restoration of ventilation by successful endotracheal intubation or rescue breathing. Various methods of preoxygenation have been developed to wash the nitrogen out of the lungs (denitrogenation) which allows the functional residual capacity (FRC) to act as an oxygen reservoir during intubation, which prolongs safe apnoea time, therefore, preventing desaturation whilst an endotracheal tube (ETT) is placed.

Adequate preoxygenation is especially important for those patients at highest risk of hypoxia during the RSI. This patient group includes those with underlying lung pathology e.g. pneumonia, patients with increased metabolic demand e.g. sepsis, patients with an oxygen requirement prior to RSI, or patients with underlying conditions that predisposes to hypoxia e.g. obesity.

For many years anaesthetists have used end-tidal oxygen (ETO2) levels to guide the effectiveness of preoxygenation. ETO2 measures the exhaled oxygen concentration and is a marker of the oxygen concentration in the alveoli. Prior to induction, anaesthetists most commonly preoxygenate with a face-mask seal via either a circle circuit, Mapleson circuit, or bag valve mask. ETO2 provides an objective measurement of preoxygenation efficacy. The Difficult Airway Society guidelines suggest aiming for an ETO2 of ≥87% prior to commencing RSI.(7) ETO2 levels are not routinely measured in Emergency Departments.

Currently, it is not possible to measure the effectiveness of preoxygenation in the ED. Pulse-wave oximetry reflects peripheral oxygen saturation and not the pulmonary oxygen concentration. Therefore, to attempt to optimize preoxygenation the emergency clinician currently can only use time as a surrogate. The typically recommended duration of preoxygenation is \> 3 minutes.

Recently, the investigators conducted two multi-site studies (Ethics identifier: 2019/ETH06644) that investigated the use of ETO2 in the ED.(8, 9) The first study was conducted with clinicians blinded to the ETO2 result (8). The investigators demonstrated that preoxygenation was uniformly poor with only 26% of patients achieving the required target ETO2 of ≥85%. The investigators then completed a second study where clinicians had access to ETO2 values and found that the proportion of patients reaching levels ≥85% was improved to 67% of patients. (9) The prevalence of hypoxemia (SpO2 \<90%) in the group blinded to ETO2 was 18% (n=18, 95% CI: 11% to 27%) and was 8% in the group where ETO2 was available (n = 8, 95% CI: 4% to 15%). These studies indicate that the use of ETO2 may substantially improve preoxygenation in the ED and therefore reduce the risk of hypoxia.

These studies, however, were focused on preoxygenation practices and not patient-oriented outcomes (hypoxia) and were limited in design and resources. Consequently, it is still unclear whether the use of ETO2 in the ED leads to improved clinical outcomes.

RATIONALE FOR PERFORMING THE STUDY

The aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness of ETO2 monitoring in preventing desaturation for patients with a high risk of hypoxia undergoing RSI in ED.

HYPOTHESIS

The investigators hypothesise that the use of ETO2 monitoring leads to reduced rates of oxygen desaturation during the peri-intubation period compared to when it is not used.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Critical Illness Hypoxia Respiratory Failure

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Stepped-wedge randomised control trial
Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control period

The control period includes a period whereby clinicians will not have access to ETO2 monitoring and routine RSI practices will be documented including all study variables. At all institutions, RSI is performed in a similar manner, utilising an airway checklist. There is no 'standard operating procedure' for RSI in any of the EDs and methods, therefore, vary depending on clinician preference and the condition of the patient, however, each site is a tertiary-level, university teaching hospital and therefore clinical practice is up to date and evidence-based. Standard preoxygenation methods in the Emergency department often consist of a bag-valve mask, with or without a PEEP valve, set at 15L/min, or the use of non-invasive ventilation or a non-rebreather mask, with or without a nasal cannula, set at 15 L/min or flush rate oxygen (\>40 L/min). US sites have access to high-flow (\>30L/min) oxygen. This is the only difference in the preoxygenation method.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Study period

For all patients involved in the study, the only intervention will be the use of ETO2 to guide preoxygenation. All aspects of RSI will be at the discretion of the treating clinician including sedative/paralytic medications, positioning of the patient, preoxygenation method, intubation techniques and post-intubation sedation.

