Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Two Methods of Regional Anesthesia During S-ICD Implantation Procedure.

NCT ID: NCT06520150

Last Updated: 2024-07-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

32 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-06-16

Study Completion Date

2025-12-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Our study consists of a combination of regional blockade ('local' anesthesia) of the anterior and lateral chest wall in the form of a thin needle prick and the supply of local anesthetic drugs to the area of the relevant chest wall structures to exclude all stimuli, including pain from the operative site. A short-acting analgesic and sedative drug will be administered intravenously throughout the procedure - in a dose that allows the required contact between the patient and the anesthetist. If necessary, the dose of the drug may be increased to maintain pain comfort throughout the procedure.

The anesthetic team will be with the patient throughout the procedure to ensure comfort and safety.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The current study is a continuation of the 2021-2023 project, during which 16 patients were anesthetized using a combination of previously known regional (PSP +SSAP) blocks in the thoracic area for S-ICD implantation. PSP (pectoserratus plane) block, previously known in scientific nomenclature as (PECS II /DPP/ PNB II) is a block placed under the pectoralis minor muscle between the pectoralis anterior muscle or also under it in the area of the III/IV rib lateral to the midclavicular line. SSAP (superficial serratus anterior plane) block is formerly known as SABP block, which is a block placed at the height of the fifth intercostal in the medial/posterior axillary line between the anterior pterygoid muscle and the dorsal widest muscle.

In some cases, this allowed the procedure to be carried out due to patient burdens, relative contraindications and high risk of complications during general anesthesia. After studies related to the volume of local anesthetics administered as well as the concentration of their mixture, the optimal concentration of the substance used for regional blockade was chosen. This is a mixture of 0.125% ropivacaine solution with 0.25% lidocaine solution in a total volume of 60mL of administered solution.

Superficial parastenal intercostal plane block (SPIP) formerly known as TTP/ PIP/ PIFP/ SIP/ PSP which is an alternative combination in combination with SSAP is a block in which we deposit a local anesthetic in the parasternal line at the level of the 4th and 5th intercostal spaces between the internal intercostal muscle and the transverse thoracic muscle.

The purpose of the study is to determine whether SPIP+SSAP blockade is the optimal form of anesthesia for S-ICD implantation.

The patient, after qualifying by the cardiologist for S-ICD implantation, will undergo a standard anesthesiological qualification process with evaluation of basic demographic parameters, examination of body mass composition by bioimpedance, comorbidities, medications taken, determination of surgical risk according to the ASA scale ( American Society of Anesthesiology) in addition, the patient will be checked for any contraindications to the use of regional blockade as a method of anesthesia. After qualification, the patient will be asked to read the consent to participate in the study and sign the informed consent form.

Patients will receive standard premedication in the form of 1g of paracetamol and 150mg of pregabalin orally 30min before the procedure.

The subjects will be randomly divided into 2 groups - Group I will be patients administered PSP+SSAP anesthesia (consecutively 20+40ml of the mixture indicated above). Group II will be patients given SPIP+SSAP blockade ( consecutively 20+40ml of the mixture indicated above). It was tentatively planned to conduct the study on a group of 32 patients (16 in each of the two groups).

Anesthesiologists administering anesthesia prior to surgery receive an envelope with a randomly indicated method of anesthesia based on simple randomization determines the type of regional blockade used during the procedure). The subject will not know which study group he or she has been classified into. The operator performing the procedure will not be informed of the type of anesthesia performed -\[randomization by double-blinding\]. The operator performing the procedure will not be informed about the type of block performed in order to objectivize the extent and quality of the subject's anesthesia, which he will evaluate after the procedure according to a scale of subjective operator comfort created (EOA scale).

During the procedure, i.v. analgesia with the short-acting opioid remifentanil in the dose range of 0.025ug/kg/min to 0.1ug/kg/min will be administered as needed to control pain.

Increasing the dosage of the drug above these doses for pain control will be a disqualifying factor for the patient from further examination and the blockade will be considered ineffective which will be associated with receiving the lowest possible value on the operator's comfort scale. The use of i.v analgesics in the form of ketoprofen 100mg, metamizole 2.5g will also be allowed during the procedure.

During the procedure, the operator will be allowed to additionally administer local anesthesia to the area of the surgical field where severe pain is experienced. Infiltration of the surgical field with a solution of 1% lidocaine with epinephrine in a volume of no more than 40ml will then be performed If it is necessary to exceed the volume of local anesthesia, the patient will be disqualified from further examination. After the procedure, for the purpose of test defibrillation (checking the function of the implanted device), the patient will be put under short-term deeper sedation with propofol at a single dose of 1-3mg/kg/m.c. on one occasion.

During the procedure, in order to assess the patient's pain, NRS(numerical pain scale) or VAS(visual analog scale) scales will be checked every 15min. At the same intervals, the patient's level of sedation will be assessed using the RASS (Richmond agitation/sedation scale) and GCS (Glasgow level of consciousness) scales. Parameters such as SpO2 (hemoglobin oxygen saturation) NIBP( non-invasive blood pressure measurement) or HR (heart rate) will be monitored every 5min.

