Comparison of Bolus Dosing of Methohexital and Propofol in Elective Direct Current Cardioversion
NCT ID: NCT04187196
Last Updated: 2023-11-13
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
73 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-04-29
2022-09-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effects of the Anesthetic Drug Propofol on the Way the Heart Recovers Between Beats
NCT00358618
Efficacy and Safety of HSK3486 Compared to Propofol in Induction of General Anesthesia in Adults Having Elective Surgery
NCT04711837
The Effect of Additional Propacetamol Infusion on Post Procedural Outcome and Opioid Consumption During Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation.
NCT02515188
Efficacy and Safety of HSK3486 Compared to Propofol for Adults Undergoing Elective Surgery With General Anesthesia
NCT05478174
Impact of Etomidate vs. Propofol on Infectious Complications Post Cardiac Surgery
NCT04281706
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Primary Hypothesis:
1. The mean time to recovery from sedation during a cardioversion using methohexital for sedation will be significantly shorter than the recovery time using propofol for sedation, as evidenced by a short time from initiation of induction to a score of 2 on the Ramsay Sedation Scale.
2. The mean time to a Ramsay score of 5-6 will be significantly shorter using methohexital than the time to the same sedation level using propofol
Secondary Hypothesis:
1\. There will be no significant increase in adverse events associated with the use of methohexital when compared with propofol.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Sedation with propofol group
Participants in this group will be randomized to sedation with bolus dosing of propofol for cardioversion.
Propofol
Propofol will be given at an initial dose of 0.8 mg/kg followed by 20 mg every minute after 2 minutes, if adequate sedation is not achieved
Sedation with methohexital group
Participants in this group will be randomized to sedation with bolus dosing of methohexital for cardioversion.
Methohexital
Methohexital will be given at an initial dose of 0.5 mg/kg, followed by 10 mg every minute after 2 minutes, if adequate sedation is not achieved
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Propofol
Propofol will be given at an initial dose of 0.8 mg/kg followed by 20 mg every minute after 2 minutes, if adequate sedation is not achieved
Methohexital
Methohexital will be given at an initial dose of 0.5 mg/kg, followed by 10 mg every minute after 2 minutes, if adequate sedation is not achieved
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Hemodynamically compromised patients (as defined by hypotension \<90/50 mmHg, altered mental status, shock, ischemic chest discomfort, or heart failure)
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Elijah Beaty, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Beaty EH, Fernando RJ, Jacobs ML, Winter GG, Bulla C, Singleton MJ, Patel NJ, Bradford NS, Bhave PD, Royster RL. Comparison of Bolus Dosing of Methohexital and Propofol in Elective Direct Current Cardioversion. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Oct 4;11(19):e026198. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.026198. Epub 2022 Sep 21.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRB00061732
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.