Clinicians will be encouraged to aim for the highest ETO2 result possible with a goal of \>85%. Clinicians will be able to view the ETO2 values and can decide on any changes to the preoxygenation techniques if deemed necessary. These techniques may include improved patient positioning, improved face mask seal, increased oxygen flow, length of preoxygenation time, or altering the preoxygenation device.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

End-tidal oxygen monitor

Intervention Type DEVICE

The only additional equipment required for this study is the Philips™ IntelliVue G7m Gas Analyser Module 866173. This provides a non-dispersive infrared measurement of respiratory gases and a paramagnetic measurement of oxygen. At Lincoln Medical Center, the gas analyser used will be a Philips G5 gas analyser connected to a Philips Intellivue MP 70. At the University of New Mexico Medical Center, the Masimo root monitor is used.

The gas analysers produce display waves for O2 and CO2, together with numerics for end-tidal values for O2 and CO2 and to our knowledge, there are no differences in values between the various devices used. The gas sampling occurs through a side-stream sampling tube at a rate of 200ml/min ±20 ml/min, which is either obtained from a nasal cannula in the spontaneously breathing patient or a sidestream line if connected to a BVM.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

End-tidal oxygen monitor

The only additional equipment required for this study is the Philips™ IntelliVue G7m Gas Analyser Module 866173. This provides a non-dispersive infrared measurement of respiratory gases and a paramagnetic measurement of oxygen. At Lincoln Medical Center, the gas analyser used will be a Philips G5 gas analyser connected to a Philips Intellivue MP 70. At the University of New Mexico Medical Center, the Masimo root monitor is used.

The gas analysers produce display waves for O2 and CO2, together with numerics for end-tidal values for O2 and CO2 and to our knowledge, there are no differences in values between the various devices used. The gas sampling occurs through a side-stream sampling tube at a rate of 200ml/min ±20 ml/min, which is either obtained from a nasal cannula in the spontaneously breathing patient or a sidestream line if connected to a BVM.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. The patient is located in the ED resuscitation bay of the participating centre.
2. The planned procedure is orotracheal intubation using a laryngoscope and RSI technique with preoxygenation for patients who are spontaneously breathing.
3. The patient is deemed to be at a high risk of hypoxia during RSI as per the treating ED clinician, as defined by:

* Any patient requiring any form of oxygen therapy before preoxygenation.
* Any patient with respiratory pathology based on clinical or radiological findings. Including, but not limited to:

* Pneumonia, pulmonary oedema, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), aspiration, pulmonary contusion from trauma, infective exacerbations of known lung disease (e.g. asthma, pulmonary fibrosis, emphysema) or pulmonary embolism (PE)
* Any patient with high oxygen consumption. Including, but not limited to:

* Sepsis, Diabetic ketoacidosis, alcohol or drug withdrawal, seizures, thyrotoxicosis
* Any underlying patient condition that may predispose to hypoxemia. Including, but not limited to:

* Obesity, pregnancy, underlying lung disease (e.g. asthma, pulmonary fibrosis, emphysema), severe injury- hypovolaemia/haemorrhage.
* or any other patient that the treating clinician has a high concern for hypoxemia during RSI.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patient is known to be less than 18 years old.
2. The patient has a supraglottic device in-situ e.g iGel or LMA.
3. The patient is known to be pregnant.
4. The patient is known to be a prisoner.
5. The patient was intubated in the prehospital environment.
6. Immediate need for tracheal intubation precludes preoxygenation i.e. the patient is in cardiac arrest.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Sydney Local Health District

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Matthew Oliver

Staff Specialist

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Matthew Oliver, MBBS

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Sydney Local Health District

Nick Caputo, Md

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Lincoln Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hennepin Medical Center

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

University of New Mexico Medical Center

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Lincoln Medical Center

The Bronx, New York, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Westmead Hospital

Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Royal Prince Alfred Hospital

Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status RECRUITING

Liverpool Hospital

Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Northern Beaches Hospital

Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status RECRUITING

Royal North Shore Hospital

Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

The Alfred Hospital

Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Matthew Oliver, MBBS

Role: CONTACT

+61410188680

Naomi Derrick

Role: CONTACT

+61457240478

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Brian Driver, MD

Role: primary

Darren Braude, MD

Role: primary

Nicholas Caputo, MD

Role: primary

Andrew Coggins, MBBS

Role: primary

Matthew Oliver, MBBS

Role: primary

+61410188680

Naomi Derrick

Role: backup

+61457240478

Ian Ferguson, MBBS

Role: primary

Cliff Reid, MBBS

Role: primary

Brian Burns, MBBS

Role: backup

Toby Fogg, MBBS

Role: primary

Chris Partyka, MBBS

Role: backup

John Vassiliadis

Role: backup

Chris Groombridge, MBBS

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Martin LD, Mhyre JM, Shanks AM, Tremper KK, Kheterpal S. 3,423 emergency tracheal intubations at a university hospital: airway outcomes and complications. Anesthesiology. 2011 Jan;114(1):42-8. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318201c415.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21150574 (View on PubMed)