The NRS check in post-operative care will be done every 6h on the first day, the QoR-15 form (post-operative quality of life and improvement scale) will be given to the patient to fill in 24h after surgery.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chest Pain Pain, Procedural Pain, Postoperative Analgesia Regional Anesthesia Morbidity Anesthesia, Local ICD

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

The subjects will be randomly divided into 2 groups - Group I will be patients administered PSP+SSAP anesthesia (consecutively 20+40ml of the mixture indicated above). Group II will be patients given SPIP+SSAP blockade (consecutively 20+40ml of the mixture indicated above). It was tentatively planned to conduct the study on a group of 32 patients (16 in each of the two groups).
Primary Study Purpose

SCREENING

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Caregivers
Anesthesiologists administering anesthesia prior to surgery receive an envelope with a randomly indicated method of anesthesia based on simple randomization determines the type of regional blockade used during the procedure). The subject will not know which study group he or she has been classified into. The operator performing the procedure will not be informed of the type of anesthesia performed -\[randomization by double-blinding\]. The operator performing the procedure will not be informed about the type of block performed in order to objectivize the extent and quality of the subject's anesthesia, which he will evaluate after the procedure according to a scale of subjective operator comfort created (EOA scale).

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group I (PSP+SSAP)

Group I will include patients undergoing PSP(Pectoserratus plane block)+SSAP(Superficial serratus anterior plane block) (20+40ml) The solution is defined as a combination of 0.125% ropivacaine solution with 0.25% lidocaine solution in a total volume of 60ml of liquid administered.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Regional anaesthetic combined fascial plane block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Prior to the procedure, the anaesthetists will receive an envelope from a person not related to the project (a hospital administrative staff member). This envelope will contain a randomly indicated method of anaesthesia based on simple randomisation. This will determine the type of regional block used during the procedure. It is important to note that the patient will not know which study group they have been classified in. Furthermore, the operator performing the procedure will not be informed of the type of anaesthesia performed. This is to ensure double-blinding. In order to ensure the highest standards of objectivity, the operator performing the procedure will not be informed about the type of block performed. This will allow us to assess the extent and quality of anaesthesia after the procedure, We will use a proprietary scale of subjective operator comfort scale.

Ropivacaine 0.125% Injectable Solution +Lignocaine 0,25% Injectable Solution

Intervention Type DRUG

administration under ultrasound guidance of a mixture of 2 local anaesthetics in a fixed total volume

Group I (SPIP+SSAP)

Group II will include patients undergoing SPIP(Superficial parastenal intercostal plane block)+SSAP(Superficial serratus anterior plane block) (20+40ml) The solution is defined as a combination of 0.125% ropivacaine solution with 0.25% lidocaine solution in a total volume of 60ml of liquid administered.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Regional anaesthetic combined fascial plane block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Prior to the procedure, the anaesthetists will receive an envelope from a person not related to the project (a hospital administrative staff member). This envelope will contain a randomly indicated method of anaesthesia based on simple randomisation. This will determine the type of regional block used during the procedure. It is important to note that the patient will not know which study group they have been classified in. Furthermore, the operator performing the procedure will not be informed of the type of anaesthesia performed. This is to ensure double-blinding. In order to ensure the highest standards of objectivity, the operator performing the procedure will not be informed about the type of block performed. This will allow us to assess the extent and quality of anaesthesia after the procedure, We will use a proprietary scale of subjective operator comfort scale.

Ropivacaine 0.125% Injectable Solution +Lignocaine 0,25% Injectable Solution

Intervention Type DRUG

administration under ultrasound guidance of a mixture of 2 local anaesthetics in a fixed total volume

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Regional anaesthetic combined fascial plane block

Prior to the procedure, the anaesthetists will receive an envelope from a person not related to the project (a hospital administrative staff member). This envelope will contain a randomly indicated method of anaesthesia based on simple randomisation. This will determine the type of regional block used during the procedure. It is important to note that the patient will not know which study group they have been classified in. Furthermore, the operator performing the procedure will not be informed of the type of anaesthesia performed. This is to ensure double-blinding. In order to ensure the highest standards of objectivity, the operator performing the procedure will not be informed about the type of block performed. This will allow us to assess the extent and quality of anaesthesia after the procedure, We will use a proprietary scale of subjective operator comfort scale.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Ropivacaine 0.125% Injectable Solution +Lignocaine 0,25% Injectable Solution

administration under ultrasound guidance of a mixture of 2 local anaesthetics in a fixed total volume

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

PSP SPIP SSAP

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patients aged 18-90 years requiring S-ICD implantation for cardiac indications,
* high risk of anesthesia (ASA II or higher), patients giving informed consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria

* absolute contraindications to regional anesthesia such as generalized coagulation disorders, inflammation at the site of anesthesia, allergy to the drugs used for regional anesthesia
* lack of consent of the patient for the conducted procedure,
* inability to cooperate with the patient - such as severe mental retardation, unregulated mental illness with motor agitation, advanced neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson's disease/Alzheimer's,
* inability to give informed consent to participate in the study.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

4th Military Clinical Hospital with Polyclinic, Poland

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Marek Szamborski

Senior Assistant, MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Marek Szamborski, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Senior Assistant

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

4th Military Clinical Hospital with Polyclinic

Wroclaw, Lower Silesian Voivodeship, Poland

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Poland

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Marek Szamborski, MD

Role: CONTACT

698448639 ext. +48

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Marek Szamborski, MD

Role: primary

698448639 ext. +48

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

3_2024

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.