Childhood Apraxia of Speech: Experience Dependent Changes Induced by Treatment
NCT ID: NCT04832503
Last Updated: 2023-10-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
24 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2018-09-30
2023-03-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Twenty four children with idiopathic CAS will be enrolled in a multidisciplinary study aimed at analysing the behavioural and neuroanatomical effects of a specific rehabilitative approach, PROMPT (PROMPTs for Restructuring Oral Muscular Phonetic Targets), that employs tactile-kinesthetic-proprioceptive cues vs a traditional speech-language treatment. The children will be allocated in two arms, one receiving a seven month cycle of individual PROMPT treatment, the other a traditional speech and language treatment for the same amount of time.The pre- and post-treatment speech and language performances and DTI and volumetric MR data will be compared in the two groups.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Treating Childhood Apraxia of Speech
NCT03238677
A Randomized Control Trial of Motor-based Intervention for CAS
NCT04642053
Speech Treatment for Minimally Verbal Children With ASD and CAS
NCT05066178
Stuttering and Apraxia of Speech: the Efficacy of an Intervention Program
NCT01097161
Efficacy of Ultrasound Biofeedback in Brazilian Childhood Apraxia of Speech
NCT07087249
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Objective: the current study is aimed to assess speech-language and white matter microstructure and volumetric changes induced by the PROMPT treatment.
Participants: Twenty-two Children with CAS aged 4 -12 years are enrolled and assigned to a PROMPT treatment (PROMPT-t ) or a Language and Non-Speech Oral Motor-treatment group (LNSOM-t).
Methods: All children with CAS will undergo a comprehensive clinical, neurological and speech-language assessment. The following procedures will be applied: a) anamnestic interview b) oral non verbal and verbal movements eveluation c) phonetic inventory, accuracy and consistency of speech d) DDK (Diadochokinetic rate, receptive and expressive vocabulary and grammar tests; f) spontaneous language analysis. These multiple measurements were aggregated and converted into a speech and language composite score.
MRI data will be acquired using a 1.5 T MR scanner. Structural images obtained with a 3D isotropic T1 weighted sequence will be analysed to evaluate volumetric alterations, to investigate cortical thickness and automatically delineate various Regions of Interest (ROIs). HARDI images will be acquired using 32 gradient directions and will be processed using tools available in FSL and MRtrix. Tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS) will be used to statistically analyse images of FA and mean diffusivity. Fiber tracts will be calculated using constrained spherical deconvolution and probabilistic tractography. Connectomes will be calculated by combining ROIs obtained from the structural images with tractography. Network-based analysis will be used to statistically analyse connectomes.
Speech and language assessment and brain MRI VBM and DTI analysis will be performed at baseline and at the end of the treatment.
Statistical analysis: Paired t-test on pre and post treatment behavioural and MRI/DTI measures will be performed to assess the changes within each of the two groups. Moreover, comparisons between the two groups at T0 and T1 will be performed by means of non parametric tests.
Evaluation of potentially training-induced changes of brain structural connectivity may provide further support to the hypothesis that CAS is due to a disruption of networks subserving the speech production system.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group 1
The PROMPT-treated group will include 12 children with idiopathic CAS. The pre-treatment assessment is aimed at evaluating the baseline speech and language level and at treatment planning. During a PROMPT session tactile-kinesthetic-proprioceptive inputs are consistently provided in order to shape speech movements, to give information on sequencing and timing, and to introduce constraints for the reduction of the degrees of freedom at the articulators' level in favour of motor control. In a PROMPT session the syllables, words and phrases are produced within a communicative context in play. Speech motor goals are, as soon as possible, integrated in goals for language and functional communication.
PROMPT- treatment
PROMPTs for Restructuring Oral Muscolar Phonetic Targets
GROUP 2
The LNSOM-treated group will include 12 children with idiopathic CAS. The pre-treatment assessment is aimed at evaluating the baseline speech and language level and at the treatment planning. None of the SLTs treating this group are PROMPT trained. According to the standard care methods used in Italy, the intervention consists of a linguistic and articulatory approach that includes auditory discrimination of phonemic categories at the syllable and word level and non-speech oral motor exercises. Receptive and expressive lexicon and morphosyntax are targeted depending on the children's linguistic profile.Differently from the PROMPT, selection of speech sounds to be targeted, is based on developmental speech sounds acquisition rather than motor criteria. According to this treatment approach, the motor goal is usually identified with the placement of the main articulator involved in the production of a speech sound.
LNSOM-treatment
Language Non-Speech Oral Motor Treatment
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
PROMPT- treatment
PROMPTs for Restructuring Oral Muscolar Phonetic Targets
LNSOM-treatment
Language Non-Speech Oral Motor Treatment
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Non-verbal IQ within the normal range at standardized tests of intelligence.
* Normal structural brain MRI.
* Acquisition of parents' informed consent to the execution of behavoiural and neuroradiological assessment at baseline and to perform speech/language treatment.
Exclusion Criteria
* Known pathologies of neurological, neurometabolical and genetic etiologies.
* Audiological deficits.
* Epilepsy.
* Intellectual disability.
* Autism spectrum disorder.
4 Years
16 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ministry of Health, Italy
OTHER_GOV
IRCCS Fondazione Stella Maris
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Anna Chilosi
MD, PhD Head of Neurolinguistic and Neuropsychological Research Laboratory. Coordinator of the Clinical Neuropsichological Unit
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Anna Chilosi
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
IRCCS Stella Maris Foundation
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
IRCCS Fondazione Stella Maris
Tirrenia, Tuscany, Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kadis DS, Goshulak D, Namasivayam A, Pukonen M, Kroll R, De Nil LF, Pang EW, Lerch JP. Cortical thickness in children receiving intensive therapy for idiopathic apraxia of speech. Brain Topogr. 2014 Mar;27(2):240-7. doi: 10.1007/s10548-013-0308-8. Epub 2013 Aug 24.
Fiori S, Guzzetta A, Mitra J, Pannek K, Pasquariello R, Cipriani P, Tosetti M, Cioni G, Rose SE, Chilosi A. Neuroanatomical correlates of childhood apraxia of speech: A connectomic approach. Neuroimage Clin. 2016 Nov 4;12:894-901. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2016.11.003. eCollection 2016.
Square PA, Namasivayam AK, Bose A, Goshulak D, Hayden D. Multi-sensory treatment for children with developmental motor speech disorders. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2014 Sep-Oct;49(5):527-42. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12083. Epub 2014 Mar 12. No abstract available.
Morgan AT, Su M, Reilly S, Conti-Ramsden G, Connelly A, Liegeois FJ. A Brain Marker for Developmental Speech Disorders. J Pediatr. 2018 Jul;198:234-239.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.02.043. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
Dale PS, Hayden DA. Treating speech subsystems in childhood apraxia of speech with tactual input: the PROMPT approach. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2013 Nov;22(4):644-61. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2013/12-0055). Epub 2013 Jun 28.
Namasivayam AK, Huynh A, Granata F, Law V, van Lieshout P. PROMPT intervention for children with severe speech motor delay: a randomized control trial. Pediatr Res. 2021 Feb;89(3):613-621. doi: 10.1038/s41390-020-0924-4. Epub 2020 May 1.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RF-2016-02361560
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.