Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
6 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-07-30
2027-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
* Primary hypothesis: Biofeedback treatment for sibilants delivered via telepractice will produce positive gains compared to a no-treatment baseline phase.
* Secondary hypothesis: Participants will experience positive changes in social-emotional well-being after receiving biofeedback treatment for sibilants as reported by the participants and their guardians.
Following the initial evaluation, participants will be randomly assigned to transition from baseline to treatment at one of seven possible points, ranging from 4-10 baseline sessions in which /s/ production will be probed but not treated. All participants will then receive 20, 1-hour biofeedback treatment sessions over 10 weeks with a certified Speech-Language Pathologist via teletherapy, followed by three maintenance sessions.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Online Rotating Delivery of Perception/Production Enhanced Treatment for Rhotics
NCT06969521
staRt: Enhancing Speech Treatment With Smartphone-delivered Biofeedback
NCT04474691
Visual-acoustic Intervention With Service Delivery In-person and Via Telepractice Trial
NCT06517225
Comparing Traditional and Biofeedback Telepractice Treatment for Residual Speech Errors
NCT04625062
Delineation of Sensorimotor Subtypes Underlying Residual Speech Errors
NCT03736213
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Randomization. Following the initial evaluation to determine eligibility, participants will be randomly assigned to transition from the baseline to the treatment condition at one of 7 possible points, ranging from 4 to 10 baseline sessions in which /s/ production will be probed but not treated. All participants will then receive 20 sessions of /s/ production training over 10 weeks, followed by 3 maintenance sessions.
Intervention Delivery. All treatment will be provided on an individual basis by a certified speech-language pathologist. Treatment will be delivered over Zoom videoconference calls using a unique password-protected room for each participant. In the beginning of each session a standard probe eliciting /s/ in various contexts at the sentence, word and syllable levels will be elicited. Following the /s/ probes, the session will consist of relatively unstructured, highly interactive prepractice for 10 minutes, which is designed to provide instruction on the phonetic requirements for /s/ and shaping strategies to transform the child's current productions into accurate /s/. The remainder of the session will elicit up to 150 syllables/words or 40 minutes of practice, whichever occurs first. Practice will occur in blocks of 10 consecutive trials on the same item (e.g., 10 /sa/), after which a new item will be addressed (e.g., 10 /se/). Within each block, the clinician will provide qualitative (knowledge of performance) feedback as prompted by the research team's custom open-source software, Challenge Point Program (CPP). The CPP software prompts clinician actions such as delivery of knowledge of performance (KP) feedback, promoting increased fidelity in treatment implementation both within and across sites. It also enables systematic changes in practice difficulty based on participant performance, as follows: after the software presents a stimulus and the participant attempts to produce it, the clinician scores the response as 0 or 1 based on their clinical impression of an incorrect or correct production of /s/. Following each block of ten trials, the software automatically tallies the scores entered by the clinician and uses them to make adaptive changes in practice difficulty. When a participant demonstrates at least 80% cumulative accuracy at the session level, the participants will be advanced from syllable to word-level practice; if the cumulative session-level accuracy drops below 50%, the participants will be dropped back to the syllable level to decrease difficulty. In word-level practice, parameters are adjusted on a rotating basis so that as accuracy increases, either the frequency of feedback is reduced (80%-50%-20%-0%), clinician models are faded, or word shapes increase in complexity. Qualitative feedback (either biofeedback or verbal clinician feedback) will begin at 80% of trials and, contingent upon the participant's performance, will be systematically decreased to 0% .
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Visual acoustic biofeedback
Visual-acoustic biofeedback using the the SonaSpeech II software running the Sona Match module with the real-time FFT function.
