Treating Childhood Apraxia of Speech

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

56 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-08-01

Study Completion Date

2022-06-07

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The study will test two modifications to speech therapy for 40 school-age children with childhood apraxia of speech to determine how to improve treatment outcomes. The study will compare treatment that includes real-time visual feedback of the tongue during speech using ultrasound vs traditional therapy that does not include ultrasound visual feedback. Additionally, some children will be treated with a traditional schedule of 2 sessions per week, whereas others will be provided with treatment that begins with intensive training (10 hours of therapy in one week) and progresses to a more distributed treatment schedule.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Comparing Traditional and Biofeedback Telepractice Treatment for Residual Speech Errors

NCT04625062

Speech Sound Disorder

COMPLETED PHASE1

AI-Assisted Treatment for Residual Speech Sound Disorders

NCT05988515

Speech Sound Disorder

RECRUITING NA

Efficacy of Ultrasound Biofeedback in Brazilian Childhood Apraxia of Speech

NCT07087249

Childhood Apraxia of Speech Speech Sound Disorders

NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA

Intensive Speech Motor Chaining Treatment for Residual Speech Sound Disorders

NCT05929859

Speech Sound Disorder

RECRUITING PHASE1/PHASE2

Delineation of Sensorimotor Subtypes Underlying Residual Speech Errors

NCT03736213

Speech Sound Disorder

COMPLETED PHASE1

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Childhood apraxia of speech is a developmental speech sound disorder that may lead to persisting speech errors, often despite years of treatment. Such impairments may lead to social, academic, and vocational limitations. Thus, there is a need to explore alternate treatment approaches. This study will explore how to improve speech sound production in school-age children with CAS by modifying a standard speech therapy program. Two adaptations to speech therapy will be tested in a 2 x 2 randomized group design.

In Aim 1, a standard treatment schedule of 2 one-hour sessions per week will be compared against a treatment sequence beginning with an intensive therapy schedule (10 hrs of treatment in one week), which will then transition to a more distributed practice schedule. This treatment modification is intended to minimize erred practice between training sessions in the early stages of learning, then foster generalization through increased time between practice sessions.

In Aim 2, a standard treatment that includes only verbal feedback to the client during speech practice will be compared against a treatment sequence that initially includes real-time ultrasound visual feedback of the tongue during speech, which will be faded over the course of treatment. Ultrasound visual feedback is designed to train articulatory movements. It may enhance children's understanding of the articulatory goals of speech movement patterns by comparing executed tongue movements with intended movements. Prior case reports and single subject experimental designs have shown that speech sound production may be enhanced by including ultrasound visual feedback, although no prior randomized group studies have been conducted.

Beside these modifications, the other aspects of treatment will be held constant. Outcomes will be evaluated by tracking changes in percent consonants correct from a large speech sample, scored by individuals who are blind to treatment status. The four groups will be compared to determine the extent to which speech sound therapy can be enhanced through a treatment sequence that begins with intensive practice and/or with ultrasound visual feedback.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Childhood Apraxia of Speech

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

FACTORIAL

2 x 2 design Scheduling: Mass--\>Distributed vs. Distributed only Visual feedback: Sequenced Ultrasound Biofeedback vs. No biofeedback

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Individuals who conduct the phonetic transcriptions that will be used for the primary outcome data will be blinded as to whether the recordings were collected before or after treatment, and also blinded as to the group assignment of the participant.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Biofeedback, Massed->Distributed

Sequenced biofeedback Mass Practice--\> Distributed Scheduling

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Biofeedback

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Real-time images of the tongue are made available using ultrasound placed beneath the chin. Participants practice speech movements and can be cued to modify their tongue shape or position to achieve clearer speech. Practice structure is similar to the Speech Motor Chaining procedures, but with the addition of a visual reference.

Massed --> Distributed Practice

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Week 1: 10 hours of treatment Week 2: 3 hours of treatment Week 3: 3 hours of treatment Week 4: 2 hours of treatment Week 5: 2 hours of treatment

No Biofeedback, Distributed

Speech Motor Chaining with no biofeedback. 2 sessions/wk for 10 weeks

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Speech Motor Chaining without Biofeedback

