Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Two Methods of Regional Anesthesia During S-ICD Implantation Procedure.
NCT ID: NCT06520150
Last Updated: 2024-07-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
32 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-06-16
2025-12-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The anesthetic team will be with the patient throughout the procedure to ensure comfort and safety.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Sedation Strategy on Duration Mechanical Ventilation in Patient After Cardiac Surgery
NCT05451121
Study of Rocuronium Onset Time According to Remifentanil Infusion
NCT01030510
Volatile Anesthetics to Reduce Mortality in Cardiac Surgery
NCT02105610
Remimazolam Phase II Cardiac Anesthesia Study
NCT01937767
Propofol Effects on Mitral Valve Annular Velocity
NCT01826149
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In some cases, this allowed the procedure to be carried out due to patient burdens, relative contraindications and high risk of complications during general anesthesia. After studies related to the volume of local anesthetics administered as well as the concentration of their mixture, the optimal concentration of the substance used for regional blockade was chosen. This is a mixture of 0.125% ropivacaine solution with 0.25% lidocaine solution in a total volume of 60mL of administered solution.
Superficial parastenal intercostal plane block (SPIP) formerly known as TTP/ PIP/ PIFP/ SIP/ PSP which is an alternative combination in combination with SSAP is a block in which we deposit a local anesthetic in the parasternal line at the level of the 4th and 5th intercostal spaces between the internal intercostal muscle and the transverse thoracic muscle.
The purpose of the study is to determine whether SPIP+SSAP blockade is the optimal form of anesthesia for S-ICD implantation.
The patient, after qualifying by the cardiologist for S-ICD implantation, will undergo a standard anesthesiological qualification process with evaluation of basic demographic parameters, examination of body mass composition by bioimpedance, comorbidities, medications taken, determination of surgical risk according to the ASA scale ( American Society of Anesthesiology) in addition, the patient will be checked for any contraindications to the use of regional blockade as a method of anesthesia. After qualification, the patient will be asked to read the consent to participate in the study and sign the informed consent form.
Patients will receive standard premedication in the form of 1g of paracetamol and 150mg of pregabalin orally 30min before the procedure.
The subjects will be randomly divided into 2 groups - Group I will be patients administered PSP+SSAP anesthesia (consecutively 20+40ml of the mixture indicated above). Group II will be patients given SPIP+SSAP blockade ( consecutively 20+40ml of the mixture indicated above). It was tentatively planned to conduct the study on a group of 32 patients (16 in each of the two groups).
Anesthesiologists administering anesthesia prior to surgery receive an envelope with a randomly indicated method of anesthesia based on simple randomization determines the type of regional blockade used during the procedure). The subject will not know which study group he or she has been classified into. The operator performing the procedure will not be informed of the type of anesthesia performed -\[randomization by double-blinding\]. The operator performing the procedure will not be informed about the type of block performed in order to objectivize the extent and quality of the subject's anesthesia, which he will evaluate after the procedure according to a scale of subjective operator comfort created (EOA scale).
During the procedure, i.v. analgesia with the short-acting opioid remifentanil in the dose range of 0.025ug/kg/min to 0.1ug/kg/min will be administered as needed to control pain.
Increasing the dosage of the drug above these doses for pain control will be a disqualifying factor for the patient from further examination and the blockade will be considered ineffective which will be associated with receiving the lowest possible value on the operator's comfort scale. The use of i.v analgesics in the form of ketoprofen 100mg, metamizole 2.5g will also be allowed during the procedure.
During the procedure, the operator will be allowed to additionally administer local anesthesia to the area of the surgical field where severe pain is experienced. Infiltration of the surgical field with a solution of 1% lidocaine with epinephrine in a volume of no more than 40ml will then be performed If it is necessary to exceed the volume of local anesthesia, the patient will be disqualified from further examination. After the procedure, for the purpose of test defibrillation (checking the function of the implanted device), the patient will be put under short-term deeper sedation with propofol at a single dose of 1-3mg/kg/m.c. on one occasion.
During the procedure, in order to assess the patient's pain, NRS(numerical pain scale) or VAS(visual analog scale) scales will be checked every 15min. At the same intervals, the patient's level of sedation will be assessed using the RASS (Richmond agitation/sedation scale) and GCS (Glasgow level of consciousness) scales. Parameters such as SpO2 (hemoglobin oxygen saturation) NIBP( non-invasive blood pressure measurement) or HR (heart rate) will be monitored every 5min.