Visual-acoustic biofeedback for Sibilants
Participants will view a real-time FFT spectrum and will be cued to match a visual target for /s/ where the spectral energy is concentrated to the right side of the display, primarily in the 5000-10,000 Hz region of the spectrum. Practice will occur in blocks of 10 consecutive trials on the same item (e.g., 10 /sa/), after which a new item will be addressed (e.g., 10 /se/). Within each block, the clinician will provide qualitative (knowledge of performance) feedback as prompted by the research team's custom open-source software, Challenge Point Program (CPP). The CPP software prompts clinician actions such as delivery of knowledge of performance (KP) feedback. Following each block of ten trials, the software automatically tallies the scores entered by the clinician and uses the summed scores to make adaptive changes in practice difficulty.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Visual-acoustic biofeedback for Sibilants
Participants will view a real-time FFT spectrum and will be cued to match a visual target for /s/ where the spectral energy is concentrated to the right side of the display, primarily in the 5000-10,000 Hz region of the spectrum. Practice will occur in blocks of 10 consecutive trials on the same item (e.g., 10 /sa/), after which a new item will be addressed (e.g., 10 /se/). Within each block, the clinician will provide qualitative (knowledge of performance) feedback as prompted by the research team's custom open-source software, Challenge Point Program (CPP). The CPP software prompts clinician actions such as delivery of knowledge of performance (KP) feedback. Following each block of ten trials, the software automatically tallies the scores entered by the clinician and uses the summed scores to make adaptive changes in practice difficulty.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* English as the dominant language (must have begun learning English by age 3, per parent report)
* Passes pure-tone hearing screening at 30 dB hearing level
* Passes brief examination of oral structure and function
* Less than 30% accuracy, based on consensus across 2 trained listeners, on a probe list eliciting fricative /s, z/ in various phonetic contexts at the word level
* No more than 3 sounds other than /s/ in error on the Goldman-Fristoe Test of Articulation-3 (GFTA-3)
* Diagnosis of ADHD, learning disability, dyslexia, or neurodiversity is admissible if participant meets cutoff scores on evaluation day 1
* History of CAS is admissible if participant meets cutoff scores on evaluation day 1
* Braces and removable retainers are admissible
* Access to a laptop or desktop computer and a quiet space for study sessions
Exclusion Criteria
* History of permanent hearing loss (temporary hearing loss due to otitis media, including recurrent OM/tubes, is admissible)
* History of developmental disorder (e.g., Down syndrome, cerebral palsy)
* History of major brain injury, surgery, or stroke in the past year (mild concussion is admissible)
* Active diagnosis of epilepsy or other neurological disorder (permissible if well-controlled for at least 6 months)
* Current diagnosis of voice or fluency disorder
* Current presence of orthodontia that crosses the palate (braces and removable retainers are admissible)
* Lack of access to a laptop or desktop computer and a quiet space for study sessions
8 Years
17 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)
NIH
Montclair State University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Montclair State University
Bloomfield, New Jersey, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Role: backup
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Hitchcock ER, Ochs LC, Swartz MT, Leece MC, Preston JL, McAllister T. Tutorial: Using Visual-Acoustic Biofeedback for Speech Sound Training. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2023 Jan 11;32(1):18-36. doi: 10.1044/2022_AJSLP-22-00142. Epub 2023 Jan 9.
Shriberg, L.D., R. Paul, and P. Flipsen, Childhood speech sound disorders: From crow to the postgenomic era. Speech sound disorders in children, 2009: p. 1-33.
Kraljevic JK, Matic A, Dokoza KP. Telepractice as a Reaction to the COVID-19 Crisis: Insights from Croatian SLP Settings. Int J Telerehabil. 2020 Dec 8;12(2):93-104. doi: 10.5195/ijt.2020.6325.
Whitehead E, Dorfman V, Tremper G, Kramer A, Sigler A, Gosman A. Telemedicine as a means of effective speech evaluation for patients with cleft palate. Ann Plast Surg. 2012 Apr;68(4):415-7. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31823b6897.
Lincoln M, Hines M, Fairweather C, Ramsden R, Martinovich J. Multiple stakeholder perspectives on teletherapy delivery of speech pathology services in rural schools: a preliminary, qualitative investigation. Int J Telerehabil. 2015 Jan 29;6(2):65-74. doi: 10.5195/IJT.2014.6155. eCollection 2014 Fall.
Wales D, Skinner L, Hayman M. The Efficacy of Telehealth-Delivered Speech and Language Intervention for Primary School-Age Children: A Systematic Review. Int J Telerehabil. 2017 Jun 29;9(1):55-70. doi: 10.5195/ijt.2017.6219. eCollection 2017 Spring.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
20-21-2137-Study 5
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.