Visual-acoustic Intervention With Service Delivery In-person and Via Telepractice Trial
NCT ID: NCT06517225
Last Updated: 2025-06-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
PHASE2
76 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-07-01
2028-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The objective of this study is to test the hypothesis that treatment incorporating visual-acoustic biofeedback can be delivered via telepractice without a significant loss of efficacy. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive identical treatment either via online telepractice or in the laboratory setting. The same software for visual-acoustic biofeedback, staRt, will be used in both conditions. Participants' progress in treatment will be evaluated based on blinded listeners' perceptual ratings of probes produced before and after treatment. Pre and post treatment evaluations will be carried out in person for all participants.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
BiOfeedback, Online for Sibilant Treatment
NCT07041723
Comparing Traditional and Biofeedback Telepractice Treatment for Residual Speech Errors
NCT04625062
Online Rotating Delivery of Perception/Production Enhanced Treatment for Rhotics
NCT06969521
Generalization With AI Navigation Using StaRt
NCT06884943
Correcting Residual Errors With Spectral, Ultrasound, Traditional Speech Therapy
NCT03737318
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Telepractice delivery
Participants will receive visual-acoustic biofeedback treatment from a clinician in a private, password-protected WebRTC room.
Visual-acoustic biofeedback
Behavioral: Visual-acoustic biofeedback In visual-acoustic biofeedback treatment, the elements of traditional treatment (auditory models and verbal descriptions of articulator placement) are enhanced with a dynamic display of the speech signal in the form of the real-time LPC (Linear Predictive Coding) spectrum. The web-based software staRt will be used for intervention delivery.
In-person delivery
Participants will receive visual-acoustic biofeedback treatment from a clinician in a private room in research space at one of the two clinical research sites.
Visual-acoustic biofeedback
Behavioral: Visual-acoustic biofeedback In visual-acoustic biofeedback treatment, the elements of traditional treatment (auditory models and verbal descriptions of articulator placement) are enhanced with a dynamic display of the speech signal in the form of the real-time LPC (Linear Predictive Coding) spectrum. The web-based software staRt will be used for intervention delivery.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Visual-acoustic biofeedback
Behavioral: Visual-acoustic biofeedback In visual-acoustic biofeedback treatment, the elements of traditional treatment (auditory models and verbal descriptions of articulator placement) are enhanced with a dynamic display of the speech signal in the form of the real-time LPC (Linear Predictive Coding) spectrum. The web-based software staRt will be used for intervention delivery.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Must speak English as the dominant or equally dominant language
* Must have begun learning English by age 3, per parent report.
* Must hear a rhotic dialect of English from at least one speaker in the home if the home language is English.
* Must pass a pure-tone hearing screening.
* Must pass a brief examination of oral structure and function.
* Must exhibit less than thirty percent accuracy, based on trained listener ratings, on a probe list eliciting /r/ in various phonetic contexts at the word level.
* Must demonstrate age-appropriate receptive and expressive language abilities on the Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals-5 (CELF-5).
* Must have access to a laptop or desktop computer for study sessions in the event of randomization to the telepractice condition.
* Must have home wifi sufficient to support video calls in the event of randomization to the telepractice condition.
Exclusion Criteria
* Must not currently have orthodontia that crosses the palate and cannot be removed.
* Must not have history of permanent hearing loss.
* Must not have an existing diagnosis of developmental disability such as cerebral palsy or Down Syndrome.
* Must not have history of major brain injury, surgery, or stroke in the past year.
* Must not have epilepsy with active seizure incidents with in the past 6 months.
* Must not show clinically significant signs of apraxia of speech or dysarthria.
9 Years
17 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Syracuse University
OTHER
Montclair State University
OTHER
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)
NIH
New York University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Montclair State University
Bloomfield, New Jersey, United States
New York University
New York, New York, United States
Syracuse University
Syracuse, New York, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ayala SA, Eads A, Kabakoff H, Swartz MT, Shiller DM, Hill J, Hitchcock ER, Preston JL, McAllister T. Auditory and Somatosensory Development for Speech in Later Childhood. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2023 Apr 12;66(4):1252-1273. doi: 10.1044/2022_JSLHR-22-00496. Epub 2023 Mar 17.
Benway NR, Preston JL, Hitchcock E, Rose Y, Salekin A, Liang W, McAllister T. Reproducible Speech Research With the Artificial Intelligence-Ready PERCEPT Corpora. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2023 Jun 20;66(6):1986-2009. doi: 10.1044/2023_JSLHR-22-00343. Epub 2023 Jun 15.