Bair AE, Filbin MR, Kulkarni RG, Walls RM. The failed intubation attempt in the emergency department: analysis of prevalence, rescue techniques, and personnel. J Emerg Med. 2002 Aug;23(2):131-40. doi: 10.1016/s0736-4679(02)00501-2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12359280 (View on PubMed)

Alkhouri H, Vassiliadis J, Murray M, Mackenzie J, Tzannes A, McCarthy S, Fogg T. Emergency airway management in Australian and New Zealand emergency departments: A multicentre descriptive study of 3710 emergency intubations. Emerg Med Australas. 2017 Oct;29(5):499-508. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.12815. Epub 2017 Jun 5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28582801 (View on PubMed)

Mort TC. The incidence and risk factors for cardiac arrest during emergency tracheal intubation: a justification for incorporating the ASA Guidelines in the remote location. J Clin Anesth. 2004 Nov;16(7):508-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2004.01.007.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15590254 (View on PubMed)

Davis DP, Dunford JV, Poste JC, Ochs M, Holbrook T, Fortlage D, Size MJ, Kennedy F, Hoyt DB. The impact of hypoxia and hyperventilation on outcome after paramedic rapid sequence intubation of severely head-injured patients. J Trauma. 2004 Jul;57(1):1-8; discussion 8-10. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000135503.71684.c8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15284540 (View on PubMed)

Weingart SD, Levitan RM. Preoxygenation and prevention of desaturation during emergency airway management. Ann Emerg Med. 2012 Mar;59(3):165-75.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.10.002. Epub 2011 Nov 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22050948 (View on PubMed)

Frerk C, Mitchell VS, McNarry AF, Mendonca C, Bhagrath R, Patel A, O'Sullivan EP, Woodall NM, Ahmad I; Difficult Airway Society intubation guidelines working group. Difficult Airway Society 2015 guidelines for management of unanticipated difficult intubation in adults. Br J Anaesth. 2015 Dec;115(6):827-48. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev371. Epub 2015 Nov 10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26556848 (View on PubMed)

Caputo ND, Oliver M, West JR, Hackett R, Sakles JC. Use of End Tidal Oxygen Monitoring to Assess Preoxygenation During Rapid Sequence Intubation in the Emergency Department. Ann Emerg Med. 2019 Sep;74(3):410-415. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.01.038. Epub 2019 Mar 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30879700 (View on PubMed)

Oliver M, Caputo ND, West JR, Hackett R, Sakles JC. Emergency physician use of end-tidal oxygen monitoring for rapidsequence intubation. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2020 Sep 28;1(5):706-713. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12260. eCollection 2020 Oct.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33145509 (View on PubMed)

American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) Policy statement: Rapid-Sequence Intubation February 2018 [Available from: https://www.acep.org/patient-care/policy-statements/rapid-sequence-intubation/.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Hemming K, Kasza J, Hooper R, Forbes A, Taljaard M. A tutorial on sample size calculation for multiple-period cluster randomized parallel, cross-over and stepped-wedge trials using the Shiny CRT Calculator. Int J Epidemiol. 2020 Jun 1;49(3):979-995. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyz237.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32087011 (View on PubMed)

Hemming K, Haines TP, Chilton PJ, Girling AJ, Lilford RJ. The stepped wedge cluster randomised trial: rationale, design, analysis, and reporting. BMJ. 2015 Feb 6;350:h391. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h391. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25662947 (View on PubMed)

Driver BE, Prekker ME, Klein LR, Reardon RF, Miner JR, Fagerstrom ET, Cleghorn MR, McGill JW, Cole JB. Effect of Use of a Bougie vs Endotracheal Tube and Stylet on First-Attempt Intubation Success Among Patients With Difficult Airways Undergoing Emergency Intubation: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2018 Jun 5;319(21):2179-2189. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.6496.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29800096 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

24-008

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Four Methods of Pre-oxygenation
NCT02708862 COMPLETED NA
SCO2T (Servo vs. Servo)
NCT04546568 TERMINATED NA