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

These procedures target sound sequences (consonant-vowel, consonant-consonant, or vowel-consonant). Sessions begin with Pre-practice to elicit the target sounds, with verbal cueing and shaping strategies. The Practice component then includes chaining that is response-contingent. Participants practice in blocks of 6 consecutive trials beginning at the syllable level. If 5/6 are correct, the participant advances to monosyllabic word practice, then multisyllabic word practice, phrase practice, and sentence practice (with the target syllable embedded within each level of complexity). If fewer than 5/6 trials are correct, a different syllable with the target sound pattern is practiced next. Verbal feedback is faded from 5 of 6 trials at the syllable level to only 3 of 6 trials at the sentence level. For more description, see http://speechproductionlab.syr.edu/Resources%20for%20Researchers.html

Distributed Practice

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

2 sessions per week for 10 weeks

Biofeedback, Distributed

Sequenced biofeedback, 2 sessions/wk for 10 weeks

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Biofeedback

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Real-time images of the tongue are made available using ultrasound placed beneath the chin. Participants practice speech movements and can be cued to modify their tongue shape or position to achieve clearer speech. Practice structure is similar to the Speech Motor Chaining procedures, but with the addition of a visual reference.

Distributed Practice

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

2 sessions per week for 10 weeks

No Biofeedback, Massed-> Distributed

Speech Motor Chaining with no biofeedback. Mass Practice--\> Distributed Scheduling

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Speech Motor Chaining without Biofeedback

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

These procedures target sound sequences (consonant-vowel, consonant-consonant, or vowel-consonant). Sessions begin with Pre-practice to elicit the target sounds, with verbal cueing and shaping strategies. The Practice component then includes chaining that is response-contingent. Participants practice in blocks of 6 consecutive trials beginning at the syllable level. If 5/6 are correct, the participant advances to monosyllabic word practice, then multisyllabic word practice, phrase practice, and sentence practice (with the target syllable embedded within each level of complexity). If fewer than 5/6 trials are correct, a different syllable with the target sound pattern is practiced next. Verbal feedback is faded from 5 of 6 trials at the syllable level to only 3 of 6 trials at the sentence level. For more description, see http://speechproductionlab.syr.edu/Resources%20for%20Researchers.html

Massed --> Distributed Practice

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Week 1: 10 hours of treatment Week 2: 3 hours of treatment Week 3: 3 hours of treatment Week 4: 2 hours of treatment Week 5: 2 hours of treatment

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Speech Motor Chaining without Biofeedback

These procedures target sound sequences (consonant-vowel, consonant-consonant, or vowel-consonant). Sessions begin with Pre-practice to elicit the target sounds, with verbal cueing and shaping strategies. The Practice component then includes chaining that is response-contingent. Participants practice in blocks of 6 consecutive trials beginning at the syllable level. If 5/6 are correct, the participant advances to monosyllabic word practice, then multisyllabic word practice, phrase practice, and sentence practice (with the target syllable embedded within each level of complexity). If fewer than 5/6 trials are correct, a different syllable with the target sound pattern is practiced next. Verbal feedback is faded from 5 of 6 trials at the syllable level to only 3 of 6 trials at the sentence level. For more description, see http://speechproductionlab.syr.edu/Resources%20for%20Researchers.html

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Biofeedback

Real-time images of the tongue are made available using ultrasound placed beneath the chin. Participants practice speech movements and can be cued to modify their tongue shape or position to achieve clearer speech. Practice structure is similar to the Speech Motor Chaining procedures, but with the addition of a visual reference.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Distributed Practice

2 sessions per week for 10 weeks

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Massed --> Distributed Practice

Week 1: 10 hours of treatment Week 2: 3 hours of treatment Week 3: 3 hours of treatment Week 4: 2 hours of treatment Week 5: 2 hours of treatment

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Native English speakers who hear English as the dominant language in their home setting.
* Must pass a hearing screening.
* Score at or better than -2 standard deviations from the mean on the Matrix Reasoning Task of the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence - 2nd Edition (WASI-2; t-score ≥ 30), Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test - 4th Edition (PPVT-4; standard score ≥ 70), and the Following Directions subtest of the Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals - 5th Edition (CELF-5; scaled score ≥ 3).
* Goldman-Fristoe Test of Articulation - 3rd Edition (GFTA-3) percentile ≤ 5th).
* A diagnosis of CAS will be verified based on a polysyllable picture naming task, diadochokinetic task (puh-tuh-kuh), and syllable repetition task.

Exclusion Criteria

* Parent report or direct evaluation reveals oral-facial structural abnormalities (e.g., cleft palate).
* Parental report of neurobehavioral disorders (e.g., autism spectrum disorders, ADHD, obsessive-compulsive disorder), or vision problems that are corrected with glasses/contacts.
* Fail a hearing screening, or failure to meet criteria listed above as Inclusionary

Minimum Eligible Age

9 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

17 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No