The NRS check in post-operative care will be done every 6h on the first day, the QoR-15 form (post-operative quality of life and improvement scale) will be given to the patient to fill in 24h after surgery.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SCREENING
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group I (PSP+SSAP)
Group I will include patients undergoing PSP(Pectoserratus plane block)+SSAP(Superficial serratus anterior plane block) (20+40ml) The solution is defined as a combination of 0.125% ropivacaine solution with 0.25% lidocaine solution in a total volume of 60ml of liquid administered.
Regional anaesthetic combined fascial plane block
Prior to the procedure, the anaesthetists will receive an envelope from a person not related to the project (a hospital administrative staff member). This envelope will contain a randomly indicated method of anaesthesia based on simple randomisation. This will determine the type of regional block used during the procedure. It is important to note that the patient will not know which study group they have been classified in. Furthermore, the operator performing the procedure will not be informed of the type of anaesthesia performed. This is to ensure double-blinding. In order to ensure the highest standards of objectivity, the operator performing the procedure will not be informed about the type of block performed. This will allow us to assess the extent and quality of anaesthesia after the procedure, We will use a proprietary scale of subjective operator comfort scale.
Ropivacaine 0.125% Injectable Solution +Lignocaine 0,25% Injectable Solution
administration under ultrasound guidance of a mixture of 2 local anaesthetics in a fixed total volume
Group I (SPIP+SSAP)
Group II will include patients undergoing SPIP(Superficial parastenal intercostal plane block)+SSAP(Superficial serratus anterior plane block) (20+40ml) The solution is defined as a combination of 0.125% ropivacaine solution with 0.25% lidocaine solution in a total volume of 60ml of liquid administered.
Regional anaesthetic combined fascial plane block
Prior to the procedure, the anaesthetists will receive an envelope from a person not related to the project (a hospital administrative staff member). This envelope will contain a randomly indicated method of anaesthesia based on simple randomisation. This will determine the type of regional block used during the procedure. It is important to note that the patient will not know which study group they have been classified in. Furthermore, the operator performing the procedure will not be informed of the type of anaesthesia performed. This is to ensure double-blinding. In order to ensure the highest standards of objectivity, the operator performing the procedure will not be informed about the type of block performed. This will allow us to assess the extent and quality of anaesthesia after the procedure, We will use a proprietary scale of subjective operator comfort scale.
Ropivacaine 0.125% Injectable Solution +Lignocaine 0,25% Injectable Solution
administration under ultrasound guidance of a mixture of 2 local anaesthetics in a fixed total volume
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Regional anaesthetic combined fascial plane block
Prior to the procedure, the anaesthetists will receive an envelope from a person not related to the project (a hospital administrative staff member). This envelope will contain a randomly indicated method of anaesthesia based on simple randomisation. This will determine the type of regional block used during the procedure. It is important to note that the patient will not know which study group they have been classified in. Furthermore, the operator performing the procedure will not be informed of the type of anaesthesia performed. This is to ensure double-blinding. In order to ensure the highest standards of objectivity, the operator performing the procedure will not be informed about the type of block performed. This will allow us to assess the extent and quality of anaesthesia after the procedure, We will use a proprietary scale of subjective operator comfort scale.
Ropivacaine 0.125% Injectable Solution +Lignocaine 0,25% Injectable Solution
administration under ultrasound guidance of a mixture of 2 local anaesthetics in a fixed total volume
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* high risk of anesthesia (ASA II or higher), patients giving informed consent to participate in the study.
Exclusion Criteria
* lack of consent of the patient for the conducted procedure,
* inability to cooperate with the patient - such as severe mental retardation, unregulated mental illness with motor agitation, advanced neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson's disease/Alzheimer's,
* inability to give informed consent to participate in the study.
18 Years
90 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
4th Military Clinical Hospital with Polyclinic, Poland
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Marek Szamborski
Senior Assistant, MD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Marek Szamborski, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Senior Assistant
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
4th Military Clinical Hospital with Polyclinic
Wroclaw, Lower Silesian Voivodeship, Poland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
3_2024
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.