Campbell H, Harel D, Hitchcock E, McAllister Byun T. Selecting an acoustic correlate for automated measurement of American English rhotic production in children. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018 Nov;20(6):635-643. doi: 10.1080/17549507.2017.1359334. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
Campbell H, McAllister Byun T. Deriving individualised /r/ targets from the acoustics of children's non-rhotic vowels. Clin Linguist Phon. 2018;32(1):70-87. doi: 10.1080/02699206.2017.1330898. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
Harel D, Hitchcock ER, Szeredi D, Ortiz J, McAllister Byun T. Finding the experts in the crowd: Validity and reliability of crowdsourced measures of children's gradient speech contrasts. Clin Linguist Phon. 2017;31(1):104-117. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2016.1174306. Epub 2016 Jun 7.
Hitchcock ER, Ochs LC, Swartz MT, Leece MC, Preston JL, McAllister T. Tutorial: Using Visual-Acoustic Biofeedback for Speech Sound Training. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2023 Jan 11;32(1):18-36. doi: 10.1044/2022_AJSLP-22-00142. Epub 2023 Jan 9.
Hitchcock ER, Harel D, Byun TM. Social, Emotional, and Academic Impact of Residual Speech Errors in School-Aged Children: A Survey Study. Semin Speech Lang. 2015 Nov;36(4):283-94. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1562911. Epub 2015 Oct 12.
Hitchcock ER, Byun TM. Enhancing generalisation in biofeedback intervention using the challenge point framework: a case study. Clin Linguist Phon. 2015 Jan;29(1):59-75. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2014.956232. Epub 2014 Sep 12.
McAllister Byun T. Efficacy of Visual-Acoustic Biofeedback Intervention for Residual Rhotic Errors: A Single-Subject Randomization Study. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 May 24;60(5):1175-1193. doi: 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-S-16-0038.
McAllister Byun T, Campbell H. Differential Effects of Visual-Acoustic Biofeedback Intervention for Residual Speech Errors. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Nov 11;10:567. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00567. eCollection 2016.
McAllister Byun T, Halpin PF, Szeredi D. Online crowdsourcing for efficient rating of speech: a validation study. J Commun Disord. 2015 Jan-Feb;53:70-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2014.11.003. Epub 2014 Dec 15.
Byun TM, Hitchcock ER, Swartz MT. Retroflex versus bunched in treatment for rhotic misarticulation: evidence from ultrasound biofeedback intervention. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2014 Dec;57(6):2116-30. doi: 10.1044/2014_JSLHR-S-14-0034.
Byun TM, Hitchcock ER. Investigating the use of traditional and spectral biofeedback approaches to intervention for /r/ misarticulation. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2012 Aug;21(3):207-21. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2012/11-0083). Epub 2012 Mar 21.
Peterson L, Savarese C, Campbell T, Ma Z, Simpson KO, McAllister T. Telepractice Treatment of Residual Rhotic Errors Using App-Based Biofeedback: A Pilot Study. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2022 Apr 11;53(2):256-274. doi: 10.1044/2021_LSHSS-21-00084. Epub 2022 Jan 20.
Preston JL, McAllister T, Phillips E, Boyce S, Tiede M, Kim JS, Whalen DH. Treatment for Residual Rhotic Errors With High- and Low-Frequency Ultrasound Visual Feedback: A Single-Case Experimental Design. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018 Aug 8;61(8):1875-1892. doi: 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-S-17-0441.
Preston JL, Holliman-Lopez G, Leece MC. Do Participants Report Any Undesired Effects in Ultrasound Speech Therapy? Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2018 May 3;27(2):813-818. doi: 10.1044/2017_AJSLP-17-0121.
Preston JL, McAllister Byun T, Boyce SE, Hamilton S, Tiede M, Phillips E, Rivera-Campos A, Whalen DH. Ultrasound Images of the Tongue: A Tutorial for Assessment and Remediation of Speech Sound Errors. J Vis Exp. 2017 Jan 3;(119):55123. doi: 10.3791/55123.
McAllister T, Preston JL, Hitchcock ER, Benway NR, Hill J. Protocol for visual-acoustic intervention with service delivery in-person and via telepractice (VISIT) non-inferiority trial for residual speech sound disorder. BMC Pediatr. 2025 Jan 27;25(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12887-024-05364-z.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
VISIT non-inferiority
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.